| Literature DB >> 34377013 |
Peng Xue1, Yuqi Yang2, Qi Yun1, Yue Cui1, Bin Yu2, Wei Long2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To screen variants of the thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) gene among congenital hypothyroidism (CH) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a genetic screening of the TSHR gene in a cohort of 125 Chinese CH patients. Variants were detected by customized targeted next-generation sequencing.Entities:
Keywords: congenital hypothyroidism; prevalence; thyroid stimulating hormone receptor; variant
Year: 2021 PMID: 34377013 PMCID: PMC8349214 DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S322726
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Gen Med ISSN: 1178-7074
Characteristics and Damage Prediction of Identified TSHR Variants in 14 Patients
| Patient ID | Sex | hTSH (mIU/L) | TSH at Diagnosis (mIU/L) | FT4 at Diagnosis (pmol/L) | Thyroid Morphology | Variants | Location of Domain | SIFT | PolyPhen_2_HVAR | MutationTaster |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 69.5 | >75 | 1.88 | Normal | c.1574T>C, p.F525S | β, ICL 2 | 0.08 | 0.967 | DC |
| 2 | M | 15.2 | >75 | 5.09 | Undiagnosed | c.700T>C, p.S234P | α, LRR 8 | 0 | 0.998 | DC |
| c.1349G>A, p.R450H | β, ICL1 | 0 | 0.999 | DC | ||||||
| 3 | M | 19.5 | >75 | 2.86 | Normal | c.1349G>A, p.R450H | β, ICL1 | 0 | 0.999 | DC |
| 4 | F | 37.6 | >75 | 7.13 | Normal | c.1270G>T, p.V424F | β, TMD 1 | 0 | 1 | DC |
| 5 | F | 104 | >75 | 1.98 | Hypoplasia | c.1222T>C, p.C408R | α, Hinge region | 0 | 0.999 | DC |
| 6 | M | 111 | >75 | 3.35 | Hypoplasia | c.1384T>C, p.C462R | β, TMD 2 | 0 | 0.999 | DC |
| c.1574T>C, p.F525S | β, ICL 2 | 0.08 | 0.967 | DC | ||||||
| 7 | F | 43 | >75 | 6.1 | Normal | c.823G>A, p.A275T | α, LRR 9 | 0.04 | 0.997 | DC |
| 8 | M | 10.5 | >75 | 3.98 | Ectopy | c.394G>C, p.G132R | α, LRR 4 | 0.14 | 0.784 | DC |
| c.1349G>A, p.R450H | β, ICL1 | 0 | 0.999 | DC | ||||||
| 9 | F | 9.34 | 59.49 | 5.99 | Normal | c.1591C>T, p.R531W | β, ICL 2 | 0.01 | 0.998 | DC |
| 10 | M | 50 | >75 | 1.23 | Hypoplasia | c.394G>C, p.G132R | α, LRR 4 | 0.14 | 0.784 | DC |
| 11 | M | 141 | >75 | 4.87 | Goiter | c.1838A>G, p.Y613C | β, ICL 3 | 0.02 | 0.989 | DC |
| 12 | M | 15.5 | >75 | 6.88 | Normal | c.733G>A, p.G245S | α, LRR 8 | 0 | 0.998 | DC |
| 13 | F | 43.6 | >75 | 5.54 | Normal | c.1574T>C, p.F525S | β, ICL 2 | 0.08 | 0.967 | DC |
| 14 | M | 211 | >75 | 1.01 | Normal | c.1574T>C, p.F525S | β, ICL 2 | 0.08 | 0.967 | DC |
Notes: SIFT scores less than 0.05 are predicted to be deleterious, and those greater than or equal to 0.05 are predicted to be tolerated. Polyphen-2 score: “probably damaging” if the score is between 0.909 and 1, and “possibly damaging” if the score is between 0.447 and 0.908, and “benign” if the score is between 0 and 0.446.
Abbreviations: hTSH, heel blood TSH; M, male; F, female; TMD, transmembrane domain; ICL, intracellular loop; ECL, extracellular loop; LRR, leucine-rich repeat; DC, disease causing.
Figure 1Model of TSHR protein structure and localization of variants that identified in the present cohort.
Figure 2Multiple sequence alignment of TSHR protein among 11 different species.
Detection Rate of TSHR Variants Among Different Populations
| Nation | Patients | Detection Rate | Detection Method | Authors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | CH | 11.2% (14/125) | Target NGS | The present study |
| China | CH | 1.67% (4/240) | Target NGS | Fu et al 2016 |
| China | Subclinical CH | 4.17% (6/144) | Target NGS | Fu et al 2016 |
| China | CH | 4.65% (2/43) | Target NGS | Wang et al 2020 |
| China | CH | 7.27% (8/110) | Target NGS | Sun et al 2018 |
| China | CH | 5.91% (13/220) | Target NGS | Fang et al 2019 |
| China | CH | 1.52% (1/66) | Target NGS | Fan et al 2017 |
| China | CH | 6% (6/100) | Target NGS | Wang et al 2017 |
| Japan | CH | 3.68% (5/136) | Target NGS | Tanaka et al 2020 |
| Japan | CH | 7.19% (12/167) | Target NGS | Yamaguchi et al 2020 |
| Japan | CH | 5.88% (6/102) | PCR-based sequencing | Narumi et al 2009 |
| Japan | CH | 12% (3/25) | Target NGS | Watanabe et al 2021 |
| Korea | CH | 6.74% (13/193) | PCR-based sequencing | Lee et al 2011 |
| Korea | CH | 5.29% (9/170) | PCR-based sequencing | Park et al 2016 |
| Korea | CH with GIS | 30% (6/20) | Target NGS | Shin et al 2021 |
| Korea | CH with GIS | 11.63% (5/43) | PCR-based sequencing | Jin et al 2014 |
| Italy | Subclinical hypothyroidism | 28.95% (11/38) | PCR-based sequencing | Nicoletti et al 2009 |
| Italy | Subclinical hypothyroidism | 11.9% (5/42) | PCR-based sequencing | Tonacchera et al 2004 |
| United Kingdom et al† | CH with GIS | 2.5% (1/40) | NGS | Nicholas et al 2016 |
| Macedonia | CH | 10% (4/40) | PCR-based sequencing | Zdraveska et al 2020 |
| Saudi Arabia | CH | 10.91% (6/55) | NGS | Zou et al 2018 |
| Thailand | CH | 4.24% (5/118) | Target NGS | Sorapipatcharoen et al 2020 |
| United Arab Emirates | CH | 1.54% (1/65) | Target NGS | Deeb et al 2016 |
| Brazil | TD | 0% (0/63) | PCR-based sequencing | Cerqueira et al 2018 |
| Hungary | PCH | 4.71% (4/85) | PCR-based sequencing | Lábadi et al 2015 |
Note: †: United Kingdom, Oman, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Turkey.
Abbreviations: GIS, gland-in-situ; PCH, permanent CH; TD, thyroid dysgenesis; NGS, next generation sequencing.
Allele Frequency of Identified Variants Among Different Populations
| Variants | Allele Count | Allele Frequency | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present Cohort | East Asian | Global | ||||
| p.G132R | 2 | 0.008 | 0.0006 | 0.00004282 | 0.013 | <0.001 |
| p.G245S | 1 | 0.004 | 0.0012 | 0.00008838 | 0.268 | 0.023 |
| p.A275T | 1 | 0.004 | 0.00033 | 0.00002386 | 0.09 | 0.007 |
| p.C408R | 1 | 0.004 | 0 | 0.000007953 | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| p.V424F | 1 | 0.004 | 0 | 0.00001768 | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| p.R450H | 3 | 0.012 | 0.00284 | 0.0002121 | 0.039 | <0.001 |
| p.F525S | 4 | 0.016 | 0.00186 | 0.0001379 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| p.R531W | 1 | 0.004 | 0.00011 | 0.00002785 | 0.04 | 0.008 |
| p.Y613C | 1 | 0.004 | 0.00065 | 0.00004597 | 0.16 | 0.012 |
Notes: The data of allele frequency in East Asia and globally were quoted from gnomAD. P †: Comparison of allele frequency between the present cohort and East Asia. P ‡: Comparison of allele frequency between the present cohort and the global cohort.