| Literature DB >> 34365790 |
Lei Jiang1, Miguel Tinoco2, Susana Fernández-García2, Yujiao Sun1, Mariia Traviankina1, Pengli Nan1, Qi Xue1, Huiyan Pan2,3, Almudena Aguinaco4,5, Juan M González-Leal4,5, Ginesa Blanco2,5, Eduardo Blanco4,5, Ana B Hungría2,5, Jose J Calvino2,5, Xiaowei Chen2,5.
Abstract
In this work, a simple one-step thermal oxidation process was established to achieve a significant surface increase in {110} and {111} nanofacets on well-defined, pure and Pr-doped, ceria nanocubes. More importantly, without changing most of the bulk properties, this treatment leads to a remarkable boost of their enzymatic activities: from the oxidant (oxidase-like) to antioxidant (hydroxyl radical scavenging) as well as the paraoxon degradation (phosphatase-like) activities. Such performance improvement might be due to the thermally generated sawtoothlike {111} nanofacets and defects, which facilitate the oxygen mobility and the formation of oxygen vacancies on the surface. Finally, possible mechanisms of nanoceria as artificial enzymes have been proposed in this manuscript. Considering the potential application of ceria as artificial enzymes, this thermal treatment may enable the future design of highly efficient nanozymes without changing the bulk composition.Entities:
Keywords: Pr-doping; artificial enzyme; ceria; nanocubes; nanofacets; oxidation treatment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34365790 PMCID: PMC8674880 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c09992
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces ISSN: 1944-8244 Impact factor: 9.229
Figure 1HRTEM images of (a) CeO2NC and (c) CeO2NC-O600, STEM-HAADF images of (b) 10% Pr-CeO2NC and (d) 10% Pr-CeO2NC-O600 samples. The inset table shows the percentage of the {100}, {110}, and {111} facets located at the surfaces, edges, and vertexes of the nanocubes, respectively, measured by TEM and STEM-HAADF techniques.
Figure 2STEM-HAADF images and XEDS element maps of Ce, Pr and Ce–Pr of (a–d) 10% Pr-CeO2NC and (e–h) 10% Pr-CeO2NC-O600.
Physicochemical Properties of the Samples
| composition
by ICP (mol %) | composition
by XPS (mol %) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sample | BET surface areas (m2 g–1) | calculated
surface area (m2 g–1) | Ce | Pr | Ce | Pr | Ce3+ in
total amount of Ce (%) | average particle size (nm) | τ Scherrer (nm) | lattice parameter (Å) |
| CeO2NC | 38 | 33 | 9 | 22 | 21 | 5.4 | ||||
| CeO2NC-O600 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 31 | 37 | 5.4 | ||||
| 10% Pr-CeO2NC | 25 | 23 | 90.3 | 9.7 | 90.6 | 9.4 | 2 | 27 | 29 | 5.4 |
| 10% Pr-CeO2NC-O600 | 20 | 18 | 89.2 | 10.8 | 0 | 37 | 41 | 5.4 | ||
Calculated from the particle size distribution, including around 100 nanoparticles, obtained by TEM.
Calculated using XPS data.
Calculated using XRD data.
Figure 3UV–vis absorption spectra of the ceria nanocube samples.
Indirect and Direct Band Gaps of All the Samples and Raman ID/IF2g Ratios of Pr-Doped Ceria Nanocubes
| catalysts | indirect | direct | Raman |
|---|---|---|---|
| CeO2NC | 3.17 ± 0.05 | 3.50 ± 0.05 | |
| CeO2NC-O600 | 3.19 ± 0.06 | 3.49 ± 0.05 | |
| 10% Pr-CeO2NC | 2.95 ± 0.03 | 3.53 ± 0.04 | 0.25 |
| 10% Pr-CeO2NC-O600 | 2.86 ± 0.06 | 3.51 ± 0.05 | 0.38 |
Figure 4Raman spectra of the ceria nanocube samples.
Figure 5TPR profiles of the different ceria nanocube samples. The m/z = 18 signal in H2-TPR corresponds to H2O evolution.
Figure 6Activities of CeO2NC, CeO2NC-O600, 5% Pr-CeO2NC, 5% Pr-CeO2NC-O600, 10% Pr-CeO2NC, 10% Pr-CeO2NC-O600, 15% Pr-CeO2NC, and 15% Pr-CeO2NC-O600 as enzyme-mimics of oxidase, hydroxyl radical scavenger, and phosphatase. (a) UV–vis spectra of TMB (0.009 M) after mixing with ceria (0.1 mg mL–1) samples in pH 4.0 buffer. Inset photos show the color change when TMB is oxidized. (b) Comparison of the performance of the eight ceria samples in TMB oxidation; (c) UV–vis spectra of MV (2.4 × 10–5 M) after mixing with Fenton reagent (FeSO4 and H2O2), with and without the presence of different ceria (1.7 μg mL–1) samples. Inset photos show the color recovery as the Fenton-generated hydroxyl radicals are removed. (d) Comparison of the performance of the eight ceria samples in eliminating hydroxyl radicals; (e) UV–vis spectra of paraoxon (0.05 M) in the presence of 5 mg mL–1 (29 mM) ceria samples. The absorbance peak at 401 nm is from the hydrolysis product p-nitrophenol. (f) Comparison of the performance of the eight ceria samples in hydrolyzing paraoxon, catalytic reaction shown in the inset.
Figure 7(a) Energy level diagram and excitation processes of pure and Pr-doped CeO2 nanocubes; (b) absorbance spectra of CeO2NC and 10% Pr-CeO2NC samples with and without 600 °C oxidation treatment.
Figure 8Schematic illustration of how the {110} and {111} nanofacets are generated on {100}-dominant CeO2NC surfaces via an oxidation treatment at 600 °C, which consequently enhance their biomimetic enzyme activities.