Literature DB >> 34367158

Sexual Dimorphism and Gender in Infectious Diseases.

Laetitia Gay1, Cléa Melenotte1,2, Ines Lakbar3, Soraya Mezouar1, Christian Devaux1, Didier Raoult1, Marc-Karim Bendiane2, Marc Leone1,3, Jean-Louis Mège1.   

Abstract

Epidemiological studies and clinical observations show evidence of sexual dimorphism in infectious diseases. Women are at less risk than men when it comes to developing most infectious diseases. However, understanding these observations requires a gender approach that takes into account an analysis of both biological and social factors. The host's response to infection differs in males and females because sex differences have an impact on hormonal and chromosomal control of immunity. Estradiol appears to confer protective immunity, while progesterone and testosterone suppress anti-infectious responses. In addition, genetic factors, including those associated with sex chromosomes, also affect susceptibility to infections. Finally, differences in occupational activities, lifestyle, and comorbidities play major roles in exposure to pathogens and management of diseases. Hence, considering sexual dimorphism as a critical variable for infectious diseases should be one of the steps taken toward developing personalized therapeutic approaches.
Copyright © 2021 Gay, Melenotte, Lakbar, Mezouar, Devaux, Raoult, Bendiane, Leone and Mège.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gender; infectious disease; personalized medicine; sex hormones; sexual dimorphism

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34367158      PMCID: PMC8339590          DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.698121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Immunol        ISSN: 1664-3224            Impact factor:   7.561


Introduction

In infectious diseases, the health differences between men and women are a result of interactions between biological and sociocultural factors. Hence, age, comorbidities, genetic predispositions, geographical distribution of pathogens, health behaviors, and hormonal influences are just some of the examples of the diversity of mechanisms explaining sex differences (1). These different factors make it difficult to discriminate what is related to sex as a biological entity and gender as a social construct. Indeed, comorbidities, exposure to pathogens, health behaviors, and access to healthcare interfere with the development of most infectious diseases () (2). Sexual dimorphism also affects the processes, including the immune system, used by the host to fight against infection (3, 4).
Figure 1

Multifactorial mechanisms of gender dimorphism.

Multifactorial mechanisms of gender dimorphism. In infectious diseases, animal models and epidemiological studies provide strong support for sexual dimorphism, whereas mechanistic studies in patients are less conclusive. One reason for this dissociation is that biological studies are too reductionist, do not integrate sociocultural factors, and involve patients of each sex who have already developed the disease. The recent events of the COVID-19 pandemic show the importance of sex differences in susceptibility to viral infections. This review is dedicated to updating the role of sexual dimorphism and gender differences in infectious diseases, here with the goal of providing a mechanistic approach toward infectious diseases.

Search Strategy and Selection Criteria

For the purpose of the current review, we conducted a non-systematic search in Medline (through PubMed) and Google Scholar databases using the following keywords: “sex”, “gender”, “infection”, “bacteria”, “viruses”, “parasites”, “men”, “women”, “ratio”, and “difference”. The search was conducted with no restrictions on language or type of study, from inception to August 2020. A total of 150 references were included in the final qualitative analysis.

Sexual Dimorphism and Anti-Infectious Immunity

Most epidemiological studies have shown that being a man is a risk factor for infectious diseases. Hence, women exhibit a higher ability to recognize pathogens, recruit more innate immune cells, and mount stronger adaptive immune responses than men. As a large body of literature has addressed the role of sexual dimorphism in anti-infectious immunity (5), our aim was to provide a summary of critical immune issues. The innate recognition of pathogens involves numerous membrane and cytosolic molecules, including Toll-like receptors (TLRs). Whereas TLR4 expression is higher in neutrophils and macrophages from males, that of TLR7 is higher in females; this may be related to the hypothesis that X chromosome-encoded TLR7 can escape X inactivation, resulting in higher levels of TLR7 expression in females (5, 6). Notably, X- inactivation escape is also responsible for the female bias in autoimmune diseases (7). Furthermore, sexual dimorphism may affect the regulatory pathway of TLR7. Hence, the CD200 receptor, which is the receptor of the OX-2 glycoprotein, controls TLR7 responses. In its absence, type I interferon (IFN) production and viral clearance are increased in female mice infected with hepatitis coronavirus (8). Also, the lower expression of TLR9 in female mice infected with cytomegalovirus (CMV) likely accounts for the higher susceptibility and lower activation of their immune system (9). The recruitment of innate immune cells is driven by inflammatory mediators. In response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS), circulating mononuclear cells from men produce more tumor necrosis factor (TNF) than those from women (10). This finding is consistent with the observation of sepsis, in which men produce higher inflammatory cytokines and lower anti-inflammatory cytokines than women (11, 12). On the other hand, mononuclear cells from men produce more IL-10, an immunoregulatory cytokine of innate and adaptive immune responses, in response to viral infections via TLR8 and TLR9 pathways, than mononuclear cells of women (13). It should be noted that the reaction to LPS can be influenced by the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, in particular by the cortisol response to acute stress. Female mice were found to have a significantly higher concentration of cortisol when treated with LPS (14). In contrast, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected women showed blunted cortisol response to acute stress (15). Moreover, adaptive immune responses seem more efficient in women than in men. The antibody response of women is usually higher than that of men (16). Women exhibit an increased number of immunoglobulin-producing B cells and higher baseline immunoglobulin levels. The repertoire of B cells has been reported to amplify this difference (17). This is illustrated by differences in antibody repertoire and avidity in men and women following H1N1 vaccination (18). Sexual differences have also been reported when it comes to cellular immune response. Women have higher baseline CD4+ T cell counts and higher CD4+/CD8+ ratios than age-matched men, whereas men have a higher baseline CD8+ T cell number (16). After in vitro stimulation of mononuclear cells, women have been shown to have higher numbers of activated and proliferating T cells (16). It has been established that human leukocytes antigen (HLA) molecules shape the repertoire of T cell receptors (TCRs), as shown by HLA-mediated use of TCR V beta chains. Their use differs in men and women and is likely under steroid control (19). Hence, the fight of the immune system against infectious pathogens relies on sexual dimorphism.

Sex Hormones and Control of Infections

Sex Hormones in Males and Nonpregnant Females

Sex hormones modulate immune responses through specific receptors, which are expressed by most immune cells, including lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells (DCs) (20). After the hormone binds to its receptor, the hormone–receptor complex moves to the nucleus of the immune cell and binds to promoters that contain specific hormonal response elements (21). These hormonal response elements are present in the promoters of several innate immunity genes, suggesting that sex hormones may directly affect the functions of immune cells (). Estradiol has probably been the most extensively investigated sex hormone. Low estradiol concentrations favor Th1-type responses and cell-mediated immunity, whereas high estradiol concentrations induce Th2-type responses and humoral immunity (22, 23). Progesterone and testosterone are known to have broad anti-inflammatory effects and to suppress innate immune responses (22, 24).
Figure 2

Effects of sex hormones on the immune system. Estrogens, progesterone, and androgens may directly affect immune cell functions. Generally, testosterone and progesterone are anti-inflammatory, suppressing several of the immune responses necessary for inflammation, whereas estradiol has bipotential effects: proinflammatory at low concentrations and anti-inflammatory at high concentrations. CCL, CC−chemokine ligand; CXCL, CXC-chemokine ligand; FASL, FAS ligand; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; ND, not defined; NO, nitric oxide; Treg, regulatory T.

Effects of sex hormones on the immune system. Estrogens, progesterone, and androgens may directly affect immune cell functions. Generally, testosterone and progesterone are anti-inflammatory, suppressing several of the immune responses necessary for inflammation, whereas estradiol has bipotential effects: proinflammatory at low concentrations and anti-inflammatory at high concentrations. CCL, CC−chemokine ligand; CXCL, CXC-chemokine ligand; FASL, FAS ligand; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; ND, not defined; NO, nitric oxide; Treg, regulatory T. Sex hormones play an important role in susceptibility to infections, and tuberculosis is one of the most convincing examples, even though the evidence of such is based on unethical experiments. In 1969, research showed that the mortality rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection was markedly lower in castrated men than intact men (25). In contrast, the tuberculosis-associated mortality rate in ovariectomized women is higher than in non-ovariectomized women (7.0% vs. 0.7%) (26). These two studies have shed light on the protective role of castration and the deleterious role of oophorectomy in humans, suggesting that testosterone may favor mycobacterial diseases, whereas estrogen may be protective. In a similar vein, postmenopausal women with low estrogen levels are more susceptible to opportunistic infections, as shown by an increased risk of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial infections (27). It is noteworthy that, in a small group of HIV-infected women treated with hormone replacement therapy, a reduced risk of death was observed (28). Clinical observations are not sufficient to understand the effects of sex hormones in susceptibility to infection, and only experimental models clearly depict the susceptibility and severity of infection as well as its pathophysiological mechanisms (). The castration of male mice reduces host sensitivity to certain infections, whereas the administration of testosterone into female mice increases their susceptibility to these infections (35, 40–43, 49). Estradiol protects female rats against bacterial sepsis and attenuates tissue lesions induced by Helicobacter pylori in mice (31, 32, 37). In Coxiella burnetii infection of mice, tissue infection and granulomatous responses are largely under the control of estrogens: the treatment of ovariectomized mice with 17β-estradiol reduces bacterial loads and granuloma numbers (29). We have clearly shown that the response to C. burnetii infection is sex dependent and that sex hormones are responsible for more than 60% of gene modulation in this specific infection (50). These modulated genes in infected females are involved in the circadian rhythm pathway, such as Clock (down-modulated) and Per (up-regulated), which interfere with the production of estradiol (51). In infected males, modulated genes are associated with an anti-inflammatory response, in particular, IL-10 overproduction, which is known to be associated with a progression toward persistent C. burnetii infection (52, 53).
Table 1

Effect of sex hormones on diseases in animal models.

InfectionsModelsSusceptibility and severityHormonal effectsReferences
BacterialC. burnetiiC57BL/6 miceM > Fovariectomy: resistance lost (29)
oestradiol treatment after ovariectomy: resistance restored
C. trachomatisLewis ratsoestradiol treatment after ovariectomy: ↓susceptibility (30)
progesterone treatment after ovariectomy: ↑susceptibility
E. faecalis (i.e. administration)Wistar ratsoestradiol treatment after ovariectomy: ↑protection against sepsis (31)
H. pyloriINS-GAS miceM > Foestradiol treatment: ↓severity of gastric lesions (32)
L. monocytogenesC57BL/6 miceF > Moestradiol treatment: ↓resistance by inhibiting IL-2 production and subsequent T cell proliferation (33)
M. aviumDBA/2 miceM > Fovariectomy: ↑susceptibility (34)
oestradiol treatment: susceptibility mitigated
M. marinumBALB/c miceM > Fcastration: ↓severity (35)
M. intracellulare
M. tuberculosisBALB/c miceM > Ftestosterone treatment of female or castrated mice: ↑susceptibility (36)
V. vulnificus LPS (intravenous injection)Sprague-Dawley ratsM > Fovariectomy: (37)
↑mortality similar to males
oestradiol treatment after gonadectomy of males and females: ameliorated the severity of disease
ViralHerpes simplex virus (HSV)-2C57BL/6 miceprogesterone treatment in females: ↑susceptibility (38)
↓protective immune response
oestradiol treatment: ↑protection
Simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)Macaquesprogesterone treatment: enhanced SIV vaginal transmission and disease course oestradiol treatment: protect against vaginal transmission of SIV (39)
ParasiticE. histolyticaC57BL/6 miceM > Ftestosterone treatment in females: ↑severity (40, 41)
Syrian hamsterscastration: ↓severity
gonadectomy: inhibition of amoebic liver abscess development
Leishmania spp.Syrian hamstersM > Ftestosterone treatment in females: ↓severity (42)
Plasmodium spp.C57BL/6 miceM > Ftestosterone treatment of females: ↑severity and mortality (43)
castration: resistance
S. mansoniCBA/J miceF > Moestradiol treatment of males: ↑parasite load (44)
T. crassicepsBALB/c miceF > Mcastration: ↑number of parasites (45)
ovariectomy: ↓number of parasites
T. gondiiC57BL/6 miceF > Mtestosterone treatment in females: ↓severity and mortality (46)
oestradiol treatment of males: no effect
castration: dissolves sex bias
FungalC. albicansCFW micemore rapid clearance in femalesgonadectomy: lower initial incidence of infection in females, but not in males in both sexes: ↑clearance of candiduria (47)
P. brasiliensisC57BL/6 miceM > Foestradiol treatment after castration: ↓IL-10, ↓severity testosterone treatment after ovariectomy: ↑IL-10 (48)
↗ clearance in females

Susceptibility to infection and the effects of sex hormones are described by comparing males (M) and females (F). The term ovariectomy is used only in the case of females, the term castration only for males and the term gonadectomy when it is used on males and females.

Effect of sex hormones on diseases in animal models. Susceptibility to infection and the effects of sex hormones are described by comparing males (M) and females (F). The term ovariectomy is used only in the case of females, the term castration only for males and the term gonadectomy when it is used on males and females. Some pathogens have evolved mechanisms that can manipulate host sex hormone production (21). Schistosoma haematobium produces an estrogenic compound that antagonizes both the signaling and expression of estrogen receptors, favoring its replication (54). Similarly, Taenia crassiceps enzymatically reduces testosterone concentrations and increases estradiol concentrations, and these effects promote the reproduction of parasites in male rodents (55). Androgen response elements have been identified in hepatitis B virus (HBV), allowing testosterone to affect HBV replication by direct binding to these elements (56). Interestingly, the genome of human papillomavirus (HPV) high-risk types 16 and 18 contains a progesterone response pattern that can stimulate HPV replication, playing an important role in the HPV-induced transformation process (57). Thus, increased progesterone concentrations may explain the higher frequency of malignant HPV lesions in women than in men. Progesterone inhibits the transition of Candida albicans into a hyphal form, whereas estradiol stimulates this transition, increasing fungal virulence (58). In fact, an important corpus of data clearly indicates that sex hormones play a major role in host defense and microorganism lifecycles.

Sex Hormones in Pregnant Women

Pregnancy is a period of major hormonal change with a peculiar susceptibility to infections and a risk of complications for the fetus and mother. During the first trimester, the risk of transmitting infections to the fetus is rare but often results in miscarriage, while infections in the third trimester can result in maternofetal complications () (3, 71). Susceptibility to listeriosis, toxoplasmosis, candidiasis, and HIV infection is known to increase during pregnancy (72). The risk of contracting listeriosis is 20 times higher in pregnant women than in nonpregnant women, and the risk of toxoplasmosis seroconversion increases by 2.2 times during pregnancy (3).
Table 2

Infections that cause adverse pregnancy or foetal outcomes.

InfectionsMost at-risk trimesterMaternal clinical manifestations and severityMaternal risk of mortalityFoetal riskReferences
BacterialB. melitensis1st trimesterno specific clinical signyesspontaneous abortion (59)
preterm birth
congenital brucellosis
mortality
C. burnetii2–3rd trimesterhigher risk of persistent C. burnetii infectionyesintrauterine growth restriction (60, 61)
spontaneous abortion
preterm birth
foetal demise
L. monocytogenes3rd trimestersepsis, meningitis, rhombencephalitisunknownspontaneous abortion (3, 62)
preterm birth
serious neonatal disease
foetal demise
C. trachomatisallno specific clinical signunknownspontaneous abortion (63)
preterm birth
premature rupture of membranes
low birth weight
Group B Streptococcusdeliverybacteraemia, sepsis pyelonephritis,unknownpreterm birth (64)
neonatal infection: sepsis, meningitis, pneumonia
ViralZika1st trimesterno specific clinical signunknownmicrocephaly (65, 66)
ocular abnormalities
foetal demise
Parvovirus B191st and 2nd trimestersacute arthritis and arthralgiasunknownspontaneous abortion (67)
foetal complications (severe anaemia, hydrops fetalis)
Hepatitis B3rd trimesterno specific clinical signunknownlow birth weight (68)
preterm birth
perinatal transmission
Hepatitis E3rd trimesterfulminant hepatic failureyespreterm birth (69)
mortality
Herpes simplex virus3rd trimesterno specific clinical signunknownspontaneous abortion (69)
intrauterine growth restriction
congenital and neonatal herpes infections
Influenza virus3rd trimestersevere disease, pneumonia, cardiopulmonary eventyesspontaneous abortion (70)
preterm birth
mortality
Measles virus3rd trimestersevere disease, respiratory complications, pneumonia, encephalitisyesspontaneous abortion (3)
preterm birth
congenital defects
Varicella virus3rd trimestersevere disease, pneumoniayesmortality (69)
congenital varicella syndrome
CMVallno specific clinical signunknownintrauterine growth restriction (69)
congenital infection
mortality
Ebola virusallsevere bleedingyesspontaneous abortion (69)
preterm birth
ParasiticPlasmodium spp.first half of pregnancysevere anaemia, renal failure, higher frequency of lymphadenopathyyeslow birth weight (3)
intrauterine growth restriction
preterm birth
T. gondii1st trimesterno specific clinical signunknowncongenital diseases (microcephaly, intracranial calcifications) (3)

Infections that can cause adverse pregnancy or foetal outcomes and are described according to the stage of pregnancy.

Infections that cause adverse pregnancy or foetal outcomes. Infections that can cause adverse pregnancy or foetal outcomes and are described according to the stage of pregnancy. Infection severity is increased in pregnant women; they are seven times more likely to be hospitalized, twice more likely to die from an influenza virus, and three times more likely to develop severe dengue and lethal Plasmodium falciparum infections than nonpregnant women (3, 73–75). Pregnancy complications have been identified in more than 50% of pregnant women infected with C. burnetii infection (4). They include spontaneous abortion (26%), premature delivery (45%), or intrauterine growth restriction (5.3%) (4, 60, 61). Although women likely seem to be protected from infectious risk via estrogens, clinical observations suggest that, during pregnancy, high concentrations of estrogens are detrimental for the host response to infection ().
Figure 3

Hormone levels and immune responses during the menstrual cycle and pregnancy. Increased hormonal concentrations during pregnancy contribute to the immune shifts to support a successful pregnancy but also increase the susceptibility of women to infectious disease.

Hormone levels and immune responses during the menstrual cycle and pregnancy. Increased hormonal concentrations during pregnancy contribute to the immune shifts to support a successful pregnancy but also increase the susceptibility of women to infectious disease. During the third trimester, high concentrations of estradiol and progesterone prevent efficient Th1 immune responses and promote immunoregulatory Th2 immune responses, which is essential for the success of the fetal graft (76, 77). Unfortunately, the expansion of Th2 cells, which are known to decrease the robustness of protective cell-mediated immunity, is also, at least partially, responsible for altered immune responses to infections, which may account for the prevalence and severity of infections during pregnancy (78, 79).

Genetic Factors and Sexual Dimorphism

Although the Y-chromosome, which is found only in men, encodes about 100 genes, 1,100 genes are expressed on the X-chromosome, which is shared by both men and women, including a large number of genes related to innate and adaptive immune systems. Among them there are genes encoding pattern recognition receptors (such as TLR7 and TLR8) (80) or transcriptional effectors (NF-κB) (81). To prevent excessive X-chromosome responses in women, one of the two X-chromosomes is inactivated. However, 15% of the X genes escape inactivation, and their copy number is higher in women than in men, which accounts for the increased risk of autoimmunity in women (6, 82). Similarly, the sex chromosomes show an unbalanced microRNA (miRNA) repartition. Indeed, the X-chromosome contains 113 miRNAs (10% of all miRNAs), whereas only two miRNAs are found in the Y-chromosome (83). These miRNAs, which are involved in the response to infection, are critical regulators of the immune response (84). As an example, mRNA-223 controls susceptibility to M. tuberculosis infection by regulating lung neutrophil recruitment (85). The incomplete inactivation of the X-chromosome leads to a higher expression of miRNAs in women. These differences attributable to X-chromosome inactivation contribute to sex differences in immune responses and, therefore, in susceptibility to infections. However, murine models could be considered biased for sex hormone analysis. The four core genotype mouse model enables the study of differences in gene expression solely due to sex chromosome complement without involvement of sex hormones (86). Such an approach is useful to assess the role of IL-1 receptor-associated kinase-1 (IRAK1), CD40 ligand (CD40LG), C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 3, and IL13RA1 or TLR7 genes known to escape the X-related inactivation process in infectious diseases (6, 87–89). These findings highlight enhanced female immune response to infectious agents through the involvement of X-chromosome-linked genes. Chromosome polymorphism affects the severity of infections. Indeed, a single nucleotide polymorphism in the X-chromosome is associated with slow progression to AIDS in women but not in men (90). TLR8 gene polymorphisms on X chromosomes are related to susceptibility to tuberculosis, particularly in boys (91, 92). Other genetic variations independent of sex chromosomes participate in sexual dimorphism, including IL-6 promoter polymorphisms associated with the development of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, which is primarily reported in men (93). In contrast, different polymorphisms in the gene encoding CTLA-4 associated with HCV infection recovery are more frequent in women (94). In the context of COVID-19, it has been shown that the ACE-2 receptor, known to recognize SARS-CoV2, is encoded by the X chromosome, which may partly explain the sexual dimorphism of COVID-19 (95). Genetic variations in the Y-chromosome increase mouse susceptibility to influenza A virus infection (96) and have a direct effect on the survival of coxsackievirus B3-infected mice (97). Genes encoding resistance to Plasmodium chabaudi, Leishmania mexicana, or mousepox infection have been identified in mice on autosomal chromosomes (), and these loci confer greater resistance to females (98–100). Thus, genetic resistance to infection is partly sex dependent, but this association requires further investigation.
Table 3

Genetic susceptibility to infections in mice.

InfectionsGenetic variationEffect of genetic variationReferences
Influenza A viruschromosome Y↗ susceptibility to infection of males (96)
↗ pathogenic immune responses in lungs
Coxsackievirus B3chromosome Y↗ mortality in infected males (97)
Resistance genesEffect of resistance genes
P. chabaudiChar 1-4greater resistance of females (Char 2, Char 4) (98)
L. mexicanaScl-2greater resistance of females (99)
MousepoxRmp1–4greater resistance of females (Rmp 2, Rmp 4) (100)

Genetic variations in the Y chromosome influence the survival of male mice following influenza A virus and coxsackievirus B3 infection. Resistance genes have been identified, and the effects of these genes confer greater resistance to infections for female mice.

Genetic susceptibility to infections in mice. Genetic variations in the Y chromosome influence the survival of male mice following influenza A virus and coxsackievirus B3 infection. Resistance genes have been identified, and the effects of these genes confer greater resistance to infections for female mice.

Sexual Dimorphism in Infectious Diseases: Clinical Evidence

Epidemiological studies and clinical observations provide clear evidence of sexual bias in infectious diseases and offer insights into exploring the role of sexual dimorphism in infectious diseases. These studies refer to the differences of susceptibility and clinical presentation in men and women according to the site of infection or the nature of the microorganism.

Sexual Dimorphism Related to the Site of Infection

The incidence of urinary tract infections, genital infections, infective endocarditis, and respiratory tract infections differs between men and women. We have summarized the main findings about sexual dimorphism in infections in which anatomical differences might play a role in .
Figure 4

Infection prevalence according to anatomical characteristics. Data extracted from a long-term cohort followed in our institution.

Infection prevalence according to anatomical characteristics. Data extracted from a long-term cohort followed in our institution. Urinary tract infections are the most frequent infections worldwide, occurring in 53,067 cases per 100,000 women and 13,689 cases per 100,000 men. Women from the ages of 16 to 35 are about 35 times more likely to develop urinary tract infections than men (101). Although anatomical differences have long been proposed as the main explanation for the predominance of women experiencing more urinary tract infections, other factors are emerging that more fully explain the increased risk of urinary tract infections in women; these factors include sexual intercourse, antimicrobial exposure, estrogenic status, contraception influencing the vaginal microbiota, and any intervention resulting in the loss of normally protective Lactobacillus spp (102, 103). The distribution of the causative agents of urinary tract infections also differs in men and women: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, and Streptococcus agalactiae are more frequently found in women, whereas Enterococcus faecalis, Proteus mirabilis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are more often found in men (104). Cellular factors also differ according to sex. Hence, the epithelial cells of the penile skin appear to be more resistant to HPV infection than the cervical epithelium, the former being keratinized and the latter mucosal (105). Infective endocarditis exhibits a male/female (M/F) sex ratio above two (106). The site of infection, which is the injured valve, is more often the mitral valves in women (50% vs. 36%, p = 0.02) and the aortic valves in men (46% vs. 31%, p = 0.02) (106). Infective endocarditis-associated in-hospital death is higher in women than in men. Nevertheless, it is difficult to establish an association between sex and both the site of infection and increased risk of infective endocarditis, because age and comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus are likely involved (106, 107). Men develop lower respiratory tract infections more frequently than women, as shown in a two-year European prospective study evaluating the incidence of community-acquired pneumonia (16 vs. 9 cases per 10,000 person-years) (108, 109). In contrast, sinusitis and tonsillitis are more frequent in women than in men; here, the smaller size of paranasal sinus ostia in women may account for such dimorphism (110).

Sexual Dimorphism Related to Microorganisms

In general, men are more affected by bacterial and parasitic infections than women, with the exception of Escherichia coli, Borrelia burgdorferi and Chlamydia trachomatis. In this section, we focus on infectious diseases for which a pronounced sexual dimorphism has been reported at clinical and epidemiological levels.

Bacterial Infections

Numerous infections caused by intracellular pathogens, such as M. tuberculosis, C. burnetii, Legionella sp., and Brucella sp., exhibit unbalanced M/F ratios (). We illustrate this point with three examples. Tuberculosis (defined by a clinical diagnosis of tuberculosis disease) exhibits a global M/F ratio of 1.7 (112). Although it is estimated that one-third of the world’s population has latent M. tuberculosis infections, it is also estimated that asymptomatic carriage affects more men than women (33% vs. 25%) (113). Among both HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals, tuberculosis-related mortality is higher in men than in women, with an M/F ratio of 1.8 to 1.9, which is partly related to differences in gender access to healthcare (112). Interestingly, women more often develop extrapulmonary forms of the disease, with M/F ratios ranging from 1:1.7 to 1:2.9 in low-income countries (114).
Figure 5

Sex differences in the prevalence of infections. The male-to-female (M/F) ratios for different (A) bacterial, (B) parasitic and fungal, and (C) viral infections are presented. T. whipplei infection occurs in six men for every one woman, but prevalence is similar between men and women for Toxoplasma gondii infection, whereas anal HPV infections are more frequent in women. Data extracted from (111).

Sex differences in the prevalence of infections. The male-to-female (M/F) ratios for different (A) bacterial, (B) parasitic and fungal, and (C) viral infections are presented. T. whipplei infection occurs in six men for every one woman, but prevalence is similar between men and women for Toxoplasma gondii infection, whereas anal HPV infections are more frequent in women. Data extracted from (111). From the French National Reference Centre for Q fever, the sexual dimorphism was more pronounced during C. burnetii persistent focal infection (M/F sex ratio: 2.8) than during acute Q fever (M/F sex ratio: 2.2). The M/F sex ratio reached 7.5 in patients with vascular C. burnetii infection, independent of age, whereas the sex ratio related to mortality was 3.8 (4, 115). These differences were not found in children, in whom boys represented 47% of the cohort () (4). In addition, being male was associated with a higher risk of exhibiting G-isotype anticardiolipin antibodies, which are associated with acute Q fever complications (OR 1.6 [1.3–2.1], p < 0.001) (116).
Figure 6

Percentage of patients with persistent C. burnetii infection regarding sex and age. The proportion of men and women patients for (A) all persistent C. burnetii infections, (B) C. burnetii endocarditis, and (C) vascular C. burnetii infections are presented. In children, persistent C. burnetii infection affects girls and boys similarly, whereas adult men are mostly affected. After 40 years of age, men represent more than 70% of patients.

Percentage of patients with persistent C. burnetii infection regarding sex and age. The proportion of men and women patients for (A) all persistent C. burnetii infections, (B) C. burnetii endocarditis, and (C) vascular C. burnetii infections are presented. In children, persistent C. burnetii infection affects girls and boys similarly, whereas adult men are mostly affected. After 40 years of age, men represent more than 70% of patients. Tropheryma whipplei is a bacterium that causes a rare, chronic, and systemic disease: Whipple’s disease. The classical presentation of the disease is characterized by malabsorption syndrome and arthralgias (117). The M/F ratio is 6.0 (118). In rural communities in Gabon, the prevalence of T. whipplei is 23% in men and 16% in women (p = 0.05), and being a man is identified as a risk factor for T. whipplei asymptomatic carriage (OR 1.6, p < 0.05) (119). Sexual dimorphism is also found for cancers associated with bacterial infections () (120–125). Compared with women, men have a higher incidence of gastric adenocarcinoma associated with H. pylori infection and non-Hodgkin lymphomas associated with C. burnetii infection than women (122, 123). In contrast, women are more susceptible than men to developing ocular adnexal lymphoma associated with Chlamydia psittaci infection and primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas associated with Borrelia burgdorferi infection (124, 125).
Figure 7

Percentage of cancer cases attributable to infectious agents by sex. Sex disparities are observed in infection-associated cancers. Globally, men are more likely to develop cancer because of infection, except in a few cases, such as HPV infection.

Percentage of cancer cases attributable to infectious agents by sex. Sex disparities are observed in infection-associated cancers. Globally, men are more likely to develop cancer because of infection, except in a few cases, such as HPV infection. Overall, bacterial infections and their consequences, such as infection-associated cancers, are more pronounced in men.

Parasitic and Fungal Infections

Sexual differences are particularly pronounced in parasitic infections () (126–128). Although asymptomatic carriage of Entamoeba histolytica is similar in both sexes, invasive amoebiasis affects a higher proportion of men than women (126). Men are also more affected by P. falciparum and Plasmodium vivax infections than women, whereas the mortality associated with P. falciparum is higher in women than in men (18% vs. 7.6%). This observation could be partly explained by anemia along with immunological differences, which is more frequent in pregnant women than in nonpregnant women, the latter being associated with increased mortality in P. falciparum infection (127). There are sex differences in the incidence or manifestations of fungal infections. In paracoccidioidomycosis, this is caused by the fungus Paracoccidioides brasiliensis, where the M/F ratio is extremely high () (128). As reported for bacterium-associated cancer, parasite-associated cancer exhibits sexual dimorphism. Men account for more than two-thirds of the cases of cholangiocarcinoma associated with Opisthorchis viverrini and Clonorchis sinensis and are more affected by urinary bladder cancer caused by Schistosomia haematobium (129, 130).

Viral Infections

Sexual dimorphism is classically less pronounced in viral infections, albeit differences between men and women have been reported () (74, 131, 132). HBV and HCV infections are more frequent in men. Women spontaneously clear HCV more efficiently than men (45% vs. 34%) (131, 133). Finally, some disparities have been observed in infections caused by HIV-1. The HIV-1 viral load in untreated women is up to 40% lower than in men, but progression to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) is faster in women at similar viremia levels, partly because of increased immune activation in women. Sex differences have been reported in the incidence and severity of dengue virus infection. The incidence of this infection is higher in men than in women (from 1.5:1 to 2.5:1) (134). In a report from Fiji, men were more likely to develop a lethal presentation than women (63% of deaths occurring in men) (135). These data could partly be explained by a higher occupational exposure in men, but also by a sex dimorphism in the antibody enhancement process. In fact, pre-existing sub-neutralizing levels of antibodies, through Fcγ receptor interaction, can lead to increased intracellular viral uptake and enhanced infection (136). This is illustrated by enhanced dengue severity mediated by maternally acquired heterotypic dengue antibodies (137). However, more animal and clinical studies are needed to explore sex differences in this phenomenon. A sexual dimorphism has been identified in COVID-19 infections. Men were significantly more represented in the group of critical and deceased COVID-19 patients. Conversely, being a woman was associated with a reduced risk of death and a reduced risk of disease progression (138, 139). In fact, SARS-CoV-2 binds to ACE-2, a protein encoded by the genes of the X-chromosome (95), which is one of the hypotheses for explaining the sexual dimorphism observed in this disease. Recently, we identified an almost exclusively male population suffering from severe COVID-19 and characterized by the neutralization of type I IFN via inborn defects or the presence of antitype 1 IFN auto-antibodies (140). It has also been shown that post-acute COVID-19 syndrome is more likely to occur in women than in men. Finally, there is sexual dimorphism in virus-associated cancers, as reported for cancers associated with bacteria or parasites (141–143). After viral hepatitis, men have a two- to four-fold increased risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (141). Similarly, after human T cell leukemia virus type 1 infection, men can be up to 3.5 times more susceptible to developing adult T cell leukemia than women (142, 143).

Sexual Dimorphism From a Gender Perspective

Although hormonal and chromosomic hypotheses are tempting to consider, they cannot explain all the features of sexual dimorphism in infectious diseases. Because of the intricacy of social and biological mechanisms in sex-associated susceptibility to infections, it is necessary to evaluate the influence of sociocultural factors, both at the contextual and individual levels. The latter are critical for analyzing the biological studies in which they may be confounded. The historical and social organization that is partly based on gender roles may put men and women at risk of contracting specific infections in different ways. Mine workers are five to six times more likely to contract tuberculosis than the general population (144). People working in sewage treatment are exposed to T. whipplei; dockworkers, fishermen, or oyster shuckers to Vibrio sp. infection; slaughterhouse workers to Q fever; and farmers to brucellosis (145, 146). Slaughterhouse workers and farmers are predominantly male in developing countries (67%), while in industrialized countries, men and women are equally represented in these occupations (147). In the case of schistosomiasis, boys are infected more often than girls (ratio at 1.8), a difference persisting in adults (ratio at 1.5). This is partly explained by the more frequent bathing of boys in stagnant waters (148–150). There is no occupational exposure to C. burnetii (4, 151) at variance with brucellosis and bilharziosis (150, 152, 153). In sex workers, sexually transmitted infections are more frequent in women than in men, and women sex workers are 13.5 times more likely to contract HIV than other women aged 15–49 years old, even in countries with a high HIV prevalence (154, 155). In developed countries, Treponema pallidum infection affects men in 88% to 96% of cases, most of them being men who have sex with men (58% to 82%) (156). Moreover, at the individual level, health behaviors such as healthy lifestyle habits or healthcare-seeking behaviors could explain the gap in vulnerability that can be observed between women and men in terms of specific infectious diseases. Comorbidities and lifestyle habits influence susceptibility to infections. Consumption of alcohol and tobacco increases the risk of infections, and their complications are higher in men than in women (157). Alcohol consumption is a risk factor for tuberculosis and accelerates liver fibrosis in HCV-infected individuals (158). Smoking is a risk factor for infectious lung diseases, accounting for up to 30% of the variance in the sex ratio of pulmonary tuberculosis notifications (159). In South India, the risk of progression toward pulmonary tuberculosis shows an M/F ratio of 2.7, whereas the exclusion of smokers and alcohol users reduces the M/F ratio to 1.2 (160). Also, high blood pressure and diabetes mellitus are more common in men than women (161, 162). Finally, gender disparities in the use of healthcare services may influence the course of infectious diseases. For tuberculosis, prevalence surveys show that men are underdiagnosed as compared with women, suggesting that men may be less likely to seek or access healthcare than women (112, 163). Consequently, male tuberculosis cases may be underestimated in some countries (112, 163). Similarly, antiretroviral therapy coverage among people living with HIV is higher among women (52%) than men (41%) (132). This gender gap is likely related to gender norms. Among adult men, the delayed initiation of treatment and reduced adherence to treatment contribute to an increased number of deaths (132).

Conclusion

Infections are multifactorial diseases whose exposition and evolution are influenced by social organization and health behaviors. Biological determinants also influence the course of infectious diseases, which are partially dictated by immune response and subjected to hormonal influences and chromosomal predispositions. Thus, susceptibility to infections changes over the course of an individual’s life. After puberty, women are initially less susceptible to infectious diseases because of their ability to mobilize and activate innate and adaptive immune responses, whereas during pregnancy, an immunoregulatory Th2 immune response is promoted. In men, testosterone has immunosuppressive properties. In addition, genetic factors determine the outcome of infections and are involved in susceptibility and resistance to microbial agents. Some microorganisms have developed strategies that take advantage of hormonal or chromosomal influences to survive and multiply. Therefore, sexual dimorphism needs to be integrated into the development of anti-infectious treatments.

Author Contributions

Data curation: LG, CM, IL. Supervision: J-LM, ML. Writing – original draft: LG, CM, IL, M-KB. Writing – review and editing: SM, CD, DR, J-LM, ML. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

ML served as speaker for MSD, Aspen and as consultant for Amomed, Ambuand Gilead. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  155 in total

Review 1.  Pregnancy and pregnancy-associated hormones alter immune responses and disease pathogenesis.

Authors:  Dionne P Robinson; Sabra L Klein
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 3.587

2.  Glucocorticoid-immune response to acute stress in women and men living with HIV.

Authors:  Liisa Hantsoo; Sara Kornfield; Claudia Iannelli; Jessica Podcasy; David Metzger; Mary D Sammel; C Neill Epperson
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2019-03-19

3.  17 β-estradiol suppresses Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric pathology in male hypergastrinemic INS-GAS mice.

Authors:  Masahiro Ohtani; Zhongming Ge; Alexis García; Arlin B Rogers; Sureshkumar Muthupalani; Nancy S Taylor; Shilu Xu; Koichiro Watanabe; Yan Feng; Robert P Marini; Mark T Whary; Timothy C Wang; James G Fox
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 4.944

4.  Global burden of cancers attributable to infections in 2012: a synthetic analysis.

Authors:  Martyn Plummer; Catherine de Martel; Jerome Vignat; Jacques Ferlay; Freddie Bray; Silvia Franceschi
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 26.763

Review 5.  Surveillance and epidemiology of hepatitis B and C in Europe - a review.

Authors:  Merja Rantala; M J W van de Laar
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2008-05-22

6.  MicroRNA-223 controls susceptibility to tuberculosis by regulating lung neutrophil recruitment.

Authors:  Anca Dorhoi; Marco Iannaccone; Maura Farinacci; Kellen C Faé; Jörg Schreiber; Pedro Moura-Alves; Geraldine Nouailles; Hans-Joachim Mollenkopf; Dagmar Oberbeck-Müller; Sabine Jörg; Ellen Heinemann; Karin Hahnke; Delia Löwe; Franca Del Nonno; Delia Goletti; Rosanna Capparelli; Stefan H E Kaufmann
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  Liver fluke-associated cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  P Watanapa; W B Watanapa
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Characterizing the pregnancy immune phenotype: results of the viral immunity and pregnancy (VIP) study.

Authors:  Thomas A Kraus; Stephanie M Engel; Rhoda S Sperling; Lisa Kellerman; Yungtai Lo; Sylvan Wallenstein; Maria M Escribese; Jose L Garrido; Tricia Singh; Martine Loubeau; Thomas M Moran
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 8.317

9.  Testosterone increases susceptibility to amebic liver abscess in mice and mediates inhibition of IFNγ secretion in natural killer T cells.

Authors:  Hannelore Lotter; Elena Helk; Hannah Bernin; Thomas Jacobs; Cornelia Prehn; Jerzy Adamski; Nestor González-Roldán; Otto Holst; Egbert Tannich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  COVID-19 gender susceptibility and outcomes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ines Lakbar; David Luque-Paz; Jean-Louis Mege; Sharon Einav; Marc Leone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  The Multifaceted Role of Mating Type of the Fungus and Sex of the Host in Studies of Fungal Infections in Humans.

Authors:  Nada Kraševec
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-29

2.  Characterization of lncRNA-Based ceRNA Network and Potential Prognostic Hub Genes for Sepsis.

Authors:  Yiqing Tong; Yanping Yang; Qiming Feng
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Distinct type I interferon responses between younger women and older men contribute to the variability of COVID-19 outcomes: Hypothesis generating insights from COVID-19 convalescent individuals.

Authors:  Clio P Mavragani; Charalampos Skarlis; Ioannis V Kostopoulos; Eirini Maratou; Paraskevi Moutsatsou; Evangelos Terpos; Ourania E Tsitsilonis; Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos; Petros P Sfikakis
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 4.  Contribution of Sex Differences to HIV Immunology, Pathogenesis, and Cure Approaches.

Authors:  Jose A Moran; Shireen R Turner; Matthew D Marsden
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 8.786

5.  Humoral immune response after COVID-19 infection or BNT162b2 vaccine among older adults: evolution over time and protective thresholds.

Authors:  Maxence Meyer; Florentin Constancias; Claudia Worth; Anita Meyer; Marion Muller; Alexandre Boussuge; Georges Kaltenbach; Elise Schmitt; Saïd Chayer; Aurélie Velay; Thomas Vogel; Samira Fafi-Kremer; Patrick Karcher
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 7.581

Review 6.  The Reserve/Maximum Capacity of Melatonin's Synthetic Function for the Potential Dimorphism of Melatonin Production and Its Biological Significance in Mammals.

Authors:  Dun-Xian Tan; Rüdiger Hardeland
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Machine learning for infection risk prediction in postoperative patients with non-mechanical ventilation and intravenous neurotargeted drugs.

Authors:  Yi Du; Haipeng Shi; Xiaojing Yang; Weidong Wu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Mainstreaming Gender-Responsive One Health: Now Is the Time.

Authors:  Julie Garnier; Sara Savić; Natalia Cediel; Paola Barato; Elena Boriani; Brigitte Bagnol; Richard Anthony Kock
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-12

9.  Towards a Fungal Science That Is Independent of Researchers' Gender.

Authors:  Nada Kraševec
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 10.  Risk Factors for Infections, Antibiotic Therapy, and Its Impact on Cancer Therapy Outcomes for Patients with Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Ondřej Kubeček; Pavla Paterová; Martina Novosadová
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.