Literature DB >> 34374824

Efficacy of coronary sinus Reducer in patients with refractory angina and diabetes mellitus.

Giovanni M Vescovo1, Carlo Zivelonghi1, Pierfrancesco Agostoni1, Mirthe Dekker2, Max Silvis2, Geert Leenders2, Jan Peter van Kuijk3, Leo Timmers3, Pieter Stella2, Shmuel Banai4, Stefan Verheye5.   

Abstract

Coronary sinus Reducer (CSR) implantation is currently recommended to relieve angina in patients with refractory symptoms despite optimal medical therapy and maximally achievable revascularization. The impact of diabetes mellitus on outcome after CSR implantation is at present unknown. We aimed to explore the impact of CSR in refractory angina patients with diabetes mellitus. Data from consecutive patients undergoing CSR implantation at four different centres between 2014 and 2018 were included. Patients were divided according to the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus. Primary objective of this analysis was to evaluate the clinical response to CSR implantation defined as an improvement of ≥ 1 classes of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Classification. A total of 219 patients were included, 116 (53%) of whom had diabetes mellitus. The median age of the population was 69 years and 167 patients (76%) were male. There were no significant differences between groups of patients with and without diabetes mellitus with respect to CCS class at baseline (p value = 0.32) and at follow-up (p = 0.75). Over a median follow-up of 393 [224-1004] days, 84 (72%) of the patients with diabetes mellitus met the primary outcome, similarly to those without diabetes mellitus (p = 0.28). Fifty-three patients (24%) did not have an improvement in CCS class and no one experienced worsening of angina. CSR implantation was equally effective in improving angina symptoms among patients with refractory angina and diabetes mellitus compared to patients without diabetes mellitus.
© 2021. Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic coronary syndrome; Coronary sinus reducer; Diabetes; Refractory angina

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34374824     DOI: 10.1007/s00380-021-01909-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Vessels        ISSN: 0910-8327            Impact factor:   2.037


  2 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of the coronary sinus Reducer and its impact on the healthcare burden of refractory angina patients.

Authors:  Guglielmo Gallone; Patrizio Armeni; Stefan Verheye; Pierfrancesco Agostoni; Leo Timmers; Gianluca Campo; Alfonso Ielasi; Fabio Sgura; Giuseppe Tarantini; Liesbeth Rosseel; Carlo Zivelonghi; Geert Leenders; Pieter Stella; Matteo Tebaldi; Maurizio Tespili; Gianpiero D'Amico; Luca Baldetti; Francesco Ponticelli; Antonio Colombo; Francesco Giannini
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2020-01-01

2.  Incomplete coronary sinus reducer endothelialization as potential mechanism of clinical failure.

Authors:  Carlo Zivelonghi; Gaelle Vermeersch; Stefan Verheye; Pierfrancesco Agostoni
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-03-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.