Literature DB >> 34368894

Fenofibrate increases circulating haematopoietic stem cells in people with diabetic retinopathy: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Benedetta Maria Bonora1,2, Mattia Albiero1,2, Mario Luca Morieri1, Roberta Cappellari1, Francesco Ivan Amendolagine2, Marta Mazzucato1, Alberto Zambon1, Elisabetta Iori1, Angelo Avogaro1, Gian Paolo Fadini3,4.   

Abstract

AIM/HYPOTHESIS: In two large RCTs, fenofibrate reduced the progression of diabetic retinopathy. We investigated whether fenofibrate increases circulating haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs), which have vascular properties and have been shown to protect from retinopathy.
METHODS: We conducted a 12 week parallel-group RCT comparing fenofibrate vs placebo. Patients with diabetic retinopathy and without other conditions that would affect HSPCs were enrolled at a tertiary diabetes outpatient clinic and randomised to receive fenofibrate or placebo based on a computer-generated sequence. Patients and study staff assessing the outcomes were blinded to group assignment. The primary endpoint was the change in the levels of circulating HSPCs, defined by expression of the stem cell markers CD34 and/or CD133. Secondary endpoints were the changes in endothelial progenitor cells, lipids, soluble mediators and gene expression. We used historical data on the association between HSPCs and retinopathy outcomes to estimate the effect of fenofibrate on retinopathy progression.
RESULTS: Forty-two participants with diabetic retinopathy were randomised and 41 completed treatment and were analysed (20 in the placebo group and 21 in the fenofibrate group). Mean age was 57.4 years, diabetes duration was 18.2 years and baseline HbA1c was 60 mmol/mol (7.6%). When compared with placebo, fenofibrate significantly increased levels of HSPCs expressing CD34 and/or CD133. CD34+ HSPCs non-significantly declined in the placebo group (mean ± SD -44.2 ± 31.6 cells/106) and significantly increased in the fenofibrate group (53.8 ± 31.1 cells/106). The placebo-subtracted increase in CD34+ HSPCs from baseline was 30% (99.3 ± 43.3 cells/106; p = 0.027) which, projected onto the relationship between HSPC levels and retinopathy outcomes, yielded an OR of retinopathy progression of 0.67 for fenofibrate vs placebo. Endothelial differentiation of CD34+ cells, estimated by the %KDR (kinase insert domain receptor) expression, was significantly reduced by fenofibrate. Fenofibrate decreased serum triacylglycerols, but the change in triacylglycerols was unrelated to the change in HSPCs. No effect was observed for endothelial progenitor cells, cytokines/chemokines (stromal-cell derived factor-1, vascular endothelial growth factor, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) and gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. CONCLUSIONS/
INTERPRETATION: Fenofibrate increased HSPC levels in participants with diabetic retinopathy and this mechanism may explain why fenofibrate reduced retinopathy progression in previous studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01927315.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiogenesis; Bone marrow; Complications; Haematopoiesis; Regeneration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34368894     DOI: 10.1007/s00125-021-05532-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetologia        ISSN: 0012-186X            Impact factor:   10.122


  40 in total

Review 1.  Ten Emerging Trends in the Epidemiology of Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Charumathi Sabanayagam; WanFen Yip; Daniel S W Ting; Gavin Tan; Tien Y Wong
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 1.648

Review 2.  New insights into the mechanisms of diabetic complications: role of lipids and lipid metabolism.

Authors:  Stephanie Eid; Kelli M Sas; Steven F Abcouwer; Eva L Feldman; Thomas W Gardner; Subramaniam Pennathur; Patrice E Fort
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 3.  Diabetic retinopathy: hyperglycaemia, oxidative stress and beyond.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Hammes
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2017-09-24       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 4.  Strategies to Tackle the Global Burden of Diabetic Retinopathy: From Epidemiology to Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Tien Yin Wong; Charumathi Sabanayagam
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.250

5.  Effects of medical therapies on retinopathy progression in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Emily Y Chew; Walter T Ambrosius; Matthew D Davis; Ronald P Danis; Sapna Gangaputra; Craig M Greven; Larry Hubbard; Barbara A Esser; James F Lovato; Letitia H Perdue; David C Goff; William C Cushman; Henry N Ginsberg; Marshall B Elam; Saul Genuth; Hertzel C Gerstein; Ulrich Schubart; Lawrence J Fine
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Effects of long-term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A Keech; R J Simes; P Barter; J Best; R Scott; M R Taskinen; P Forder; A Pillai; T Davis; P Glasziou; P Drury; Y A Kesäniemi; D Sullivan; D Hunt; P Colman; M d'Emden; M Whiting; C Ehnholm; M Laakso
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-11-26       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Effect of fenofibrate on the need for laser treatment for diabetic retinopathy (FIELD study): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A C Keech; P Mitchell; P A Summanen; J O'Day; T M E Davis; M S Moffitt; M-R Taskinen; R J Simes; D Tse; E Williamson; A Merrifield; L T Laatikainen; M C d'Emden; D C Crimet; R L O'Connell; P G Colman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Are individuals with diabetes seeing better?: a long-term epidemiological perspective.

Authors:  Ronald Klein; Barbara E K Klein
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 9.461

9.  The effects of medical management on the progression of diabetic retinopathy in persons with type 2 diabetes: the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Eye Study.

Authors:  Emily Y Chew; Matthew D Davis; Ronald P Danis; James F Lovato; Letitia H Perdue; Craig Greven; Saul Genuth; David C Goff; Lawrence A Leiter; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; Walter T Ambrosius
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 10.  Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Joanne W Y Yau; Sophie L Rogers; Ryo Kawasaki; Ecosse L Lamoureux; Jonathan W Kowalski; Toke Bek; Shih-Jen Chen; Jacqueline M Dekker; Astrid Fletcher; Jakob Grauslund; Steven Haffner; Richard F Hamman; M Kamran Ikram; Takamasa Kayama; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Sannapaneni Krishnaiah; Korapat Mayurasakorn; Joseph P O'Hare; Trevor J Orchard; Massimo Porta; Mohan Rema; Monique S Roy; Tarun Sharma; Jonathan Shaw; Hugh Taylor; James M Tielsch; Rohit Varma; Jie Jin Wang; Ningli Wang; Sheila West; Liang Xu; Miho Yasuda; Xinzhi Zhang; Paul Mitchell; Tien Y Wong
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Interactions between nuclear receptors glucocorticoid receptor α and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α form a negative feedback loop.

Authors:  Hongjiao Gao; Yujue Li; Xiang Chen
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 2.  Diabetic retinopathy: Involved cells, biomarkers, and treatments.

Authors:  Jiahui Ren; Shuxia Zhang; Yunfeng Pan; Meiqi Jin; Jiaxin Li; Yun Luo; Xiaobo Sun; Guang Li
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 5.988

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.