Literature DB >> 34373592

Risk factors for hospital acquired pressure injury in patients with spinal cord injury during first rehabilitation: prospective cohort study.

Klara Najmanova1, Charlotte Neuhauser1, Jörg Krebs1, Michael Baumberger1, Dirk Johannes Schaefer2, Clara O Sailer3,4, Reto Wettstein2, Anke Scheel-Sailer5,6.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study.
OBJECTIVES: First, describe pressure injury (PI) and associated risk factors in individuals with spinal cord injury/disorder (SCI/D) during first rehabilitation. Second, evaluate a prediction model for hospital acquired PI (HAPI) development.
SETTING: Acute care and rehabilitation clinic specialized in SCI/D.
METHODS: Patients ≥18 years of age with SCI/D were included during first rehabilitation between 08/2018 and 12/2019. We performed a systematic literature search to identify risk factors for PI development. Patients were classified according to HAPI developed. Between group differences of patients' characteristics and risk factors were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Logistic predictive models were performed to estimate HAPI development and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to test the model.
RESULTS: In total, 94 patients were included, 48 (51.1%) developed at least one HAPI and in total 93 were observed, mainly stage I and stage II HAPI according to the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. We found nine significantly associated risk factors: completeness of SCI/D, pneumonia, sedative medications, autonomic dysreflexia, Braden ≤12 points, SCIPUS ≥9 points, lower admission SCIM and lower admission FIM-cognition, longer length of stay (LOS) (p ≤ 0.0005). In a predictive model, none of the risk factors was associated with HAPI development (AUC = 0.5).
CONCLUSION: HAPIs in patients with SCI/D during first rehabilitation are a frequent and complex condition and associated with several risk factors. No predictive model exists but with the identified risk factors of this study, larger studies can create a tailored and flexible HAPI risk prediction model.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Spinal Cord Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34373592     DOI: 10.1038/s41393-021-00681-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  9 in total

Review 1.  Norton, Waterlow and Braden scores: a review of the literature and a comparison between the scores and clinical judgement.

Authors:  Denis Anthony; Sam Parboteeah; Mohammad Saleh; Panos Papanikolaou
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.036

2.  A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis.

Authors:  P Peduzzi; J Concato; E Kemper; T R Holford; A R Feinstein
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  The new measuring multimorbidity index predicted mortality better than Charlson and Elixhauser indices among the general population.

Authors:  James Stanley; Diana Sarfati
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  A review of scales for assessing the risk of developing a pressure ulcer in individuals with SCI.

Authors:  W B Mortenson; W C Miller
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 5.  The pressure injury predictive model: A framework for hospital-acquired pressure injuries.

Authors:  Dana Tschannen; Christine Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.036

6.  A new pressure ulcer risk assessment scale for individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  C A Salzberg; D W Byrne; C G Cayten; P van Niewerburgh; J G Murphy; M Viehbeck
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 7.  The Glasgow Coma Scale at 40 years: standing the test of time.

Authors:  Graham Teasdale; Andrew Maas; Fiona Lecky; Geoffrey Manley; Nino Stocchetti; Gordon Murray
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 44.182

8.  Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Staging System: Revised Pressure Injury Staging System.

Authors:  Laura E Edsberg; Joyce M Black; Margaret Goldberg; Laurie McNichol; Lynn Moore; Mary Sieggreen
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.741

9.  The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement.

Authors:  Eric I Benchimol; Liam Smeeth; Astrid Guttmann; Katie Harron; David Moher; Irene Petersen; Henrik T Sørensen; Erik von Elm; Sinéad M Langan
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 11.069

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.