| Literature DB >> 34372732 |
Ruikun Liao1,2, Dan Zhang1,2, Xiaojiao Li1,2, Jiang Ma1, Jiayi Yu1,2, Chao Yang1,2, Hua Xiong1,2, Bi Zhou1,2, Xianlong Huang1, Zhuoyue Tang1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of choline (Cho) value of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in rabbit with VX2 liver tumor via comparative and quantitative analysis with the choline compounds concentration measured by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).Entities:
Keywords: 3.0 tesla; choline; liver cancer; proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34372732 PMCID: PMC8361547 DOI: 10.1177/15330338211036852
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat ISSN: 1533-0338
Sequence Parameters of Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 1H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.
| Sequences | TR (ms) | TE (ms) | Thickness (mm) | FOV (mm) | Matrix | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1WI | 450 | 9.0 | 5 | 210 × 210 | 256 × 192 | 2 |
| T2WI | 2800 | 95 | 5 | 210 × 210 | 256 × 192 | 4 |
| T1WI-VIBE | 4.6 | 1.7 | 2 | 210 × 210 | 320 × 272 | 2 |
| MRS | 2000 | 135 | - | 210 × 210 | - | 130 |
Abbreviations: TR, repetition time; TE, echo time; FOV, field of voxel; T1WI, T1-weighted imaging; T2WI, T2-weighted imaging; MRS, magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
Figure 1.The 1H MRS of liver cancer and liver tissue. A, The Cho peak at 3.2 ppm is significantly increased in liver VX2 tumor. B, The Cho peak of normal liver tissue at 3.2 ppm is significantly lower than that of liver cancer. MRS indicates magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Cho, choline.
Differences of Cho Value and Concentration of ACh in Liver Cancer and Liver Tissue.
| Parameters | Cho | ACh |
|---|---|---|
| Liver | 16.800 (9.488, 30.500) | 61898333.33 ± 24260169.06 |
| Tumor | 42.461 ± 16.799 | 97582222.22 ± 20773613.51 |
| Test | 62.500 | −4.740 |
| 0.002 | < 0.001 |
Abbreviations: Cho, the value under of choline containing peak; ACh, concentration of acetylcholine.
Concentrations of Choline Compounds in Liver Cancer and Liver Tissue.
| Parameters | Ach (pg/ml) | GPC (pg/ml) | PC (pg/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liver | (61.90 ± 24.26) × 106 | (43.43 ± 14.32) × 103 | 83.32 ± 21.90 |
| Tumor | (97.58 ± 20.77) × 106 | (75.05 ± 12.34) × 103 | 112.28 ± 19.03 |
Abbreviations: ACh, concentration of acetylcholine; GPC, concentration of glycerophosphylcholine; PC, concentration of phosphocholine.
Figure 2.The ROC curves for the diagnosis of liver cancer based on Cho value and ACh concentration. ROC indicates receiver operating characteristic; Cho, choline; ACh, acetylcholine.
Diagnostic Efficiency of Cho and ACh in the Diagnosis of Liver Cancer.
| Variables | AUC |
| 95%CI | Cutoff | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cho | 0.807 | 0.002 | 0.657-0.957 | 28.350 | 0.833 | 0.778 |
| Ach | 0.883 | <0.001 | 0.767-0.999 | 72590000.000 | 0.944 | 0.778 |
Abbreviations: Cho, the value under of choline containing peak; ACh, concentration of acetylcholine.
Figure 3.H&E staining of liver cancer and liver tissue. A, The H&E-stained section shows the tumor cell morphology is irregular, the tumor cell size was inconsistent, and the nucleus was heteromorphic. B, The H&E-stained section shows the liver tissue structure was clear without obvious signs of degeneration and necrosis. H&E indicates hematoxylin and eosin.