Literature DB >> 34369456

Are Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons Adequately Compensated for Longer Procedures? An Analysis of Relative Value Units and Operative Times From the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

Trevor Simcox1, Jacob Becker1, Jason Kreinces2, Shahidul Islam3, Mark Grossman1, Jason Gould1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The physician work relative value unit (wRVU) scale is the primary determinant of compensation. Operative time, technical skill, effort, and surgical complexity contribute to wRVU allocation. The aim of this study was to identify the relationship between these factors and reimbursement for trauma procedures.
METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for orthopaedic trauma procedures from 2016 to 2018. Physician wRVU data were obtained from the 2020 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services fee schedule. The primary outcome measured was mean wRVU per minute of operative time (wRVU/min). Wilcoxon rank sum test and quantile regression were used to determine the association between wRVU, operative time, complication rate, upper or lower extremity procedure, and wRVU/min.
RESULTS: Sixty-three current procedural terminology codes or 107,171 cases were queried. Median wRVU/min was significantly lower for longest 50% of procedures (0.119 vs. 0.160, P < 0.001) and higher for the top 50% with regard to complication rate (0.161 vs. 0.124, P < 0.001). Upper extremity procedures were reimbursed less than lower extremity (0.110 vs. 0.145, P < 0.001). Quintile regression showed that adjusted for complication rate, median wRVU/min decreased by 0.0005 (95% confidence interval: 0.0007-0.0003, R1 = 0.27, P < 0.001) for every additional minute of operative time.
CONCLUSIONS: The 2020 wRVU scale does not allocate sufficient wRVUs to orthopaedic trauma procedures with longer mean operative time or to procedures performed on the upper extremity. There is a negative correlation between operative time and hourly reimbursement, equating to a decrease of $64.96/h per hour of operation.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34369456     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  2 in total

1.  What is a better value for your time? Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Austen David Katz; Junho Song; Daniel Bowles; Terence Ng; Eric Neufeld; Sayyida Hasan; Dean Perfetti; Nipun Sodhi; David Essig; Jeff Silber; Sohrab Virk
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2022-09-14

2.  Current Relative Value Unit Scale Does Not Appropriately Compensate for Longer Orthopedic Sports Surgeries.

Authors:  Trevor Simcox; Jason Kreinces; Daniel Tarazona; Ioannis Zouzias; Mark Grossman
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-10-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.