| Literature DB >> 34376131 |
Shibin Chen1,2, Qiujie Xie3, Ming Yang2, Yajun Shi4, Junhui Shi4, Xiaobin Zeng3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Baicalin, a flavonoid glycoside compound present in Scutellaria baicalensis, has shown a wide spectrum of biological activities, but its liposolubility, water-solubility and mucosal permeability are all very poor, which leads to the low concentration in brain and poor bioavailability by oral or intravenous injective administration.Entities:
Keywords: Scutellaria baicalensis extract-phospholipid complex; central composite design-response surface methodology; cerebral ischemia; pharmacodynamics; stability study
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34376131 PMCID: PMC9189737 DOI: 10.2174/1389201022666210729142257
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Pharm Biotechnol ISSN: 1389-2010 Impact factor: 2.829
Fig. (3)Surface response plot showing the influence of phospholipids/drug ratio (A, m/m), the reaction temperature (B, °C), and the drug concentration (C, mg/ml) on entrapment efficiency (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).
Fig. (4)Physicochemical properties of SBEPC. Surface morphology of SBEPC (SEM) at (A) 500 × and (B) 2500 × magnifications. (C) Particle size analysis of SBEPC. (D) IR spectrum of SBEPC. (E) 1H-NMR spectrum of SBEPC (CDCl3, 600 MHz) (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).
Fig. (5)Effect of temperature (A and B), illumination (C and D), humidity (E and F) on the stability of SBEPC and Critical relative humidity moisture absorption curve of SBEPC (G) (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).
Fig. (6)SBEPC improved neurological damage and brain indices in rats with CI. (A) Three ways of administration improved neurological damage in rats with CI. (B) Data relating to the extent of cerebral infarction in each way of administration group. (C) Three doses of administration improved neurological damage in rats with CI. (D) Data relating to the extent of cerebral infarction in each dose of administration group. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). ## p < 0.01 compared with the control group; ** p < 0.01 compared with the CI model group (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).
Coded levels and real values for each factor under study.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| X1 | 1.00 | 1.42 | 2.00 | 2.58 | 3.00 |
| X2 | 30.00 | 36.34 | 45.00 | 53.66 | 60.00 |
| X3 | 2.50 | 3.56 | 5.0 | 6.44 | 7.50 |
CCD-RSM design experiments and results.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | 1.42 | 36.34 | 3.56 | 83.12 |
| 2 | 2.58 | 36.34 | 3.56 | 90.54 |
| 3 | 1.42 | 53.66 | 3.56 | 79.86 |
| 4 | 2.58 | 53.66 | 3.56 | 90.42 |
| 5 | 1.42 | 36.34 | 6.44 | 67.13 |
| 6 | 2.58 | 36.34 | 6.44 | 88.17 |
| 7 | 1.42 | 53.66 | 6.44 | 68.58 |
| 8 | 2.58 | 53.66 | 6.44 | 89.05 |
| 9 | 1.00 | 45.00 | 5.00 | 63.42 |
| 10 | 3.00 | 45.00 | 5.00 | 92.34 |
| 11 | 2.00 | 30.00 | 5.00 | 80.97 |
| 12 | 2.00 | 60.00 | 5.00 | 82.06 |
| 13 | 2.00 | 45.00 | 2.50 | 87.11 |
| 14 | 2.00 | 45.00 | 7.50 | 75.18 |
| 15 | 2.00 | 45.00 | 5.00 | 88.47 |
| 16 | 2.00 | 45.00 | 5.00 | 88.66 |
| 17 | 2.00 | 45.00 | 5.00 | 88.85 |
| 18 | 2.00 | 45.00 | 5.00 | 88.66 |
| 19 | 2.00 | 45.00 | 5.00 | 89.05 |
| 20 | 2.00 | 45.00 | 5.00 | 89.14 |
Variance analysis table of quadratic model of response surface.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 1376.29 | 9 | 152.92 | 80.57 | <0.0001 |
| A-phospholipids/drug ratio | 857.71 | 1 | 857.71 | 451.92 | <0.0001 |
| B- reaction temperature | 0.050 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.026 | 0.8741 |
| C- drug concentration | 190.72 | 1 | 190.72 | 100.49 | <0.0001 |
| AB | 0.82 | 1 | 0.82 | 0.445 | 0.5244 |
| AC | 69.20 | 1 | 69.21 | 36.46 | 0.0001 |
| BC | 4.075 | 1 | 4.075 | 2.15 | 0.1735 |
| A2 | 168.85 | 1 | 168.85 | 88.97 | <0.0001 |
| B2 | 67.01 | 1 | 67.02 | 35.30 | 0.0681 |
| C2 | 75.25 | 1 | 75.26 | 39.65 | <0.0001 |
Observed and predicted values of entrapment efficiency.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 92.81 | 93.87 |
| 2 | 93.09 | 93.87 |
| 3 | 92.56 | 93.87 |
| 4 | 92.62 | 93.87 |
| 5 | 92.82 | 93.87 |
| 6 | 92.49 | 93.87 |
Investigation results of relative humidity.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22.5 | CH3COOK | 6.3 |
| 2 | 33.0 | MgCl2 | 7.2 |
| 3 | 42.7 | K2CO3 | 11.8 |
| 4 | 57.7 | NaBr | 28.2 |
| 5 | 75.3 | NaCl | 50.2 |
| 6 | 84.3 | KCl | 60.5 |