Literature DB >> 34369282

The effects of footwear midsole longitudinal bending stiffness on running economy and ground contact biomechanics: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Víctor Rodrigo-Carranza1, Fernando González-Mohíno1,2, Jordan Santos-Concejero3, José María González-Ravé1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to address the effects of increased longitudinal bending stiffness (LBS) on running economy (RE) and running biomechanics. A systematic search on four electronic databases (Pubmed, WOS, Medline and Scopus) was conducted on 26 May 2021. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were included. Standardised mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CI) between footwear with increased LBS vs. non-increased LBS conditions and effect sizes were calculated. To assess the potential effects of moderator variables (type and length plate, increased LBS, shoe mass and running speed) on the main outcome variable (i.e. RE), subgroup analyses were performed. Increased LBS improved RE (SMD = -0.43 [95% CI -0.58, -0.28], Z = 5.60, p < 0.001) compared to non-increased LBS. Significant increases of stride length (SMD = 0.29 [95% CI 0.10, 0.49], Z = 2.93, p = 0.003) and contact time (SMD = 0.17 [95% CI 0.03, 0.31], Z = 2.32, p = 0.02) were found when LBS was increased. RE improved to a greater degree at higher running speeds with footwear with increased LBS. RE improved 3.45% with curve plate compared to no-plate condition without improvements with flat plate shoes. When shoe mass was matched between footwear with increased LBS vs. non-increased LBS conditions, RE improved (3.15%). However, when shoe mass was not controlled (experimental condition with ∼35 grams extra), a significant small improvement was found. These RE improvements appear along with an increase of stride length and contact time. Shoe mass, type of plate (flat or curve) and running speed should be taken into consideration when designing a shoe aimed at improving long-distance running performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon-fibre plate; energy cost of running; performance; vaporfly

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34369282     DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2021.1955014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci        ISSN: 1536-7290            Impact factor:   3.980


  4 in total

1.  Comment on "A Pragmatic Approach to Resolving Technological Unfairness: The Case of Nike's Vaporfly and Alphafly Running Footwear".

Authors:  Víctor Rodrigo-Carranza; Fernando González-Mohíno; Jordan Santos-Concejero; José María González-Ravé
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2021-12-17

2.  Influence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men's marathon from 2015 to 2019.

Authors:  Víctor Rodrigo-Carranza; Fernando González-Mohíno; Jesús Santos Del Cerro; Jordan Santos-Concejero; José María González-Ravé
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The Impact of Grounding in Running Shoes on Indices of Performance in Elite Competitive Athletes.

Authors:  Borja Muniz-Pardos; Irina Zelenkova; Alex Gonzalez-Aguero; Melanie Knopp; Toni Boitz; Martin Graham; Daniel Ruiz; Jose A Casajus; Yannis P Pitsiladis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Effects of footwear with different longitudinal bending stiffness on biomechanical characteristics and muscular mechanics of lower limbs in adolescent runners.

Authors:  Hairong Chen; Enze Shao; Dong Sun; Rongrong Xuan; Julien S Baker; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.755

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.