Literature DB >> 34373938

Electrochemical sensing behavior of graphdiyne nanoflake towards uric acid: a quantum chemical approach.

Misbah Asif1, Hasnain Sajid1, Khurshid Ayub1, Mazhar Amjad Gilani2, Mohammed Salim Akhter3, Tariq Mahmood4,5.   

Abstract

Though the gas sensing applications of graphdiyne have widely reported; however, the biosensing utility of graphdiyne needs to be explored. This study deals with the sensitivity of graphdiyne nanoflake (GDY) towards the uric acid (UA) within the density functional framework. The uric acid is allowed to interact with graphdiyne nanoflake from all the possible orientations. Based on these interacting geometries, the complexes are differentiated with naming, i.e., UA1@GDY, UA2@GDY, UA3@GDY, and UA4@GDY (Fig. 1). The essence of interface interactions of UA on GDY is derived by computing geometric, energetic, electronic, and optical properties. The adsorbing affinity of complexes is evaluated at ωB97XD/6-31 + G(d, p) level of theory. The stabilities of the complexes are quantified through the interaction energies (Eint) with reasonable accuracy. The calculated Eint of the UA1@GDY, UA2@GDY, UA3@GDY, and UA4@GDY complexes are - 31.13, - 25.87, - 20.59, and - 16.54 kcal/mol, respectively. In comparison with geometries, it is revealed that the higher stability of complexes is facilitated by π-π stacking. Other energetic analyses including symmetry adopted perturbation theory (SAPT), noncovalent interaction index (NCI), and quantum theory of atoms in molecule (QTAIM) provide the evidence of dominating dispersion energy in stabilizing the resultant complexes. The HOMO-LUMO energies, NBO charge transfer, and UV-vis analysis justify the higher electronic transition in UA1@GDY, plays a role of higher sensitivity of GDY towards the π-stacked geometries over all other possible interaction orientations. The present findings bestow the higher sensitivity of GDY towards uric acid via π-stacking interactions. Fig. 1 Optimized geometries (with interaction distances in Å) of UA@GDY complexes.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biosensing; Density functional theory; Graphdiyne nanoflake; Uric acid

Year:  2021        PMID: 34373938     DOI: 10.1007/s00894-021-04860-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Model        ISSN: 0948-5023            Impact factor:   1.810


  24 in total

1.  A novel electrochemical sensor based on carbon nanotubes array for selective detection of dopamine or uric acid.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Meixian Li; Zhiwei Zhu
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 6.057

2.  Detection of Purine Metabolite Uric Acid with Picolinic-Acid-Functionalized Metal-Organic Frameworks.

Authors:  Shumei Qu; Zheng Li; Qiong Jia
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 9.229

3.  The simultaneous electrochemical detection of ascorbic acid, dopamine, and uric acid using graphene/size-selected Pt nanocomposites.

Authors:  Chia-Liang Sun; Hsin-Hsien Lee; Jen-Ming Yang; Ching-Chou Wu
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 10.618

Review 4.  Gout, uric acid and purine metabolism in paediatric nephrology.

Authors:  J S Cameron; F Moro; H A Simmonds
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Direct determination of uric acid in serum by a fluorometric-enzymatic method based on uricase.

Authors:  J Galbán; Y Andreu; M J Almenara; S de Marcos; J R Castillo
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2001-06-21       Impact factor: 6.057

6.  An electrochemical biosensor based on novel butylamine capped CZTS nanoparticles immobilized by uricase for uric acid detection.

Authors:  Shefali Jain; Shilpi Verma; Surinder P Singh; Shailesh Narain Sharma
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 10.618

7.  Solubility of uric acid and monosodium urate.

Authors:  W R Wilcox; A Khalaf; A Weinberger; I Kippen; J R Klinenberg
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1972-07

8.  A critical review of glucose biosensors based on carbon nanomaterials: carbon nanotubes and graphene.

Authors:  Zhigang Zhu; Luis Garcia-Gancedo; Andrew J Flewitt; Huaqing Xie; Francis Moussy; William I Milne
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  An Amperometric Biosensor for Uric Acid Determination Prepared From Uricase Immobilized in Polyaniline-Polypyrrole Film.

Authors:  Fatma Arslan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  Recent advances in graphene-based biosensor technology with applications in life sciences.

Authors:  Janire Peña-Bahamonde; Hang N Nguyen; Sofia K Fanourakis; Debora F Rodrigues
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 10.435

View more
  1 in total

1.  Ab initio study for superior sensitivity of graphyne nanoflake towards nitrogen halides over ammonia.

Authors:  Hasnain Sajid; Sidra Khan; Khurshid Ayub; Mazhar Amjad Gilani; Tariq Mahmood; Umar Farooq; Mohammed Salim Akhter
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 1.810

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.