| Literature DB >> 34367075 |
Yu Min1, Yizhou Huang2, Minjie Wei3, Xiaoyuan Wei4, Hang Chen1, Xing Wang1, Jialin Chen1, Ke Xiang1, Yang Feng1, Guobing Yin1.
Abstract
Background: The preoperative distinguishment of lymph nodes with reactive hyperplasia or tumor metastasis plays a pivotal role in guiding the surgical extension for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) with Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT), especially in terms of the central lymph node (CLN) dissection. We aim to identify the preparative risk factors for CLN metastasis in PTC patients concurrent with HT. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: central lymph node metastasis; nomogram; risk factor; thyroid carcinoma; ultrasound characteristics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34367075 PMCID: PMC8339927 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.713475
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Figure 1The patient selection process for the present study. Patients with no lymph node examined (n = 12*): CLND was not performed or lymph node was not found in the postoperative histopathological examinations.
The definitions of the preoperative ultrasound features.
| Preoperative ultrasound features | Definition and evaluation |
|---|---|
|
| |
| primary tumor size | the largest tumor diameter ≤1 cm and >1 cm |
| Multifocality | more than two primary tumor focuses |
| aspect ratio | anteroposterior diameter |
| tumor location | left, right, isthmus, and bilateral of the thyroid gland |
| tumor longitudinal location | upper, middle, and lower of the thyroid gland |
| tumor composition | cystic, solid, and solid with cystic |
| tumor boundary | clear and unclear |
| margin | smooth, semi-regular, and irregular |
| ¥calcification | no calcification, microcalcification, and macrocalcification. |
| echogenicity | hypoechoic, isoechoic, and hyperechoic |
| capsular relation | invasion or not |
| blood flow | avascularity, peripheral vascularity, limited vascularity, and strip-like vascularity |
|
| |
| lymphadenopathy | positive and negative |
| margin | regular and irregular |
| &lymph cortex | thinning, normal, and thickening |
| lymphatic hilum | normal, unclear, and disappear |
| calcification | no calcification, microcalcification, and macrocalcification. |
| blood flow | avascularity, peripheral vascularity, limited vascularity, and strip-like vascularity |
¥Calcification: microcalcification: <1 mm in diameter, and macrocalcification: >1 mm in diameter; microcalcification is prior to macrocalcification if the tumor presences of both microcalcification and macrocalcification. &Lymph cortex: thinning: the thickness of the cortex is less than half of the diameter of hyperechoic area, normal, thickening: the thickness of the cortex is more than half of the diameter of hyperechoic area.
Clinicopathological features of 214 PTC patients with HT.
| Variables | Subgroup | % of patients |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| With CLNMM | Without CLNM | |||
|
| male | 8 | 2 |
|
| female | 92 | 98 | ||
|
| <55 | 83 | 84 |
|
| ≥55 | 17 | 16 | ||
|
| Han | 97 | 96 |
|
| Non-Han | 3 | 4 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| <1 cm | 63 | 78 |
|
| ≥1 cm | 37 | 22 | ||
|
| No | 9 | 8 |
|
| Yes | 83 | 74 | ||
| N/A | 8 | 18 | ||
|
| No | 64 | 72 |
|
| Yes | 36 | 28 | ||
|
| ≤1 | 60 | 73 |
|
| >1 | 40 | 37 | ||
|
| left | 42 | 34 |
|
| right | 37 | 48 | ||
| isthmus | 1 | 2 | ||
| bilateral | 20 | 16 | ||
|
| upper | 14 | 28 |
|
| middle | 38 | 45 | ||
| lower | 48 | 18 | ||
|
| cystic | 0 | 0 |
|
| solid | 98 | 98 | ||
| solid with cystic | 2 | 2 | ||
|
| clear | 20 | 32 |
|
| unclear | 78 | 68 | ||
|
| smooth | 2 | 6 |
|
| semi-regular | 16 | 28 | ||
| irregular | 82 | 66 | ||
|
| No | 23 | 47 |
|
| Micro-calcification | 72 | 50 | ||
| Macro-calcification | 4 | 3 | ||
|
| Hypoechoic | 98 | 95 |
|
| isoechoic | 2 | 5 | ||
| Hyperechoic | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| No | 67 | 78 |
|
| invasion | 33 | 22 | ||
|
| avascularity | 28 | 41 |
|
| peripheral vascularity | 21 | 23 | ||
| limited vascularity | 46 | 34 | ||
| strip-like vascularity | 5 | 2 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| No | 43 | 50 |
|
| Yes | 57 | 50 | ||
|
| regular | 64 | 94 |
|
| irregular | 36 | 6 | ||
|
| thinning | 5 | 0 |
|
| normal | 55 | 78 | ||
| thickening | 40 | 22 | ||
|
| normal | 26 | 50 |
|
| unclear | 56 | 44 | ||
| disappear | 18 | 6 | ||
|
| No | 76 | 97 |
|
| Micro-calcification | 24 | 3 | ||
| Macro-calcification | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| No | 31 | 26 |
|
| limited | 66 | 73 | ||
| strip-like | 3 | 0 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| / | *2.79 ± 1.69 | 3.66 ± 7.17 |
|
|
| / | 4.85 ± 1.04 | 4.62 ± 0.70 |
|
|
| / | 17.11 ± 3.51 | 16.34 ± 2.92 |
|
|
| / | 1.73 ± 0.37 | 1.72 ± 0.38 |
|
|
| / | 101.17 ± 22.17 | 99.82 ± 24.66 |
|
|
| / | 656.95 ± 931.09 | 363.49 ± 440.51 |
|
|
| / | 137.70 ± 142.11 | 195.26 ± 195.13 |
|
|
| / | 19.55 ± 59.15 | 32.87 ± 86.98 |
|
|
| ||||
| Lobectomy+ CLND | 22 | 33 | / | |
| Total thyroidectomy + CLND | 78 | 67 | ||
|
| Classical-variate | 94 | 87 |
|
| Follicular-variate | 5 | 13 | ||
| Other | 1 | 0 | ||
|
| No | 88 | 97 |
|
| Yes | 12 | 3 | ||
|
| / | 9.28 ± 4.93 | 5.80 ± 4.70 |
|
PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; HT, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis; CLNM, central lymph node metastasis; L/R/I/B, left/right/isthmus/bilateral; U/M/L, upper/middle/low; TSH, thyrotropin; fT3, free triiodothyronine; fT4, free thyroxine; TT3, triiodothyronine; TT4, thyroxine; TgAb, anti-thyroglobulin antibody; TPOAb, anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody; TG, thyroglobulin; CLND, central lymph node dissection; CLN, central lymph node; LLNM, lateral lymph node metastasis.
*Mean ± SD.
Two-tail Fisher exact test.
Pearson’s Chi-squared test.
Student’s two-tail t-test.
Bold values indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Univariate logistic regression analysis of 214 PTC patients coexisted with HT for CLNM.
| Variables | Subgroup | Univariable | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard ratio |
| ||
|
| female | Reference |
|
| male | 5.06 (1.05–24.45) | ||
|
| <55 | Reference | 0.719 |
| ≥55 | 1.14 (0.55–2.36) | ||
|
| ≤1 | Reference | |
| >1 | 2.01 (1.10–3.66) |
| |
|
| No | Reference | 0.202 |
| Yes | 1.45 (0.81–2.60) | ||
|
| No | Reference | 0.117 |
| Yes | 0.94 (0.35–2.49) | ||
| N/A | 0.38 (0.11–1.35) | 0.683 | |
|
| ≤1 | Reference | |
| >1 | 1.12 (0.64–1.95) | ||
|
| left | Reference | 0.355 |
| right | 0.61 (0.33–1.12) | ||
| isthmus | 0.47 (0.04–5.45) | ||
| bilateral | 1 (0.46–2.15) | ||
|
| upper | Reference |
|
| middle | 1.67 (0.78–3.56) | ||
| lower | 3.57 (1.65–7.73) | ||
|
| clear | Reference | 0.060 |
| unclear | 1.82 (0.97–3.42) | ||
|
| smooth | Reference |
|
| semi-regular | 1.69 (0.31–9.11) | ||
| irregular | 3.68 (0.74–18.29) | ||
|
| No | Reference |
|
| Micro-calcification | 2.87 (1.57–5.23) | ||
| Macro-calcification | 2.34 (0.54–10.20) | ||
|
| Hypoechoic | Reference | 0.245 |
| isoechoic | 0.38 (0.07–1.93) | ||
|
| No | Reference | 0.095 |
| invasion | 1.67 (0.91–3.08) | ||
|
| avascularity | Reference | 0.109 |
| peripheral vascularity | 1.35 (0.64–2.84) | ||
| limited vascularity | 1.95 (1.03–3.70) | ||
| strip-like vascularity | 4.35 (0.79–23.98) | ||
|
| |||
|
| No | Reference | 0.297 |
| Yes | 1.33 (0.77–2.29) | ||
|
| regular | Reference |
|
| irregular | 8.65 (3.62–20.62) | ||
|
| thinning | Reference |
|
| normal | 0.12 (0.01–1.05) | ||
| thickening | 0.31 (0.34–2.83) | ||
|
| normal | Reference |
|
| unclear | 2.50 (1.36–4.57) | ||
| disappear | 5.96 (2.21–16.07) | ||
|
| No | Reference |
|
| micro-calcification | 9.08 (3.02–27.23) | ||
|
| avascularity | Reference | 0.369 |
| limited vascularity | 0.76 (0.42–1.39) | ||
| strip-like vascularity | 3.00 (0.295–30.49) | ||
|
| ≤0.35 | Reference | 0.816 |
| >0.35 and ≤5 | 1.31 (0.35–4.81) | ||
| >5 | 1.03 (0.22–4.76) | ||
|
| normal | Reference |
|
| >115 and ≤575 | 0.94 (0.50–1.76) | ||
| >575 and ≤1,150 | 0.74 (0.27–2.02) | ||
| >1,150 | 3.74 (1.39–10.04) | ||
|
| normal | Reference | 0.070 |
| >34 and ≤170 | 1.16 (0.58–2.29) | ||
| >170 and ≤340 | 0.97 (0.46–2.07) | ||
| >340 | 0.34 (0.13–0.86) | ||
|
| ≤2 | Reference |
|
| >2 and ≤20 | 1.25 (0.70–2.24) | ||
| >20 | 3.88 (1.49–10.13) | ||
PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; HT, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis; CLNM, central lymph node metastasis; L/R/I/B, left/right/isthmus/bilateral; U/M/L, upper/middle/low; TSH, thyrotropin; TgAb, anti-thyroglobulin antibody; TPOAb, anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody.
Bold values indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Multivariate analysis of 214 PTC patients coexisted with HT and CLNM.
| Variables | Subgroup | Multivariable | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard ratio |
| ||
|
| female | Reference | 0.106 |
| male | 4.90 (0.71–33.67) | ||
|
| ≤1 | Reference | |
| >1 | 1.65 (0.68–4.03) | 0.267 | |
|
| upper | Reference |
|
| middle | 2.17 (0.74–6.40) | ||
| lower | 6.85 (2.28–20.54) | ||
|
| smooth | Reference | 0.377 |
| semi-regular | 0.95 (0.12–7.09) | ||
| irregular | 1.78 (0.27–11.70) | ||
|
| No | Reference | 0.280 |
| Micro-calcification | 1.87 (0.85–4.10) | ||
| Macro-calcification | 1.09 (0.13–9.01) | ||
|
| |||
|
| regular | Reference |
|
| irregular | 6.47 (2.08–20.15) | ||
|
| thinning | Reference | 0.778 |
| normal | 0.64 (0.05–8.11) | ||
| thickening | 0.85 (0.06–11.27 | ||
|
| normal | Reference | 0.144 |
| unclear | 1.70 (0.74–3.88) | ||
| disappear | 3.90 (0.96–15.84) | ||
|
| No | Reference |
|
| Micro-calcification | 9.96 (2.344–42.34) | ||
|
| normal | Reference |
|
| >115 and ≤575 | 0.76 (0.31–1.85) | ||
| >575 and ≤1,150 | 0.60 (0.14–2.51) | ||
| >1,150 | 7.00 (1.56–31.28) | ||
|
| ≤2 | Reference | 0.441 |
| >2 and ≤20 | 0.85 (0.35–2.09) | ||
| >20 | 2.06 (0.47–8.90) | ||
PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; HT, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis; CLNM, central lymph node metastasis; U/M/L, upper/middle/low; TSH, thyrotropin; TgAb, anti-thyroglobulin antibody; TPOAb, anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody; TG, thyroglobulin.
Bold values indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Clinical factor-based nomogram used for preoperatively predicting the CLNM in PTC patients.
Figure 3The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and area under the ROC curve (AUC). (A) The ROC in the training cohort; (B). The ROC in the first validating cohort; (C). The ROC in the second validating cohort.
Figure 4The calibration curves for evaluating the accuracy of the nomogram and determination of decision points via Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). (A) The calibration curves in the training cohort; (B) The calibration curves in the first validation cohort derived from the 1,000 resampling bootstrap analysis; (C) The calibration curves in the second validation cohort derived from the 1,000 resampling bootstrap analysis; (D) The DCA in training cohort; (E) The DCA in the first validation cohort; (F) The DCA in the second validation cohort.