Literature DB >> 34370009

Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMS) in Cardiovascular Disease.

Ran Kornowski1.   

Abstract

In today's medical ecosystem, it is vital to measure the outcomes that are most important to the patients. As such, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMS) can be an essential metric to deliver high-quality cardiovascular care, particularly in the subset of patients who remain disappointed with their outcomes. PROMS should be a reproducible and reflective report of what is fundamental to a patient over time and across treatments with proper standards in the analysis, interpretation, and reporting of the collected data. These reports can also be sensitive to changes, whether improvements or deteriorations in the quality of care and medical attitude, but a lack of standardization makes it difficult to draw robust conclusions and compare findings across treatments. As a research tool, PROMS can have a significant prognostic prominence, offering a powerful instrument of comparison between different treatment modalities. With the information technology (IT) abilities of today, we can leverage mobile tools and powerful computer systems to perform sophisticated data analysis using patient-derived data and randomization. This may eliminate guess work and generate impactful metrics to better inform the decision-making process. PROMS analyzed by proper standardized algorithms can avoid physician bias, and be integrated in the hospital team work. Therefore, there is a strong need for integration of PROMS into the evaluation of cardiovascular interventions and procedures; and also, establish international standards in the analyses of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life Data to address this need and develop therapeutic recommendations.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health-related quality of life (HRQL); High-quality cardiovascular care; Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS)

Year:  2021        PMID: 34370009     DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes        ISSN: 2058-1742


  4 in total

1.  Informed Consent before coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention from the patient's perspective: A picture is worth a thousand words.

Authors:  A Brand; C Crayen; A Hamann; S Martineck; L Gao; H Brand; S M Squier; K Stangl; F Kendel; V Stangl
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-07-01

2.  Predictors of long-term symptom burden and quality of life in patients hospitalised with chest pain: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Nasir Saeed; Tone Merete Norekvål; Ole-Thomas Steiro; Hilde Lunde Tjora; Jørund Langørgen; Rune Oskar Bjørneklett; Øyvind Skadberg; Vernon Vijay Singha Bonarjee; Øistein Rønneberg Mjelva; Torbjørn Omland; Kjell Vikenes; Kristin Moberg Aakre
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Living with a left ventricular assist device: Capturing recipients experiences using group concept mapping software.

Authors:  Anita L Slade; Margaret E O'Hara; David Quinn; Laura Marley; Stephen Griffith; Melanie Calvert; M Sayeed Haque; Hoong Sern Lim; Philippa Doherty; Deirdre A Lane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Self-Reported Mental and Physical Measures in Adult Fontan Patients.

Authors:  Nili Schamroth Pravda; Oren Zusman; Ilan Richter; Leonard Blieden; Shahar Vig; Ilan Marchushamer; Alexander Dadashev; Yaron Razon; Ran Kornowski; Rafael Hirsch
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.