| Literature DB >> 34370980 |
HelenMari Merritt-Genore1, Rainer Moosdorf2, Erin Gillaspie3, Sylvain Lother4, Daniel Engelman5, Shahnur Ahmed6, Frank A Baciewicz7, Michael C Grant8, Rita Milewski9, Kelly Cawcutt10, J Awori Hayanga11, Subhasis Chatterjee12, Rakesh C Arora13.
Abstract
EXECUTIVEEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34370980 PMCID: PMC8349423 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.07.016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Thorac Surg ISSN: 0003-4975 Impact factor: 4.330
Comparison of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccines21, 22, 23, 24, 25
| Method of Action | Efficacy 2 Weeks After First Dose(%) | Efficacy After Second Vaccination(%) | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moderna | Messenger RNA | 80 | 94 | Second dose at 4-6 weeks |
| Pfizer | Messenger RNA | 80 | 95 | Second dose at 3-6 weeks |
| Johnson & Johnson | Viral vector vaccine | 66 | One dose | |
| Astra-Zeneca | Viral vector vaccine | 64 | 70 | Second dose between 4 and 12 weeks |
Not presently available in the United States.
Depends on dosage.
Figure 1Incidence of common systemic adverse effects after messenger RNA (mRNA) and viral vector coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination.21, 22, 23, 24, 25, The first and second dose of mRNA vaccines are separated to illustrate differing incidences of reactogenicity.