| Literature DB >> 34366692 |
Krunal K Punjani1, Kala Mahadevan1.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted existing educational systems worldwide. Due to lockdowns in several countries, the educational institutions have been directed by governments to move towards online learning. The challenge for educational institutions and faculty members is to assess the influence of various factors that would enable adoption of online learning by students in higher education. This study investigates the influence of awareness of COVID-19 (AOC19), computer & internet self-efficacy (CISE), and online communication self-efficacy (OCSE) on perceived net benefits (NB) of the students and their intention towards the online learning (INT). The study further analyzes the mediating role of students' attitude towards online learning (ATOL). Data of 1023 students of higher education across multiple universities in India were collected and analyzed using structural equation modelling through AMOS 24 and mediation analysis through 'PROCESS' macro for SPSS. The findings revealed that, AOC19 positively influenced students' NB and INT; CISE had a significant inverse relationship with NB, and partially significant positive relationship with INT; OCSE was observed to be a significant predictor of NB with positive direct relationship; ATOL had a significant full mediation among CISE and NB, and acted as significant partial mediator between CISE and INT, AOC19 and NB, AO19 and INT, OCSE and NB, and OCSE and INT. This paper would be useful for the faculty members, institutions and education technology companies in the higher education domain by enabling an understanding of the attitude, perception and intention of the students towards online learning during the COVID-19 scenario.Entities:
Keywords: Attitude; COVID-19; Higher Education; Intention; Online Learning; Perceived net benefits
Year: 2021 PMID: 34366692 PMCID: PMC8327905 DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10665-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Educ Inf Technol (Dordr) ISSN: 1360-2357
Fig. 1Proposed Conceptual Model. Legend: AOC19: Awareness of COVID-19, CISE: Computer/ Internet Self Efficacy, OCSE: Online Communication Self Efficacy, ATOL: Attitude towards Online Learning, NB: Perceived Net Benefits, INT: Intention towards online learning
Items used in Survey Questionnaire
| Constructs | Adapted form | Measurement Items |
|---|---|---|
| Awareness of COVID-19 | Al-Hattami, | 1. Moving to online learning format is a positive protective decision to avoid COVID-19 infection 2. Using the online learning format is a good decision to continue education during COVID-19 situation 3. Online learning during the COVID-19 situation brings more advantages than disadvantages 4. Online learning is a convenient way to continue education and avoid the spread of COVID-19 |
| Computer & Internet Self Efficacy | Hung et al., | 1. I feel confident in performing the basic computer functions required for online learning 2. I feel confident in my knowledge and skills of how to manage software for online learning 3. I feel confident in using the Internet to find or gather information for online learning |
| Online Communication Self Efficacy | Hung et al., | 1. I feel confident in using online tools to effectively communicate with others during the online learning sessions 2. I feel confident in expressing myself through text/ chat-box during online learning session 3. I feel confident in posting/ asking questions during online learning sessions |
| Attitude towards E- Learning | Shaft et al., | Online learning enhances my creativity during COVID-19 situation. Online learning is helpful for me during COVID-19 situation. Online learning is enjoyable. Online learning increases my productivity during COVID-19. |
| Perceived Net Benefits | Salam & Farooq, | 1. Online learning involves all students actively during COVID-19 2. My academic performance is enhanced by using Online Learning during COVID-19 3. Use of Online Learning promotes critical thinking skills and collaborative knowledge building during COVID-19 situation 4. Online Learning has enhanced my interaction with my peers and my teachers during COVID-19 situation 5. I can monitor my individual progress (i.e. personal growth) using Online Learning during COVID-19 |
| Intention towards online learning | Ji et al | 1. I intend to use online learning during COVID-19 situation 2. I plan to use online learning during COVID-19 situation 3. I intend to recommend online learning to others during COVID-19 situation |
Demographic Profile of Respondents
| Categories | Frequency | % |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| - Male | 283 | 27.66 |
| - Female | 740 | 72.34 |
| Age Group | ||
| - 16–20 years | 533 | 52.1 |
| - 21–25 years | 425 | 41.54 |
| - 26–30 years | 37 | 3.62 |
| - 31–35 years | 28 | 2.74 |
| Educational Course | ||
| - Junior college | 24 | 2.35 |
| - Graduation | 486 | 47.51 |
| - Post-Graduation | 298 | 29.13 |
| - Other | 215 | 21.02 |
KMO and Bartlett’s Test
| Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy | 0.957 | |
| Bartlett's Test of Sphericity | Approx. Chi-Square | 12,529.381 |
| df | 231 | |
| Sig | 0.000 | |
Construct Reliability and Validity
| Construct | Measurement Items | Factor Loadings | Cronbach’s α | AVE | CR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awareness of COVID-19 | Moving to online learning format is a positive protective decision to avoid COVID-19 infection | 0.65 | 0.771 | 0.4567 | 0.7694 |
| Using the online learning format is a good decision to continue education during COVID-19 situation | 0.734 | ||||
| Online learning during the COVID-19 situation brings more advantages than disadvantages | 0.588 | ||||
| Online learning is a convenient way to continue education and avoid the spread of COVID-19 | 0.721 | ||||
| Computer & Internet Self Efficacy | I feel confident in performing the basic computer functions required for online learning | 0.705 | 0.794 | 0.5390 | 0.7776 |
| I feel confident in my knowledge and skills of how to manage software for online learning | 0.703 | ||||
| I feel confident in using the Internet to find or gather information for online learning | 0.791 | ||||
| Online Communication Self Efficacy | I feel confident in using online tools to effectively communicate with others during the online learning sessions | 0.767 | 0.788 | 0.5085 | 0.7557 |
| I feel confident in expressing myself through text/ chat-box during online learning session | 0.688 | ||||
| I feel confident in posting/ asking questions during online learning sessions | 0.681 | ||||
| Attitude towards Online Learning | Online learning enhances my creativity during COVID-19 situation | 0765 | 0.837 | 0.6090 | 0.8616 |
| Online learning is helpful for me during COVID-19 situation | 0.791 | ||||
| Online learning is enjoyable | 0.751 | ||||
| Online learning increases my productivity during COVID-19 | 0.813 | ||||
| Perceived Net Benefits | Online learning involves all students actively during COVID-19 | 0.734 | 0.877 | 0.5906 | 0.8099 |
| My academic performance is enhanced by using Online learning during COVID-19 | 0.827 | ||||
| Use of Online learning promotes critical success skills and collaborative knowledge building during COVID-19 situation | 0.805 | ||||
| Online learning has enhanced my interaction with my peers and my teachers during COVID-19 situation | 0.747 | ||||
| I can monitor my individual progress (i.e., personal growth) using Online learning during COVID-19 | 0.724 | ||||
| Intention towards online learning | I intend to use online learning during COVID-19 situation | 0.83 | 0.865 | 0.6828 | 0.8659 |
| I intend to use online learning to enhance my knowledge during COVID-19 situation | 0.823 | ||||
| I intend to recommend online learning to my friends during COVID-19 situation | 0.826 |
Fig. 2Confirmatory Factor Analysis—Measurement Model. Legend: AOC19: Awareness of COVID-19, CISE: Computer & Internet Self Efficacy, OCSE: Online Communication Self Efficacy, ATOL: Attitude towards Online Learning, NB: Perceived Net Benefits, INT: Intention towards online learning
Fit Indices for Confirmatory Factor Analysis
| Fit Indices | Recommended Value | Observed Value | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMIN/df (minimum discrepancy as indexed chi-square) | Between 1 and 3, ‘p’ less than 0.05 | 2.907, p = 0.001 | Good fit |
| GFI (goodness of fit index) | More than 0.9 | 0.952 | Good fit |
| CFI (comparative fit index) | More than 0.95 | 0.972 | Good fit |
| NFI (Normed-Fit Index) | More than 0.95 (Good Fit) | 0.958 | Good fit |
| TLI (Tucker Lewis index) | More than 0.95 | 0.964 | Good fit |
| PNFI (parsimonious normal fit) | More than 0.6 | 0.755 | Good fit |
| RMSEA (root mean square error of approximation) | Less than 0.08 | 0.043 | Good fit |
| SRMR (Standardized) Root Mean Square Residual) | Less than 0.08 | 0.0386 | Good fit |
Fig. 3Structural Equation Model. Legend: AOC19: Awareness of COVID-19, CISE: Computer & Internet Self Efficacy, OCSE: Online Communication Self Efficacy, ATOL: Attitude towards Online Learning, NB: Perceived Net Benefits, INT: Intention towards online learning
Hypothesis Results – Construct Relationship
| Hypothesis Number | Construct Relationship | Standardized Regression Weight | Significance | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | AOC19 → NB | 0.177 | 0.004 | Significant |
| H2 | AOC19 → INT | 0.193 | *** | Significant |
| H3 | CISE → NB | -0.396 | *** | Significant |
| H4 | CISE → INT | 0.149 | 0.061 | Partially Significant |
| H5 | OCSE → NB | 0.369 | *** | Significant |
| H6 | OCSE → INT | -0.033 | 0.697 | Non-Significant |
Results of Simple Mediation
| Estimate | SE | t value | Estimate | SE | t value | Estimate | SE | Bias corrected bootstrap confidence intervals (95%) | ||
| LLCI | ULCI | |||||||||
| 0.5827** | 0.0285 | 20.4519 | 0.158** | 0.0267 | 5.9058 | 0.3929 | 0.0244 | 0.3445 | 0.4403 | Partial Mediation |
| Estimate | SE | t value | Estimate | SE | t value | Estimate | SE | Bias corrected bootstrap confidence intervals (95%) | ||
| LLCI | ULCI | |||||||||
| 0.3436** | 0.0315 | 10.9061 | -0.0001 | 0.024 | -0.005 | 0.3231 | 0.0291 | 0.2663 | 0.3796 | Full Mediation |
| Estimate | SE | t value | Estimate | SE | t value | Estimate | SE | Bias corrected bootstrap confidence intervals (95%) | ||
| LLCI | ULCI | |||||||||
| 0.5407** | 0.0269 | 20.1287 | 0.1629** | 0.0244 | 6.6705 | 0.3724 | 0.0232 | 0.3278 | 0.4181 | Partial Mediation |
| Estimate | SE | t value | Estimate | SE | t value | Estimate | SE | Bias corrected bootstrap confidence intervals (95%) | ||
| LLCI | ULCI | |||||||||
| 0.6596** | 0.0268 | 24.6079 | 0.2986** | 0.0268 | 11.1472 | 0.3339 | 0.0216 | 0.2903 | 0.3765 | Partial Mediation |
| Estimate | SE | t value | Estimate | SE | t value | Estimate | SE | Bias corrected bootstrap confidence intervals (95%) | ||
| LLCI | ULCI | |||||||||
| 0.5055** | 0.0293 | 17.255 | 0.2115** | 0.0242 | 8.7559 | 0.2763 | 0.0238 | 0.2288 | 0.3238 | Partial Mediation |
| Estimate | SE | t value | Estimate | SE | t value | Estimate | SE | Bias corrected bootstrap confidence intervals (95%) | ||
| LLCI | ULCI | |||||||||
| 0.5720** | 0.0262 | 21.8093 | 0.2287** | 0.025 | 9.139 | 0.3384 | 0.0227 | 0.2928 | 0.3826 | Partial Mediation |
Legend: SE = Standard Error, LLCI = Lower limit confidence interval, ULCI = Upper limit confidence interval, **p < 0.001.