Literature DB >> 34364955

Do Biological Constraints Impair Dendritic Computation?

Ilenna Simone Jones1, Konrad Paul Kording2.   

Abstract

Computations on the dendritic trees of neurons have important constraints. Voltage dependent conductances in dendrites are not similar to arbitrary direct-current generation, they are the basis for dendritic nonlinearities and they do not allow converting positive currents into negative currents. While it has been speculated that the dendritic tree of a neuron can be seen as a multi-layer neural network and it has been shown that such an architecture could be computationally strong, we do not know if that computational strength is preserved under these biological constraints. Here we simulate models of dendritic computation with and without these constraints. We find that dendritic model performance on interesting machine learning tasks is not hurt by these constraints but may benefit from them. Our results suggest that single real dendritic trees may be able to learn a surprisingly broad range of tasks.
Copyright © 2022 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dendritic computation; ion channels; machine learning; modeling; nonlinearity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34364955      PMCID: PMC8835230          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.07.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.708


  30 in total

1.  Arithmetic of subthreshold synaptic summation in a model CA1 pyramidal cell.

Authors:  Panayiota Poirazi; Terrence Brannon; Bartlett W Mel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Pyramidal neuron as two-layer neural network.

Authors:  Panayiota Poirazi; Terrence Brannon; Bartlett W Mel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Efficient estimation of detailed single-neuron models.

Authors:  Quentin J M Huys; Misha B Ahrens; Liam Paninski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. 1943.

Authors:  W S McCulloch; W Pitts
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 5.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Activity-dependent dendritic spine neck changes are correlated with synaptic strength.

Authors:  Roberto Araya; Tim P Vogels; Rafael Yuste
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  How does the brain solve visual object recognition?

Authors:  James J DiCarlo; Davide Zoccolan; Nicole C Rust
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Predictive Coding Approximates Backprop Along Arbitrary Computation Graphs.

Authors:  Beren Millidge; Alexander Tschantz; Christopher L Buckley
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.278

9.  Model of gamma frequency burst discharge generated by conditional backpropagation.

Authors:  B Doiron; A Longtin; R W Turner; L Maler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Models of neocortical layer 5b pyramidal cells capturing a wide range of dendritic and perisomatic active properties.

Authors:  Etay Hay; Sean Hill; Felix Schürmann; Henry Markram; Idan Segev
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  1 in total

1.  A synaptic learning rule for exploiting nonlinear dendritic computation.

Authors:  Brendan A Bicknell; Michael Häusser
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 17.173

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.