Literature DB >> 34376508

Association of Age With Contrast-Enhancing Lesions Across the Multiple Sclerosis Disease Spectrum.

Marcus W Koch1, Jop Mostert2, Yinan Zhang2, Jerry S Wolinsky2, Fred D Lublin2, Eva Strijbis2, Gary Cutter2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association of age and the presence of contrast-enhancing lesions (CELs) on cranial MRI scans in different disease courses of multiple sclerosis (MS), we describe the frequency of CELs as a function of age in 4 large randomized controlled trial (RCT) datasets.
METHODS: Using original trial data from CombiRx (Combination Therapy in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis; clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00211887), a trial in relapsing-remitting MS; ASCEND (A Clinical Study of the Efficacy of Natalizumab on Reducing Disability Progression in Participants With Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis; clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01416181), a trial in secondary progressive MS; and the 2 primary progressive MS trials PROMISE and INFORMS; clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00731692), we describe the occurrence of CELs per age group at baseline for the entire trial cohort and at 1 year follow-up in the treatment arms.
RESULTS: CombiRx included 1,008, ASCEND 889, PROMISE 943, and INFORMS 970 participants. At baseline, CEL frequency differed between datasets according to disease course: 39.6% of CombiRx, 23.9% of ASCEND, 14.0% of PROMISE, and 12.3% of INFORMS participants had CELs. This distribution by disease course was largely preserved within each age group. In all datasets, there was an almost linear decrease of the percentage of participants with CELs with advancing age. After 1 year of experimental treatment, CEL occurrence was reduced in all trial datasets, and almost absent in ASCEND. The decrease of CEL occurrence with advancing age was preserved in CombiRx, PROMISE, and INFORMS after 1 year of treatment. We investigated the association of the baseline factors age, disease duration, sex, and EDSS with having CELs at baseline with multivariable binary logistic regression models. Age was the only characteristic associated with the risk of CELs at baseline in all datasets, with higher age associated with a lower risk of CELs (odds ratios for having CELs at baseline per year increase in age: CombiRx: 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-0.98; ASCEND: 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.97; PROMISE: 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.96; INFORMS: 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99). DISCUSSION: Our analysis of 4 large, well-characterized RCT datasets shows that the association of age and CEL occurrence is a general phenomenon across the spectrum of MS disease courses. Our findings should be replicated in real-world MS datasets.
© 2021 American Academy of Neurology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34376508      PMCID: PMC8589289          DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   11.800


  20 in total

1.  Age-related gadolinium-enhancement of MRI brain lesions in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Carla Tortorella; Alessandra Bellacosa; Damiano Paolicelli; Aurora Fuiani; Elisabetta Di Monte; Isabella Laura Simone; Patrizia Giaquinto; Paolo Livrea; Maria Trojano
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 3.181

2.  Lesion enhancement diminishes with time in primary progressive multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Z Khaleeli; O Ciccarelli; K Mizskiel; D Altmann; D H Miller; A J Thompson
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.312

3.  New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols.

Authors:  C M Poser; D W Paty; L Scheinberg; W I McDonald; F A Davis; G C Ebers; K P Johnson; W A Sibley; D H Silberberg; W W Tourtellotte
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 4.  Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Daniel S Reich; Claudia F Lucchinetti; Peter A Calabresi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Will the real multiple sclerosis please stand up?

Authors:  Peter K Stys; Gerald W Zamponi; Jan van Minnen; Jeroen J G Geurts
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Effect of natalizumab on disease progression in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (ASCEND): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with an open-label extension.

Authors:  Raju Kapoor; Pei-Ran Ho; Nolan Campbell; Ih Chang; Aaron Deykin; Fiona Forrestal; Nisha Lucas; Bei Yu; Douglas L Arnold; Mark S Freedman; Myla D Goldman; Hans-Peter Hartung; Eva Kubala Havrdová; Douglas Jeffery; Aaron Miller; Finn Sellebjerg; Diego Cadavid; Dan Mikol; Deborah Steiner
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 7.  Progressive multiple sclerosis: pathology and pathogenesis.

Authors:  Hans Lassmann; Jack van Horssen; Don Mahad
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 42.937

8.  Meta-analysis of the Age-Dependent Efficacy of Multiple Sclerosis Treatments.

Authors:  Ann Marie Weideman; Marco Aurelio Tapia-Maltos; Kory Johnson; Mark Greenwood; Bibiana Bielekova
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Is inflammation important in early PPMS? a longitudinal MRI study.

Authors:  G T Ingle; J Sastre-Garriga; D H Miller; A J Thompson
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Predicting gadolinium enhancement status in MS patients eligible for randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  F Barkhof; U Held; J H Simon; M Daumer; F Fazekas; M Filippi; J A Frank; L Kappos; D Li; S Menzler; D H Miller; J Petkau; J Wolinsky
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Patients : Review.

Authors:  Malgorzata Siger
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.156

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.