Qiuyuan Wang1,2, Nianfei Zhang1, Wanshou Guo1, Weiguo Wang3, Qidong Zhang4. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, No. 2 Yinghua East Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China. 2. Graduate School of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 11, Bei San Huan Dong Lu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, No. 2 Yinghua East Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China. jointwwg@163.com. 4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, No. 2 Yinghua East Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China. zhangqidong1982@sina.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Operative treatment has become the current trend for displaced intra-articular calcaneus fracture (DIACF), while using cannulated screw fixation or plate fixation is still controversial for treating DIACF. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the outcome of the two fixation methods. METHODS: We searched literature comparing cannulated screw fixation and plate fixation from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Only randomized controlled trials were included. The outcomes of post-operative function, radiological measurement, time efficiency, and wound complications were pooled in the meta-analysis. RESULT: Seven RCTs with 902 cases of DIACF were included. Pooled results showed the two fixation methods that had similar function satisfactory of AOFAS score (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = [0.83, 1.09], P = 0.47, I2 = 0%) and Maryland Foot score (RR = 0.93, 95% CI = [0.68, 1.28], P = 0.66, I2 = 84%). Compared to plate fixation, cannulated screw fixation had better improvement of Bohler's angle (WMD = 0.56, 95% CI = [0.20, 0.91], P = 0.002, I2 = 34%) and Gissane's angle (WMD = 1.36, 95% CI = [0.56, 2.16], P = 0.0008, I2 = 7%), better recovery of calcaneal height (WMD = 0.49, 95% CI = [0.02, 0.95], P = 0.04, I2 = 6%), shorter time to operation (WMD = - 2.91, 95% CI = [- 4.99, - 0.84], P = 0.006, I2 = 97%), less operation time (WMD = - 21.58, 95% CI = [- 37.31, - 5.85], P = 0.007, I2 = 98%), reduced length of hospital stay (WMD = - 2.00, 95% CI = [- 3.69, - 0.31], P = 0.02, I2 = 97%), and less wound complications (RR = 0.16, 95% CI = [0.08, 0.32], P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: Cannulated screw fixation and plate fixation have similar postoperative functional satisfactory. Cannulated screw fixation is superior to plate fixation in reduction quality, time efficiency, and wound complications.
BACKGROUND: Operative treatment has become the current trend for displaced intra-articular calcaneus fracture (DIACF), while using cannulated screw fixation or plate fixation is still controversial for treating DIACF. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the outcome of the two fixation methods. METHODS: We searched literature comparing cannulated screw fixation and plate fixation from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Only randomized controlled trials were included. The outcomes of post-operative function, radiological measurement, time efficiency, and wound complications were pooled in the meta-analysis. RESULT: Seven RCTs with 902 cases of DIACF were included. Pooled results showed the two fixation methods that had similar function satisfactory of AOFAS score (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = [0.83, 1.09], P = 0.47, I2 = 0%) and Maryland Foot score (RR = 0.93, 95% CI = [0.68, 1.28], P = 0.66, I2 = 84%). Compared to plate fixation, cannulated screw fixation had better improvement of Bohler's angle (WMD = 0.56, 95% CI = [0.20, 0.91], P = 0.002, I2 = 34%) and Gissane's angle (WMD = 1.36, 95% CI = [0.56, 2.16], P = 0.0008, I2 = 7%), better recovery of calcaneal height (WMD = 0.49, 95% CI = [0.02, 0.95], P = 0.04, I2 = 6%), shorter time to operation (WMD = - 2.91, 95% CI = [- 4.99, - 0.84], P = 0.006, I2 = 97%), less operation time (WMD = - 21.58, 95% CI = [- 37.31, - 5.85], P = 0.007, I2 = 98%), reduced length of hospital stay (WMD = - 2.00, 95% CI = [- 3.69, - 0.31], P = 0.02, I2 = 97%), and less wound complications (RR = 0.16, 95% CI = [0.08, 0.32], P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: Cannulated screw fixation and plate fixation have similar postoperative functional satisfactory. Cannulated screw fixation is superior to plate fixation in reduction quality, time efficiency, and wound complications.
Authors: Richard Buckley; Suzanne Tough; Robert McCormack; Graham Pate; Ross Leighton; Dave Petrie; Robert Galpin Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Charles C Pitts; Adam Almaguer; John T Wilson; Jonathan H Quade; Michael D Johnson Journal: Foot Ankle Int Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 2.827
Authors: Manouk Backes; Niels W L Schep; Jan S K Luitse; J Carel Goslings; Tim Schepers Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2015-04-26 Impact factor: 3.067