Literature DB >> 34372278

Review on Comparison of Different Energy Storage Technologies Used in Micro-Energy Harvesting, WSNs, Low-Cost Microelectronic Devices: Challenges and Recommendations.

Amna Riaz1,2, Mahidur R Sarker3,4, Mohamad Hanif Md Saad3, Ramizi Mohamed1.   

Abstract

This paper reviews energy storage systems, in general, and for specific applications in low-cost micro-energy harvesting (MEH) systems, low-cost microelectronic devices, and wireless sensor networks (WSNs). With the development of electronic gadgets, low-cost microelectronic devices and WSNs, the need for an efficient, light and reliable energy storage device is increased. The current energy storage systems (ESS) have the disadvantages of self-discharging, energy density, life cycles, and cost. The ambient energy resources are the best option as an energy source, but the main challenge in harvesting energy from ambient sources is the instability of the source of energy. Due to the explosion of lithium batteries in many cases, and the pros associated with them, the design of an efficient device, which is more reliable and efficient than conventional batteries, is important. This review paper focused on the issues of the reliability and performance of electrical ESS, and, especially, discussed the technical challenges and suggested solutions for ESS (batteries, supercapacitors, and for a hybrid combination of supercapacitors and batteries) in detail. Nowadays, the main market of batteries is WSNs, but in the last decade, the world's attention has turned toward supercapacitors as a good alternative of batteries. The main advantages of supercapacitors are their light weight, volume, greater life cycle, turbo charging/discharging, high energy density and power density, low cost, easy maintenance, and no pollution. This study reviews supercapacitors as a better alternative of batteries in low-cost electronic devices, WSNs, and MEH systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  WSNs; energy storage system; low-cost microelectronics; micro-energy harvesting

Year:  2021        PMID: 34372278     DOI: 10.3390/s21155041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.576


  4 in total

1.  Validation and Evaluation of a Behavioral Circuit Model of an Enhanced Electrostatic MEMS Converter.

Authors:  Mona S Salem; Abdelhalim Zekry; Mohamed Abouelatta; Ahmed Shaker; Marwa S Salem
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.523

Review 2.  Micro Energy Storage Systems in Energy Harvesting Applications: Analytical Evaluation towards Future Research Improvement.

Authors:  Mahidur R Sarker; Mohamad Hanif Md Saad; Amna Riaz; M S Hossain Lipu; José Luis Olazagoitia
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.523

3.  A hybrid approach to enhance the lifespan of WSNs in nuclear power plant monitoring system.

Authors:  Md Ershadul Haque; Tanvir Hossain; Mahidur R Sarker; Manoranjan Paul; Md Samiul Hoque; Salah Uddin; Abdulla Al Suman; Mohamad Hanif Md Saad; Tanvir Ul Huque
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  A Bibliometric Analysis of Low-Cost Piezoelectric Micro-Energy Harvesting Systems from Ambient Energy Sources: Current Trends, Issues and Suggestions.

Authors:  Mahidur R Sarker; Mohamad Hanif Md Saad; Amna Riaz; M S Hossain Lipu; José Luis Olazagoitia; Haslina Arshad
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.523

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.