Sean M Cavany1, Guido España1, Gonzalo M Vazquez-Prokopec2, Thomas W Scott3, T Alex Perkins1. 1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America. 2. Department of Environmental Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America. 3. Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has induced unprecedented reductions in human mobility and social contacts throughout the world. Because dengue virus (DENV) transmission is strongly driven by human mobility, behavioral changes associated with the pandemic have been hypothesized to impact dengue incidence. By discouraging human contact, COVID-19 control measures have also disrupted dengue vector control interventions, the most effective of which require entry into homes. We sought to investigate how and why dengue incidence could differ under a lockdown scenario with a proportion of the population sheltered at home. METHODOLOGY & PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We used an agent-based model with a realistic treatment of human mobility and vector control. We found that a lockdown in which 70% of the population sheltered at home and which occurred in a season when a new serotype invaded could lead to a small average increase in cumulative DENV infections of up to 10%, depending on the time of year lockdown occurred. Lockdown had a more pronounced effect on the spatial distribution of DENV infections, with higher incidence under lockdown in regions with higher mosquito abundance. Transmission was also more focused in homes following lockdown. The proportion of people infected in their own home rose from 54% under normal conditions to 66% under lockdown, and the household secondary attack rate rose from 0.109 to 0.128, a 17% increase. When we considered that lockdown measures could disrupt regular, city-wide vector control campaigns, the increase in incidence was more pronounced than with lockdown alone, especially if lockdown occurred at the optimal time for vector control. CONCLUSIONS & SIGNIFICANCE: Our results indicate that an unintended outcome of lockdown measures may be to adversely alter the epidemiology of dengue. This observation has important implications for an improved understanding of dengue epidemiology and effective application of dengue vector control. When coordinating public health responses during a syndemic, it is important to monitor multiple infections and understand that an intervention against one disease may exacerbate another.
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has induced unprecedented reductions in human mobility and social contacts throughout the world. Because dengue virus (DENV) transmission is strongly driven by human mobility, behavioral changes associated with the pandemic have been hypothesized to impact dengue incidence. By discouraging human contact, COVID-19 control measures have also disrupted dengue vector control interventions, the most effective of which require entry into homes. We sought to investigate how and why dengue incidence could differ under a lockdown scenario with a proportion of the population sheltered at home. METHODOLOGY & PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We used an agent-based model with a realistic treatment of human mobility and vector control. We found that a lockdown in which 70% of the population sheltered at home and which occurred in a season when a new serotype invaded could lead to a small average increase in cumulative DENVinfections of up to 10%, depending on the time of year lockdown occurred. Lockdown had a more pronounced effect on the spatial distribution of DENVinfections, with higher incidence under lockdown in regions with higher mosquito abundance. Transmission was also more focused in homes following lockdown. The proportion of peopleinfected in their own home rose from 54% under normal conditions to 66% under lockdown, and the household secondary attack rate rose from 0.109 to 0.128, a 17% increase. When we considered that lockdown measures could disrupt regular, city-wide vector control campaigns, the increase in incidence was more pronounced than with lockdown alone, especially if lockdown occurred at the optimal time for vector control. CONCLUSIONS & SIGNIFICANCE: Our results indicate that an unintended outcome of lockdown measures may be to adversely alter the epidemiology of dengue. This observation has important implications for an improved understanding of dengue epidemiology and effective application of dengue vector control. When coordinating public health responses during a syndemic, it is important to monitor multiple infections and understand that an intervention against one disease may exacerbate another.
Authors: Abdullatif S Al-Rashed; Reem Al Jindan; Salma Al Jaroodi; Ahmed Al Mohanna; Ahmed Abdelhady; Ayman A El-Badry Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Yuyang Chen; Naizhe Li; José Lourenço; Lin Wang; Bernard Cazelles; Lu Dong; Bingying Li; Yang Liu; Mark Jit; Nikos I Bosse; Sam Abbott; Raman Velayudhan; Annelies Wilder-Smith; Huaiyu Tian; Oliver J Brady Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 71.421
Authors: Mitra Saadatian-Elahi; Neal Alexander; Tim Möhlmann; Farah Diana Ariffin; Frederic Schmitt; Jason H Richardson; Muriel Rabilloud; Nurulhusna Ab Hamid Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-04-06 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Abdul Moiz Sahito; Aqsa Saleem; Syed Owais Javed; Minaam Farooq; Irfan Ullah; Mohammad Mehedi Hasan Journal: Int J Health Plann Manage Date: 2022-03-26