Literature DB >> 34373308

Utility of the FebriDx point-of-care assay in supporting a triage algorithm for medical admissions with possible COVID-19: an observational cohort study.

Ankur Gupta-Wright1,2, Laurence John3, Hamish Houston3, Gavin Deas4, Shivam Naik5, Kamal Shah5, Shiras Patel5, Maria Greca Dottori5, Michael Tay5, Sarah Ann Filson3, James Biggin-Lamming6, John Ross7, Natalie Vaughan8, Nidhi Vaid4, Guduru Gopal Rao9,10, Amit K Amin9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a triage algorithm used to identify and isolate patients with suspected COVID-19 among medical patients needing admission to hospital using simple clinical criteria and the FebriDx assay.
DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort.
SETTING: Large acute National Health Service hospital in London, UK. PARTICIPANTS: All medical admissions from the emergency department between 10 August 2020 and 4 November 2020 with a valid SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR result.
INTERVENTIONS: Medical admissions were triaged as likely, possible or unlikely COVID-19 based on clinical criteria. Patients triaged as possible COVID-19 underwent FebriDx lateral flow assay on capillary blood, and those positive for myxovirus resistance protein A (a host response protein) were managed as likely COVID-19. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity and predictive values) of the algorithm and the FebriDx assay using SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR from nasopharyngeal swabs as the reference standard.
RESULTS: 4.0% (136) of 3443 medical admissions had RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19. Prevalence of COVID-19 was 46% (80/175) in those triaged as likely, 4.1% (50/1225) in possible and 0.3% (6/2033) in unlikely COVID-19. Using a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR reference standard, clinical triage had sensitivity of 96% (95% CI 91% to 98%) and specificity of 61.5% (95% CI 59.8% to 63.1%), while the triage algorithm including FebriDx had sensitivity of 93% (95% CI 87% to 96%) and specificity of 86.4% (95% CI 85.2% to 87.5%). While 2033 patients were deemed not to require isolation using clinical criteria alone, the addition of FebriDx to clinical triage allowed a further 826 patients to be released from isolation, reducing the need for isolation rooms by 9.5 per day, 95% CI 8.9 to 10.2. Ten patients missed by the algorithm had mild or asymptomatic COVID-19.
CONCLUSIONS: A triage algorithm including the FebriDx assay had good sensitivity and was useful to 'rule-out' COVID-19 among medical admissions to hospital. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; infection control; molecular diagnostics

Year:  2021        PMID: 34373308     DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  2 in total

Review 1.  FebriDx for rapid screening of patients with suspected COVID-19 upon hospital admission: systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  G Lippi; R Nocini; C Mattiuzzi; B M Henry
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 8.944

2.  Blood myxovirus resistance protein-1 measurement in the diagnostic work-up of suspected COVID-19 infection in the emergency department.

Authors:  Kirby Tong-Minh; Samantha van Hooijdonk; Marjan A Versnel; Cornelia G van Helden-Meeuwsen; Petrus Martin van Hagen; Eric C M van Gorp; Henrik Endeman; Yuri van der Does; Virgil A S H Dalm; Willem A Dik
Journal:  Immun Inflamm Dis       Date:  2022-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.