Yeo Kyung Nam1, Ji Eun Park2, Seo Young Park3, Minkyoung Lee4, Minjae Kim1, Soo Jung Nam5, Ho Sung Kim1. 1. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea. 2. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea. jieunp@gmail.com. 3. Department of Statistics and Data Science, Korea National Open University, Seoul, Korea. 4. Department of Radiology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. 5. Department of Pathology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine reproducible MRI parameters predictive of molecular subtype and risk stratification in glioma and develop a structured reporting system. METHODS: All study patients were initially diagnosed with glioma, 141 from the Cancer Genome Atlas and 131 from our tertiary institution, as training and validation sets, respectively. Images were analyzed by three neuroradiologists with 1-7 years of experience. MRI features including contrast enhancement pattern, necrosis, margin, edema, T2/FLAIR mismatch, internal cyst, and cerebral blood volume higher than normal cortex were reported using a structured reporting system. The pathology was stratified into five risk types: (1) oligodendroglioma, isocitrate dehydrogenase [IDH]-mutant, 1p19q co-deleted; (2) diffuse astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, grade II-III; (3) glioblastoma, IDH-mutant, grade IV; (4) diffuse astrocytoma, IDH-wild, grade II-III; and (5) glioblastoma, IDH-wild, grade IV. Significant predictors were selected using multivariate logistic regression, and diagnostic performance was tested using a validation set. RESULTS: Reproducible imaging parameters exhibiting > 50% agreement across readers included the presence of necrosis, T2/FLAIR mismatch, internal cyst, and predominant contrast enhancement. In the validation set, prediction of risk type 5 exhibited the highest diagnostic performance with AUCs of 0.92 (reader 1) and 0.93 (reader 2) with predominant enhancement, followed by risk type 2 with AUCs of 0.95 and 0.95 with T2/FLAIR mismatch sign and no necrosis, and risk type 1 with AUCs of 0.84 and 0.83 with internal cyst or necrosis. Risk types 3 and 4 were difficult to visually predict. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging parameters with high reproducibility enabling prediction of IDH-wild-type glioblastoma, IDH-mutant/1p19q co-deletion oligodendroglioma, and IDH-mutant diffuse astrocytoma were identified. KEY POINTS: • Reproducible MRI parameters for determining molecular subtypes of glioma included the presence of necrosis, T2/FLAIR mismatch, internal cyst, and predominant contrast enhancement. • IDH-wild type glioblastoma, IDH-mutant/1p19q co-deletion oligodendroglioma, and IDH-mutant low-grade astrocytoma were identified using MRI parameters with high inter-reader reproducibility. • Identification of IDH-wild type low-grade glioma and IDH-mutant glioblastoma was difficult by visual analysis.
OBJECTIVES: To determine reproducible MRI parameters predictive of molecular subtype and risk stratification in glioma and develop a structured reporting system. METHODS: All study patients were initially diagnosed with glioma, 141 from the Cancer Genome Atlas and 131 from our tertiary institution, as training and validation sets, respectively. Images were analyzed by three neuroradiologists with 1-7 years of experience. MRI features including contrast enhancement pattern, necrosis, margin, edema, T2/FLAIR mismatch, internal cyst, and cerebral blood volume higher than normal cortex were reported using a structured reporting system. The pathology was stratified into five risk types: (1) oligodendroglioma, isocitrate dehydrogenase [IDH]-mutant, 1p19q co-deleted; (2) diffuse astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, grade II-III; (3) glioblastoma, IDH-mutant, grade IV; (4) diffuse astrocytoma, IDH-wild, grade II-III; and (5) glioblastoma, IDH-wild, grade IV. Significant predictors were selected using multivariate logistic regression, and diagnostic performance was tested using a validation set. RESULTS: Reproducible imaging parameters exhibiting > 50% agreement across readers included the presence of necrosis, T2/FLAIR mismatch, internal cyst, and predominant contrast enhancement. In the validation set, prediction of risk type 5 exhibited the highest diagnostic performance with AUCs of 0.92 (reader 1) and 0.93 (reader 2) with predominant enhancement, followed by risk type 2 with AUCs of 0.95 and 0.95 with T2/FLAIR mismatch sign and no necrosis, and risk type 1 with AUCs of 0.84 and 0.83 with internal cyst or necrosis. Risk types 3 and 4 were difficult to visually predict. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging parameters with high reproducibility enabling prediction of IDH-wild-type glioblastoma, IDH-mutant/1p19q co-deletion oligodendroglioma, and IDH-mutant diffuse astrocytoma were identified. KEY POINTS: • Reproducible MRI parameters for determining molecular subtypes of glioma included the presence of necrosis, T2/FLAIR mismatch, internal cyst, and predominant contrast enhancement. • IDH-wild type glioblastoma, IDH-mutant/1p19q co-deletion oligodendroglioma, and IDH-mutant low-grade astrocytoma were identified using MRI parameters with high inter-reader reproducibility. • Identification of IDH-wild type low-grade glioma and IDH-mutant glioblastoma was difficult by visual analysis.