| Literature DB >> 34367557 |
Andrew D F Simon1, Hannah E Marx2,3, Brian M Starzomski1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plant-pollinator community diversity has been found to decrease under conditions of drought stress; however, research into the temporal dimensions of this phenomenon remains limited. In this study, we investigated the effect of seasonal drought on the temporal niche dynamics of entomophilous flowering plants in a water-limited ecosystem. We hypothesized that closely related native and exotic plants would tend to share similar life history and that peak flowering events would therefore coincide with phylogenetic clustering in plant communities based on expected phenological responses of plant functional types to limitations in soil moisture availability. LOCATION: Galiano Island, British Columbia, Canada.Entities:
Keywords: phenology; phylogenetic community ecology; plant invasion; pollinator ecology; temporal niche dynamics
Year: 2021 PMID: 34367557 PMCID: PMC8328464 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7776
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
FIGURE 1Phylogenetic relationships of entomophilous flowering plants observed on Galiano Island, with labels showing provenance and life history of species
FIGURE 2Mean soil moisture across each site class from April through August, shown with 95% confidence intervals (LMM estimates). Soil moisture was estimated as volumetric water content (%VWC), a ratio of water to soil (m3/m3), using a TDR probe. All differences in wet versus dry site conditions are significant at p = <.001–.001
FIGURE 3(a) Model outputs of counts of flowering shoots across habitats and samples, with 95% confidence intervals. Significant differences between site conditions, both for independent samples and across sample ranges, are marked with letters (a is significantly different from b, x significantly different than y). All differences significant at p = <.001–.02. (b) Model outputs of counts of flowering shoots among native versus exotic plants across habitats and samples, with 95% confidence intervals. Asterisks indicate significant differences between native versus exotic FRA at * (p < .05) and *** (p < .001). ⁂ indicates that significance could not be calculated because only exotic species are present. (c) Standardized effect size of Mean Pairwise Distance (MPD z) calculated for native and exotic plant assemblages across site conditions and samples at the community level; negative values indicate increasingly clustered plant assemblages. Significance indicated at * (p < .05), and ** (p < .01). A bullet (•) marks a near‐significant clustering event (p = .056)
Mean observed soil Volumetric Water Content (%VWC), with standard errors, and mean floral resource availability (FRA) for 12 dominant plant orders exhibiting significant clustering in transects (GLMM estimates)
| Order | Family | N:E | % FRA |
| %VWC | Mean FRA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| April | May | June | July | August | ||||||
| Apiales | Apiaceae | 6:6 | 3 | 2 | 15.2 ± 16.1 | 4 | 14* | 14* | 1 | <1 |
| Asterales | Asteraceae* | 12:26 | 18 | 133 | 8.2 ± 11.7 | 14* | 13 | 53* | 55** | 69** |
| Boraginales | Boraginaceae* | 3:4 | 6 | 8 | 17.1 ± 16.1 | 7* | 60* | 12* | 4 | <1 |
| Brassicales |
Brassicaceae* Tropaeolaceae* | 2:12 | 4 | 7 | 20.1 ± 10.0 | 45* | 7* | 2* | 2 | <1 |
| Caryophyllales |
Caryophyllaceae* Droseraceae Montiaceae* Plumbaginaceae Polygonaceae* | 12:7 | 6 | 12 | 16.3 ± 14.7 | 31* | 34* | 13* | 6 | <1 |
| Dipsacales | Caprifoliaceae* | 5:0 | 3 | 1 | 7.3 ± 9.0 | 2 | 5 | 5* | 1 | |
| Ericales |
Ericaceae* Polemoniaceae Primulaceae* | 14:0 | 8 | 10 | 23.6 ± 25.6 | 4 | 12** | 19* | 8 | <1 |
| Fabales | Fabaceae* | 9:14 | 29 | 38 | 8.0 ± 8.7 | 3 | 84* | 56* | 5* | <1* |
| Geraniales | Geraniaceae* | 0:5 | 1 | 5 | 8.7 ± 7.5 | 2 | 17* | 11* | 3 | <1 |
| Lamiales |
Phrymaceae* Plantaginaceae* Lamiaceae* Lentibulariaceae* Orobanchaceae* Scrophulariaceae* | 16:18 | 7 | 21 | 18.3 ± 17.3 | 18* | 41* | 23* | 12* | 2** |
| Myrtales | Onagraceae* | 7:0 | <1 | 2 | 15.5 ± 17.8 | 4* | 3 | 2 | <1 | |
| Rosales |
Crassulaceae Grossulariaceae Rhamnaceae Rosaceae* | 15:10 | 8 | 5 | 17.4 ± 16.9 | 6 | 37* | 28* | 5* | 1 |
Orders are summarized by family, species richness (native:exotic), their overall (%) contributions to FRA across the landscape, and the number of transects (n) within which taxa are clustered. The timing of significant clustering events in transects, and families implicated, are marked with an asterisk *. Two asterisks ** indicate significant clustering at the community level. Mean observed soil VWC reflects the temporal and spatial niche breadth of each clade, with higher values associated with early‐flowering phenology and wetter environments, and lower levels associated with late phenology and drier environments. See Appendix S4 for more details on the proportional representation of Plant Functional Types blooming within each plant order, across all site conditions and sample periods.
FIGURE 4Standardized effect size of the phylogenetic metric mean nearest taxon distance (MNTD z), calculated for transects, regressed against log‐transformed soil volumetric water content (logVWC)