Asma Khan1, Elfriede Pahl1, Devin A Koehl2, Ryan S Cantor2, James K Kirklin2, Paolo Rusconi3, Aliessa P Barnes4, Estela Azeka5, Melanie D Everitt6. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago. 2. Kirklin Institute for Research in Surgical Outcomes, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 3. Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri. 5. Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil. 6. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado. Electronic address: Melanie.everitt@childrenscolorado.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Challenges exist with heterotaxy due to the complexity of heart disease, abnormal venous connections, and infection risks. This study aims to understand heart transplant outcomes for children with heterotaxy. METHODS: All children with congenital heart disease listed for transplant from 1993 to 2018 were included. Those with and without heterotaxy were compared. Waitlist outcomes and survival post-listing and transplant were analyzed. Post-transplant risk factors were identified using multiphase parametric hazard modeling. RESULTS: There were 4814 children listed, of whom 196 (4%) had heterotaxy. Heterotaxy candidates were older (5.8 ± 5.7 vs 4.2 ± 5.5 years, p < 0.01), listed at a lower urgency status (29.8% vs 18.4%, p < 0.01), more commonly single ventricle physiology (71.3% vs 59.2%, p < 0.01), and less often supported by mechanical ventilation (22% vs 29.1%, p < 0.05) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (3.6% vs 7.5%, p < 0.05). There were no differences in waitlist outcomes of transplant, death, or removal. Overall, post-transplant survival was worse for children with heterotaxy: one-year survival 77.2% vs 85.1%, with and without heterotaxy, respectively. Heterotaxy was an independent predictor for early mortality in the earliest era (1993-2004), HR 2.09, CI 1.16-3.75, p = 0.014. When stratified by era, survival improved with time. Heterotaxy patients had a lower freedom from infection and from severe rejection, but no difference in vasculopathy or malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality risk associated with heterotaxy is mitigated in the recent transplant era. Early referral may improve waitlist outcomes for heterotaxy patients who otherwise have a lower status at listing. Lower freedom from both infection and severe rejection after transplant in heterotaxy highlights the challenges of balancing immune suppression.
BACKGROUND: Challenges exist with heterotaxy due to the complexity of heart disease, abnormal venous connections, and infection risks. This study aims to understand heart transplant outcomes for children with heterotaxy. METHODS: All children with congenital heart disease listed for transplant from 1993 to 2018 were included. Those with and without heterotaxy were compared. Waitlist outcomes and survival post-listing and transplant were analyzed. Post-transplant risk factors were identified using multiphase parametric hazard modeling. RESULTS: There were 4814 children listed, of whom 196 (4%) had heterotaxy. Heterotaxy candidates were older (5.8 ± 5.7 vs 4.2 ± 5.5 years, p < 0.01), listed at a lower urgency status (29.8% vs 18.4%, p < 0.01), more commonly single ventricle physiology (71.3% vs 59.2%, p < 0.01), and less often supported by mechanical ventilation (22% vs 29.1%, p < 0.05) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (3.6% vs 7.5%, p < 0.05). There were no differences in waitlist outcomes of transplant, death, or removal. Overall, post-transplant survival was worse for children with heterotaxy: one-year survival 77.2% vs 85.1%, with and without heterotaxy, respectively. Heterotaxy was an independent predictor for early mortality in the earliest era (1993-2004), HR 2.09, CI 1.16-3.75, p = 0.014. When stratified by era, survival improved with time. Heterotaxy patients had a lower freedom from infection and from severe rejection, but no difference in vasculopathy or malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality risk associated with heterotaxy is mitigated in the recent transplant era. Early referral may improve waitlist outcomes for heterotaxy patients who otherwise have a lower status at listing. Lower freedom from both infection and severe rejection after transplant in heterotaxy highlights the challenges of balancing immune suppression.
Authors: Thomas G Saba; Gabrielle C Geddes; Stephanie M Ware; David N Schidlow; Pedro J Del Nido; Nathan S Rubalcava; Samir K Gadepalli; Terri Stillwell; Anne Griffiths; Laura M Bennett Murphy; Andrew T Barber; Margaret W Leigh; Necia Sabin; Adam J Shapiro Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2022-09-09 Impact factor: 4.303