Literature DB >> 34372976

Economic Evaluation of Urine-Based or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reflex Tests in Men With Intermediate Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels in the United States.

Boshen Jiao1, Roman Gulati2, Nathaniel Hendrix3, John L Gore4, Soroush Rais-Bahrami5, Todd M Morgan6, Ruth Etzioni7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: For men with intermediate prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (4-10 ng/mL), urine-based biomarkers and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are increasingly used as reflex tests before prostate biopsy. We assessed the cost effectiveness of these reflex tests in the United States.
METHODS: We used an existing microsimulation model of prostate cancer (PCa) progression and survival to predict lifetime outcomes for a hypothetical cohort of 55-year-old men with intermediate PSA levels. Urine-based biomarkers-PCa antigen (PCA3), TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion (T2:ERG), and the MyProstateScore (MPS) for any PCa and for high-grade (Gleason score ≥7) PCa (MPShg)-were generated using biomarker data from 1112 men presenting for biopsy at 10 United States institutions. MRI results were based on published sensitivity and specificity for high-grade PCa. Costs and utilities were sourced from literature and Medicare reimbursement schedules. Outcome measures included life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and lifetime medical costs per patient. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were empirically calculated on the basis of simulated life histories under different reflex testing strategies.
RESULTS: Biopsying all men provided the most life years and QALYs, followed by reflex testing using MPShg, MPS, MRI, T2:ERG, PCA3, and biopsying no men (QALY range across strategies 15.98-16.09). Accounting for costs, MRI and MPShg were dominated by other strategies. PCA3, T2:ERG, and MPS were likely to be the most cost-effective strategy at willingness-to-pay thresholds of $100 000/QALY, $125 000/QALY, and $150 000/QALY, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Using PCA3, T2:ERG, or MPS as reflex tests has greater economic value than MRI, biopsying all men, or biopsying no men with intermediate PSA levels.
Copyright © 2021 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; cost effectiveness; magnetic resonance imaging; prostate cancer; reflex testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34372976      PMCID: PMC8358184          DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.101


  44 in total

1.  Overdiagnosis and Lives Saved by Reflex Testing Men With Intermediate Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Todd M Morgan; Teresa A'mar; Sarah P Psutka; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Detection of High-grade Prostate Cancer Using a Urinary Molecular Biomarker-Based Risk Score.

Authors:  Leander Van Neste; Rianne J Hendriks; Siebren Dijkstra; Geert Trooskens; Erik B Cornel; Sander A Jannink; Hans de Jong; Daphne Hessels; Frank P Smit; Willem J G Melchers; Gisèle H J M Leyten; Theo M de Reijke; Henk Vergunst; Paul Kil; Ben C Knipscheer; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Peter F A Mulders; Inge M van Oort; Wim Van Criekinge; Jack A Schalken
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  The cost-effectiveness of combined androgen blockade with bicalutamide and luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist in men with metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  David F Penson; Scott Ramsey; David Veenstra; Lauren Clarke; Sanjay Gandhi; Mark Hirsch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Quality-of-life effects of prostate-specific antigen screening.

Authors:  Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Elisabeth M Wever; Anssi Auvinen; Jonas Hugosson; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Arnauld Villers; Alvaro Páez; Sue M Moss; Marco Zappa; Teuvo L J Tammela; Tuukka Mäkinen; Sigrid Carlsson; Ida J Korfage; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot; Suzie J Otto; Gerrit Draisma; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol; Fritz H Schröder; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A 16-yr Follow-up of the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Marianne Månsson; Teuvo L J Tammela; Marco Zappa; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Sigrid V Carlsson; Kirsi M Talala; Hans Lilja; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Alvaro Paez; Donella Puliti; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Tuomas P Kilpeläinen; Ulf H Stenman; Rebecka Arnsrud Godtman; Karin Stinesen Kollberg; Sue M Moss; Paula Kujala; Kimmo Taari; Andreas Huber; Theodorus van der Kwast; Eveline A Heijnsdijk; Chris Bangma; Harry J De Koning; Fritz H Schröder; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (LATITUDE): final overall survival analysis of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Karim Fizazi; NamPhuong Tran; Luis Fein; Nobuaki Matsubara; Alfredo Rodriguez-Antolin; Boris Y Alekseev; Mustafa Özgüroğlu; Dingwei Ye; Susan Feyerabend; Andrew Protheroe; Giri Sulur; Yesenia Luna; Susan Li; Suneel Mundle; Kim N Chi
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  What if I don't treat my PSA-detected prostate cancer? Answers from three natural history models.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Elisabeth M Wever; Alex Tsodikov; David F Penson; Lurdes Y T Inoue; Jeffrey Katcher; Shih-Yuan Lee; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Gerrit Draisma; Harry J de Koning; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening: a simulation study based on ERSPC data.

Authors:  E A M Heijnsdijk; T M de Carvalho; A Auvinen; M Zappa; V Nelen; M Kwiatkowski; A Villers; A Páez; S M Moss; T L J Tammela; F Recker; L Denis; S V Carlsson; E M Wever; C H Bangma; F H Schröder; M J Roobol; J Hugosson; H J de Koning
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Assessment of long-term outcomes associated with urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 and TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion at repeat biopsy.

Authors:  Selin Merdan; Scott A Tomlins; Christine L Barnett; Todd M Morgan; James E Montie; John T Wei; Brian T Denton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Association Between Combined TMPRSS2:ERG and PCA3 RNA Urinary Testing and Detection of Aggressive Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Martin G Sanda; Ziding Feng; David H Howard; Scott A Tomlins; Lori J Sokoll; Daniel W Chan; Meredith M Regan; Jack Groskopf; Jonathan Chipman; Dattatraya H Patil; Simpa S Salami; Douglas S Scherr; Jacob Kagan; Sudhir Srivastava; Ian M Thompson; Javed Siddiqui; Jing Fan; Aron Y Joon; Leonidas E Bantis; Mark A Rubin; Arul M Chinnayian; John T Wei; Mohamed Bidair; Adam Kibel; Daniel W Lin; Yair Lotan; Alan Partin; Samir Taneja
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessing the impact of MRI based diagnostics on pre-treatment disease classification and prognostic model performance in men diagnosed with new prostate cancer from an unscreened population.

Authors:  Artitaya Lophatananon; Matthew H V Byrne; Tristan Barrett; Anne Warren; Kenneth Muir; Ibifuro Dokubo; Fanos Georgiades; Mostafa Sheba; Lisa Bibby; Vincent J Gnanapragasam
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Biomarkers for prostate cancer detection and risk stratification.

Authors:  Mark W Farha; Simpa S Salami
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-06-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.