Literature DB >> 34372628

The Mount Sinai Hospital Institute for critical care medicine response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Jennifer Wang1,2, Evan Leibner1,3, Jaime B Hyman4, Sanam Ahmed1,2, Joshua Hamburger4, Jean Hsieh1,5, Neha Dangayach1,6, Pranai Tandon1, Umesh Gidwani1,7, Andrew Leibowitz4, Roopa Kohli-Seth1,2.   

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in a dramatic surge in the number of critically ill patients. This was especially true in New York city, the epicenter of the pandemic in the United States. In the present study, a roadmap was proposed for hospitals and health systems to prepare for a surge in critical care capacity.
Methods: This was a retrospective review of how Mount Sinai Hospital (MSH) was able to rapidly prepare to handle the COVID-19 pandemic. How MSH, the largest academic hospital within the Mount Sinai Health System, rapidly expanded the intensive care unit (ICU) bed capacity, including creating new ICU beds in traditionally non-critical care areas, expanded the workforce for ICUs, and created guidelines to streamline workflow, is described in this review.
Results: MSH expanded from a 1,139-bed quaternary care academic referral hospital with 104 ICU beds to 1,453 beds (27.5% increase) with 235 ICU beds (126% increase) during the pandemic peak in the first week of April 2020. From March to June 2020, with follow-up through October 2020, MSH admitted 2,591 COVID-19-positive patients, 614 to ICUs. Most admitted patients received noninvasive support including a non-rebreather mask, high flow nasal cannula, and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. Among ICU patients, 68.4% (n=420) received mechanical ventilation; among the admitted ICU patients, 40.7% (n=250) died, and 47.8% (n=294) were discharged alive. Among the patients requiring mechanical ventilation, 55.0% (n=231) died and 43.1% (n=181) were discharged alive from the hospital.
Conclusion: : Flexible bed management initiatives; teamwork across multiple disciplines; and development and implementation of guidelines for airway management, cardiac arrest, anticoagulation, vascular access, and proning were critical in streamlining workflow and accommodating the surge in critically ill patients. Non-ICU services and staff were deployed to augment the critical care work force and open new critical care units by leveraging a tiered staffing model. This approach to rapidly expand bed availability and staffing across the system helped provide the best care for the patients and saved lives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID policies; COVID preparations; COVID procedures; COVID-19; critical care response

Year:  2021        PMID: 34372628     DOI: 10.4266/acc.2021.00402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acute Crit Care        ISSN: 2586-6052


  1 in total

Review 1.  Sustaining the Australian respiratory workforce through the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping literature review.

Authors:  Emily Stone; Louis B Irving; Katrina O Tonga; Bruce Thompson
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.611

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.