Ingrid Daae Rasmussen1,2, Nya Mehnwolo Boayue1, Matthias Mittner1, Martin Bystad1,2, Ole K Grønli2, Torgil Riise Vangberg3,4, Gábor Csifcsák1, Per M Aslaksen1,5. 1. Department of Psychology, Research Group for Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. 2. Department of Geropsychiatry, University Hospital of North Norway, Norway. 3. Department of Clinical Medicine, University hospital of North Norway, Norway. 4. PET Center, University hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway. 5. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The optimal stimulation parameters when using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to improve memory performance in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) are lacking. In healthy individuals, inter-individual differences in brain anatomy significantly influence current distribution during tDCS, an effect that might be aggravated by variations in cortical atrophy in AD patients. OBJECTIVE: To measure the effect of individualized HD-tDCS in AD patients. METHODS: Nineteen AD patients were randomly assigned to receive active or sham high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS). Computational modeling of the HD-tDCS-induced electric field in each patient's brain was analyzed based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The chosen montage provided the highest net anodal electric field in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). An accelerated HD-tDCS design was conducted (2 mA for 3×20 min) on two separate days. Pre- and post-intervention cognitive tests and T1 and T2-weighted MRI and diffusion tensor imaging data at baseline were analyzed. RESULTS: Different montages were optimal for individual patients. The active HD-tDCS group improved significantly in delayed memory and MMSE performance compared to the sham group. Five participants in the active group had higher scores on delayed memory post HD-tDCS, four remained stable and one declined. The active HD-tDCS group had a significant positive correlation between fractional anisotropy in the anterior thalamic radiation and delayed memory score. CONCLUSION: HD-tDCS significantly improved delayed memory in AD. Our study can be regarded as a proof-of-concept attempt to increase tDCS efficacy. The present findings should be confirmed in larger samples.
BACKGROUND: The optimal stimulation parameters when using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to improve memory performance in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) are lacking. In healthy individuals, inter-individual differences in brain anatomy significantly influence current distribution during tDCS, an effect that might be aggravated by variations in cortical atrophy in AD patients. OBJECTIVE: To measure the effect of individualized HD-tDCS in AD patients. METHODS: Nineteen AD patients were randomly assigned to receive active or sham high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS). Computational modeling of the HD-tDCS-induced electric field in each patient's brain was analyzed based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The chosen montage provided the highest net anodal electric field in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). An accelerated HD-tDCS design was conducted (2 mA for 3×20 min) on two separate days. Pre- and post-intervention cognitive tests and T1 and T2-weighted MRI and diffusion tensor imaging data at baseline were analyzed. RESULTS: Different montages were optimal for individual patients. The active HD-tDCS group improved significantly in delayed memory and MMSE performance compared to the sham group. Five participants in the active group had higher scores on delayed memory post HD-tDCS, four remained stable and one declined. The active HD-tDCS group had a significant positive correlation between fractional anisotropy in the anterior thalamic radiation and delayed memory score. CONCLUSION: HD-tDCS significantly improved delayed memory in AD. Our study can be regarded as a proof-of-concept attempt to increase tDCS efficacy. The present findings should be confirmed in larger samples.
Entities:
Keywords:
Alzheimer’s disease; NIBS; computational modeling; noninvasive brain stimulation; tDCS; transcranial direct current stimulation