Patricia Jepma1,2, Corine H M Latour3, Iris H J Ten Barge4, Lotte Verweij5,3, Ron J G Peters5, Wilma J M Scholte Op Reimer5,6, Bianca M Buurman5,7. 1. Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.jepma@amsterdamumc.nl. 2. Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.jepma@amsterdamumc.nl. 3. Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Nursing Sciences, Program of Clinical Health Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 6. HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Research Group Chronic Diseases, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 7. Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Older cardiac patients are at high risk of readmission and mortality. Transitional care interventions (TCIs) might contribute to the prevention of adverse outcomes. The Cardiac Care Bridge program was a randomized nurse-coordinated TCI combining case management, disease management and home-based rehabilitation for hospitalized frail older cardiac patients. This qualitative study explored the experiences of patients' participating in this study, as part of a larger process evaluation as this might support interpretation of the neutral study outcomes. In addition, understanding these experiences could contribute to the design and application of future transitional care interventions for frail older cardiac patients. METHODS: A generic qualitative approach was used. Semi-structured interviews were performed with 16 patients ≥70 years who participated in the intervention group. Participants were selected by gender, diagnosis, living arrangement and hospital of inclusion. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. In addition, quantitative data about intervention delivery were analysed. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the data: 1) appreciation of care continuity; 2) varying experiences with recovery and, 3) the influence of an existing care network. Participants felt supported by the transitional care intervention as they experienced post-discharge support and continuity of care. The perceived contribution of the program in participants' recovery varied. Some participants reported physical improvements while others felt impeded by comorbidities or frailty. The home visits by the community nurse were appreciated, although some participants did not recognize the added value. Participants with an existing healthcare provider network preferred to consult these providers instead of the providers who were involved in the transitional care intervention. CONCLUSION: Our results contribute to an explanation of the neutral study of a nurse-coordinated transitional care intervention. For future purpose, it is important to identify which patients might benefit most from TCIs. Furthermore, the intensity and content of TCIs could be more personalized by tailoring interventions to older cardiac patients' needs, considering their frailty, self-management skills and existing formal and informal caregiver networks.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Older cardiac patients are at high risk of readmission and mortality. Transitional care interventions (TCIs) might contribute to the prevention of adverse outcomes. The Cardiac Care Bridge program was a randomized nurse-coordinated TCI combining case management, disease management and home-based rehabilitation for hospitalized frail older cardiac patients. This qualitative study explored the experiences of patients' participating in this study, as part of a larger process evaluation as this might support interpretation of the neutral study outcomes. In addition, understanding these experiences could contribute to the design and application of future transitional care interventions for frail older cardiac patients. METHODS: A generic qualitative approach was used. Semi-structured interviews were performed with 16 patients ≥70 years who participated in the intervention group. Participants were selected by gender, diagnosis, living arrangement and hospital of inclusion. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. In addition, quantitative data about intervention delivery were analysed. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the data: 1) appreciation of care continuity; 2) varying experiences with recovery and, 3) the influence of an existing care network. Participants felt supported by the transitional care intervention as they experienced post-discharge support and continuity of care. The perceived contribution of the program in participants' recovery varied. Some participants reported physical improvements while others felt impeded by comorbidities or frailty. The home visits by the community nurse were appreciated, although some participants did not recognize the added value. Participants with an existing healthcare provider network preferred to consult these providers instead of the providers who were involved in the transitional care intervention. CONCLUSION: Our results contribute to an explanation of the neutral study of a nurse-coordinated transitional care intervention. For future purpose, it is important to identify which patients might benefit most from TCIs. Furthermore, the intensity and content of TCIs could be more personalized by tailoring interventions to older cardiac patients' needs, considering their frailty, self-management skills and existing formal and informal caregiver networks.
Authors: Harriette G C Van Spall; Shun Fu Lee; Feng Xie; Urun Erbas Oz; Richard Perez; Peter R Mitoff; Manish Maingi; Michael C Tjandrawidjaja; Michael Heffernan; Mohammad I Zia; Liane Porepa; Mohamed Panju; Lehana Thabane; Ian D Graham; R Brian Haynes; Dilys Haughton; Kim D Simek; Dennis T Ko; Stuart J Connolly Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-02-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Harriette G C Van Spall; Tahseen Rahman; Oliver Mytton; Chinthanie Ramasundarahettige; Quazi Ibrahim; Conrad Kabali; Michiel Coppens; R Brian Haynes; Stuart Connolly Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Susan P Bell; Nicole M Orr; John A Dodson; Michael W Rich; Nanette K Wenger; Kay Blum; John Gordon Harold; Mary E Tinetti; Mathew S Maurer; Daniel E Forman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Davinia Maria Resurrección; Patricia Moreno-Peral; Marta Gómez-Herranz; Maria Rubio-Valera; Luis Pastor; Jose Miguel Caldas de Almeida; Emma Motrico Journal: Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 3.908
Authors: Kumar Dharmarajan; Angela F Hsieh; Vivek T Kulkarni; Zhenqiu Lin; Joseph S Ross; Leora I Horwitz; Nancy Kim; Lisa G Suter; Haiqun Lin; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: BMJ Date: 2015-02-05
Authors: L Verweij; P Jepma; B M Buurman; C H M Latour; R H H Engelbert; G Ter Riet; F Karapinar-Çarkit; S Daliri; R J G Peters; W J M Scholte Op Reimer Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: P Jepma; G Ter Riet; M van Rijn; C H M Latour; R J G Peters; W J M Scholte Op Reimer; B M Buurman Journal: Neth Heart J Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 2.380