Saeed Oraee-Yazdani1, Mohammadhosein Akhlaghpasand2, Maryam Golmohammadi2, Maryam Hafizi3,4, Mina Soufi Zomorrod5, Nima Mohseni Kabir6, Maryam Oraee-Yazdani2, Farzad Ashrafi2, Alireza Zali7, Masoud Soleimani8. 1. Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1988873554, Iran. Saeed_o_yazdani@sbmu.ac.ir. 2. Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1988873554, Iran. 3. Stem Cell Technology Research Centre, Tehran, Iran. 4. Department of Research and Development, Sodour Ahrar Shargh Company, Tehran, Iran. 5. Applied cell Sciences Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. 6. Department of Neurosurgery, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 7. Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1988873554, Iran. dr_alirezazali@sbmu.ac.ir. 8. Department of Hematology, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. ssoleim_m@modares.ac.ir.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cellular transplantations have promising effects on treating spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and Schwann cells (SCs), which have safety alongside their complementary characteristics, are suggested to be the two of the best candidates in SCI treatment. In this study, we assessed the safety and possible outcomes of intrathecal co-transplantation of autologous bone marrow MSC and SC in patients with subacute traumatic complete SCI. METHODS: Eleven patients with complete SCI (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS); grade A) were enrolled in this study during the subacute period of injury. The patients received an intrathecal autologous combination of MSC and SC and were followed up for 12 months. We assessed the neurological changes by the American Spinal Injury Association's (ASIA) sensory-motor scale, functional recovery by spinal cord independence measure (SCIM-III), and subjective changes along with adverse events (AE) with our checklist. Furthermore, electromyography (EMG), nerve conduction velocity (NCV), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and urodynamic study (UDS) were conducted for all the patients at the baseline, 6 months, and 1 year after the intervention. RESULTS: Light touch AIS score alterations were approximately the same as the pinprick changes (11.6 ± 13.1 and 12 ± 13, respectively) in 50% of the cervical and 63% of the lumbar-thoracic patients, and both were more than the motor score alterations (9.5 ± 3.3 in 75% of the cervical and 14% of the lumbar-thoracic patients). SCIM III total scores (21.2 ± 13.3) and all its sub-scores ("respiration and sphincter management" (15 ± 9.9), "mobility" (9.5 ± 13.3), and "self-care" (6 ± 1.4)) had statistically significant changes after cell injection. Our findings support that the most remarkable positive, subjective improvements were in trunk movement, equilibrium in standing/sitting position, the sensation of the bladder and rectal filling, and the ability of voluntary voiding. Our safety evaluation revealed no systemic complications, and radiological images showed no neoplastic overgrowth, syringomyelia, or pseudo-meningocele. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that autologous SC and bone marrow-derived MSC transplantation at the subacute stage of SCI could reveal statistically significant improvement in sensory and neurological functions among the patients. It appears that using this combination of cells is safe and effective for clinical application to spinal cord regeneration during the subacute period.
BACKGROUND: Cellular transplantations have promising effects on treating spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and Schwann cells (SCs), which have safety alongside their complementary characteristics, are suggested to be the two of the best candidates in SCI treatment. In this study, we assessed the safety and possible outcomes of intrathecal co-transplantation of autologous bone marrow MSC and SC in patients with subacute traumatic complete SCI. METHODS: Eleven patients with complete SCI (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS); grade A) were enrolled in this study during the subacute period of injury. The patients received an intrathecal autologous combination of MSC and SC and were followed up for 12 months. We assessed the neurological changes by the American Spinal Injury Association's (ASIA) sensory-motor scale, functional recovery by spinal cord independence measure (SCIM-III), and subjective changes along with adverse events (AE) with our checklist. Furthermore, electromyography (EMG), nerve conduction velocity (NCV), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and urodynamic study (UDS) were conducted for all the patients at the baseline, 6 months, and 1 year after the intervention. RESULTS: Light touch AIS score alterations were approximately the same as the pinprick changes (11.6 ± 13.1 and 12 ± 13, respectively) in 50% of the cervical and 63% of the lumbar-thoracic patients, and both were more than the motor score alterations (9.5 ± 3.3 in 75% of the cervical and 14% of the lumbar-thoracic patients). SCIM III total scores (21.2 ± 13.3) and all its sub-scores ("respiration and sphincter management" (15 ± 9.9), "mobility" (9.5 ± 13.3), and "self-care" (6 ± 1.4)) had statistically significant changes after cell injection. Our findings support that the most remarkable positive, subjective improvements were in trunk movement, equilibrium in standing/sitting position, the sensation of the bladder and rectal filling, and the ability of voluntary voiding. Our safety evaluation revealed no systemic complications, and radiological images showed no neoplastic overgrowth, syringomyelia, or pseudo-meningocele. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that autologous SC and bone marrow-derived MSC transplantation at the subacute stage of SCI could reveal statistically significant improvement in sensory and neurological functions among the patients. It appears that using this combination of cells is safe and effective for clinical application to spinal cord regeneration during the subacute period.
Authors: Michael C Jin; Zachary A Medress; Tej D Azad; Vanessa M Doulames; Anand Veeravagu Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Pu-Cha Jiang; Wen-Ping Xiong; Ge Wang; Chao Ma; Wei-Qi Yao; Steven F Kendell; Brian M Mehling; Xian-Hou Yuan; Dong-Cheng Wu Journal: Exp Ther Med Date: 2013-04-29 Impact factor: 2.447
Authors: Christopher Elnan Kvistad; Torbjørn Kråkenes; Cecilie Gjerde; Kamal Mustafa; Tiina Rekand; Lars Bø Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-05-30 Impact factor: 4.086