Literature DB >> 34363750

Autophagy modulates endothelial junctions to restrain neutrophil diapedesis during inflammation.

Natalia Reglero-Real1, Lorena Pérez-Gutiérrez2, Azumi Yoshimura3, Loïc Rolas2, José Garrido-Mesa4, Anna Barkaway2, Catherine Pickworth2, Rebeca S Saleeb2, Maria Gonzalez-Nuñez4, Shani N Austin-Williams4, Dianne Cooper5, Laura Vázquez-Martínez2, Tao Fu6, Giulia De Rossi7, Matthew Golding2, Mathieu-Benoit Voisin2, Chantal M Boulanger8, Yoshiaki Kubota9, William A Muller6, Sharon A Tooze10, Thomas D Nightingale2, Lucy Collinson3, Mauro Perretti5, Ezra Aksoy4, Sussan Nourshargh11.   

Abstract

The migration of neutrophils from the blood circulation to sites of infection or injury is a key immune response and requires the breaching of endothelial cells (ECs) that line the inner aspect of blood vessels. Unregulated neutrophil transendothelial cell migration (TEM) is pathogenic, but the molecular basis of its physiological termination remains unknown. Here, we demonstrated that ECs of venules in inflamed tissues exhibited a robust autophagic response that was aligned temporally with the peak of neutrophil trafficking and was strictly localized to EC contacts. Genetic ablation of EC autophagy led to excessive neutrophil TEM and uncontrolled leukocyte migration in murine inflammatory models, while pharmacological induction of autophagy suppressed neutrophil infiltration into tissues. Mechanistically, autophagy regulated the remodeling of EC junctions and expression of key EC adhesion molecules, facilitating their intracellular trafficking and degradation. Collectively, we have identified autophagy as a modulator of EC leukocyte trafficking machinery aimed at terminating physiological inflammation.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATG16L1; ATG5; PECAM-1; autophagy; diapedesis; endothelium; extravasation; inflammation; junctions; neutrophils

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34363750      PMCID: PMC8459396          DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunity        ISSN: 1074-7613            Impact factor:   31.745


Introduction

The recruitment of neutrophils from the blood circulation to sites of injury and infection is a critical component of host defense and hence physiological inflammation. This innate immune reaction must be tightly regulated to avoid excessive tissue damage and the instigation of inflammatory diseases. To exit the vascular compartment, neutrophils are required to breach the endothelial cell (EC) monolayer that lines the lumen of all blood vessels (Nourshargh et al., 2010). Neutrophil migration through the endothelium is exquisitely regulated by the reorganization of junctionally expressed adhesion molecules such as platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1), members of the junctional adhesion molecule (JAM) family, and VE-cadherin (Nourshargh and Alon, 2014; Reglero-Real et al., 2016; Vestweber, 2015), and is driven by locally generated and presented chemokines (Ley et al., 2007; Nourshargh and Alon, 2014; Girbl et al., 2018). Leukocyte transendothelial migration (TEM) commonly occurs via the movement of leukocytes across junctions between adjacent ECs (paracellular TEM), although migration through the body of the endothelium (transcellular TEM) also occurs in vitro and in vivo (Ley et al., 2007; Muller, 2011; Woodfin et al., 2011). In contrast to our in-depth knowledge of neutrophil TEM onset and progression, the molecular basis of neutrophil TEM cessation remains unclear. Macroautophagy (hereafter called canonical autophagy) is an evolutionary conserved process that enables the delivery of cytoplasmic content to the lysosome for degradation. In recent years, canonical autophagy has emerged as a central regulator of innate immune functions, including cytokine production, differentiation of immune cells, and pathogen clearance (Deretic and Levine, 2018; Yu et al., 2018; Deretic, 2021). Moreover, genome-wide studies have identified human autophagy-related (Atg) gene polymorphisms as markers of predisposition for multiple inflammatory disorders such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), neutrophilic airway inflammation, and Crohn’s disease (Bentham et al., 2015; Levine and Kroemer, 2019; Pham et al., 2016). While there is ample evidence of immune cell autophagy-related genes regulating inflammation, less is known about the role of EC autophagy in this context. However, autophagy is a homeostatic regulator of a number of EC functions, most notably EC survival and developmental angiogenesis, and is a key modulator of numerous vascular disorders (Nussenzweig et al., 2015; Vion et al., 2017; Sprott et al., 2019; Santovito et al., 2020). Mechanistically, the role of autophagy in these processes is linked to the exquisite capacity of the EC to sense local changes in physical and hemodynamic forces and cellular and molecular composition. Cellular stresses, including hypoxia, infection, and trauma, instigate causes of biological fluctuations in the EC milieu (Nourshargh and Alon, 2014), and activation of autophagy forms a key mechanism through which ECs respond to local perturbations (Verhoeven et al., 2021). Despite the above, little is known regarding EC autophagy in relation to immune cell trafficking, most notably within the microcirculatory system. To address this fundamental issue, here, using high-resolution confocal microscopy, we investigated the role of EC autophagy in the neutrophil breaching of venular walls. We found that in acutely inflamed cremaster muscles, postcapillary venular ECs exhibited a profound autophagic response. This event was exclusively localized to EC borders and was aligned with the peak of neutrophil trafficking. Confocal intravital microscopy (IVM) revealed exaggerated and faster neutrophil TEM across autophagy-deficient ECs, while the pharmacological induction of autophagy inhibited neutrophil migration. Mechanistically, autophagic machinery regulated the expression of key EC adhesion molecules and modeling of EC contacts via the reorganization and degradation of junctional molecules. The WD40 domain of the autophagy-related protein ATG16L1, essential for non-canonical autophagy, played a role during this process. These findings reveal the ability of autophagy components to function in a non-canonical manner in inflamed ECs. Since the lack of EC autophagy led to excessive neutrophil infiltration in multiple inflammatory models, our results identify EC autophagy as an essential cellular process to limit physiological neutrophil trafficking.

Results

Acutely inflamed microvascular venules exhibit induction of autophagy within EC junctions

Canonical autophagy involves the formation of dedicated double-membrane vesicles, commonly known as autophagosomes, that sequester autophagic cargos destined for cellular degradation and recycling processes (Ktistakis and Tooze, 2016). These organelles can be identified by their recruitment of the membrane-bound, phosphatidylethanolamine conjugated form of microtubule-associated protein light chain 3B (LC3) and are apparent as characteristic LC3+ puncta (Klionsky et al., 2016). To investigate the potential role of autophagy in relation to the temporal profile of neutrophil trafficking in vivo, we established a confocal microscopy method to observe and quantify the formation of LC3 puncta in cremasteric postcapillary venules (PCVs) (delineated with a non-function blocking anti-PECAM-1 monoclonal antibody [mAb]) using GFP-LC3 transgenic mice (GFP-Map1lc3a) (Mizushima et al., 2004). Initial experiments detected increased numbers of GFP-LC3 puncta in venular ECs in response to nutrient starvation (Figures S1A–S1C), a potent stimulator of canonical autophagy. Local administration of the class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor 3-methyladenine (3MA), an established blocker of starvation-induced autophagosome formation (Klionsky et al., 2016), significantly reduced the percentage of total ECs exhibiting GFP-LC3 puncta (Figure S1B) and the number of these organelles in ECs (Figure S1C). Next, we explored the prevalence of this reaction during the course of an acute inflammatory model of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IR; 40 min ischemia followed by reperfusion for up to 8 h). This reaction is characterized by a profound but transient infiltration of neutrophils during the reperfusion phase that peaks at 4 h and declines toward basal by 8 h post reperfusion (Figure 1A). In tissues subjected to IR (4 h reperfusion), transmigrated neutrophils exhibited GFP-LC3 puncta (Figures S1D and S1E), consistent with previous reports of a cell-autonomous role for autophagy in neutrophil functions (Bhattacharya et al., 2015; Riffelmacher et al., 2017). Following IR, arterial ECs showed no change in GFP-LC3 puncta numbers (Figure S1F), but venular ECs exhibited a robust increase in autophagic response (Figures 1B–1E, S1D, and S1E). Unlike the more diffuse distribution of puncta following starvation (Figures S1A and S1G), in IR-stimulated venules, this increase was entirely accounted for by the presence of GFP-LC3 puncta at PECAM-1+ EC contacts (Figures 1B and 1C). The quantification of endogenous LC3 puncta by immunofluorescence (IF) staining showed comparable results (Figure 1D), illustrating similar activities between GFP-LC3 and the wild-type (WT) protein in ECs. In investigating the time course of autophagy induction, GFP-LC3 puncta formation was only significant at the peak of the neutrophil emigration response, and declined toward control amounts during the cessation phase of neutrophil infiltration (Figure 1E). Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated tissues (4 h), a reaction similarly characterized by neutrophil infiltration (Figure 1F), exhibited comparable EC junctional localization of GFP-LC3 puncta (Figures 1G and 1H). Overall, upon neutrophilic inflammatory reactions, ECs showed increased LC3 puncta at cell-cell contacts, suggesting that autophagic processes may play a role in regulating EC junctions, and hence immune cell infiltration into tissues.
Figure 1

Acutely inflamed microvascular ECs exhibit induction of autophagy within vascular junctions

(A–E) GFP-Map1lc3a or WT mice were subjected to local IR injury

(A) Neutrophil extravasation at the indicated times post reperfusion, (n = 3–6 mice/group).

(B–E) Representative confocal images (n = 6) of postcapillary venules (PCVs, PECAM-1), with arrows indicating EC junctional localization of GFP-LC3 puncta (scale bar, 5 μm) (B) and quantification of (C) GFP-LC3 puncta or (D) endogenous LC3 puncta per venular EC area at 4 h and (E) at the indicated times postreperfusion (n = 3–6 mice/group).

(F–H) GFP-Map1lc3 mice were treated intrascrotally (i.s.) with PBS or LPS.

(F and G) Neutrophil extravasation (n = 3 mice/group) (F) and (G) representative (n = 3) confocal images of cremasteric PCVs (PECAM-1), with arrows indicating EC junctional localization of GFP-LC3 puncta (scale bar, 5 μm).

(H) Quantification of GFP-LC3 puncta per venular EC area (n = 3 mice/group). Dashed boxes delineate magnified areas.

Means ± SEMs. Statistically significant difference from controls or between indicated groups is shown by ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ns, not significant.

See also Figure S1.

Acutely inflamed microvascular ECs exhibit induction of autophagy within vascular junctions (A–E) GFP-Map1lc3a or WT mice were subjected to local IR injury (A) Neutrophil extravasation at the indicated times post reperfusion, (n = 3–6 mice/group). (B–E) Representative confocal images (n = 6) of postcapillary venules (PCVs, PECAM-1), with arrows indicating EC junctional localization of GFP-LC3 puncta (scale bar, 5 μm) (B) and quantification of (C) GFP-LC3 puncta or (D) endogenous LC3 puncta per venular EC area at 4 h and (E) at the indicated times postreperfusion (n = 3–6 mice/group). (F–H) GFP-Map1lc3 mice were treated intrascrotally (i.s.) with PBS or LPS. (F and G) Neutrophil extravasation (n = 3 mice/group) (F) and (G) representative (n = 3) confocal images of cremasteric PCVs (PECAM-1), with arrows indicating EC junctional localization of GFP-LC3 puncta (scale bar, 5 μm). (H) Quantification of GFP-LC3 puncta per venular EC area (n = 3 mice/group). Dashed boxes delineate magnified areas. Means ± SEMs. Statistically significant difference from controls or between indicated groups is shown by ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ns, not significant. See also Figure S1.

EC ATG5 deficiency promotes increased and faster neutrophil TEM

Hypothesizing a causal link between EC autophagy and neutrophil trafficking, we sought to analyze neutrophil extravasation in mice with selective EC deficiency in the essential autophagy regulatory gene Atg5 (Deretic and Levine, 2018; Ktistakis and Tooze, 2016). For this purpose, we used both constitutive (Cdh5-cre;Atg5 mice [Atg5]) and inducible models of EC Atg5 deletion (Cdh5(BAC)-creER; Rosa26 [Atg5]). Since autophagy is an essential cellular survival mechanism, maintaining energy homeostasis through self-catabolic activity (Levine and Kroemer, 2019), we explored the health status of ATG5-deficient ECs in vivo. We observed comparable profiles of vascularity within the cremaster muscle microcirculation of Atg5 mice as compared to their Cre− littermate controls, Atg5 (Figures S2A and S2B). Furthermore, there was no evidence of enhanced EC necrosis or apoptosis in unstimulated, or in IR-stimulated, cremaster muscles of Atg5 mice (Figures S2C–S2F). These results showed ATG5-deficient ECs to be viable and healthy in our experimental model. We next evaluated the impact of EC autophagy deficiency on neutrophil TEM, initially continuing the work using the constitutive EC Atg5 deletion model. Here, since the Cdh5-cre line is expressed in the embryonic hemogenic endothelium, which gives rise to recombined floxed alleles in ECs and hematopoietic lineages (Alva et al., 2006), we generated bone marrow chimeric mice to eliminate any potential impact of myeloid cell ATG5 deficiency on our readouts. To additionally provide a means of tracking neutrophil migration in real time, chimeric mice were generated by bone marrow transfer from Lyz2-EGFP genetically targeted mice (exhibiting EGFPhi neutrophils) to irradiated Atg5 and Atg5 mice. Analysis of total neutrophil infiltration in cremaster muscles of mice stimulated with local LPS or subjected to IR (4 h reperfusion) showed an increase in the infiltration of neutrophils in chimeric Atg5 mice in comparison to chimeric Atg5 controls (Figures 2A–2C). Similarly, inducible EC autophagy-deficient mice, Atg5, exhibited an elevated neutrophil infiltration response following cremaster muscle IR (Figure 2D). In investigating the potential pathophysiological consequences of the intense neutrophil infiltration caused by EC autophagy deficiency, propidium iodide positivity revealed an elevated number of damaged cells in inflamed tissues of Atg5 mice (Figure 2E). The propidium iodide-positive cells appeared to be predominantly tissue-infiltrated neutrophils, and there was no evidence of EC damage (Figures S2C and S2D). The latter confirmed the normal health status of ATG5-deficient ECs. These results indicated a negative regulatory role for EC autophagy in neutrophil infiltration into acutely inflamed tissues in vivo, providing a mechanism for protecting the host from excessive neutrophil-mediated tissue damage. To directly test this notion, and as a means of assessing a potential therapeutic strategy of controlling excessive neutrophil infiltration, we used a pharmacological approach to induce autophagy in vivo. Specifically, we used a cell-penetrant autophagy-inducing peptide, Tat-Beclin 1, that activates the master regulator of autophagy Beclin 1 (Peraro et al., 2017). Local application of Tat-Beclin 1, but not a scrambled control peptide, induced GFP-LC3 and endogenous LC3 puncta in venular ECs in an ATG5-dependent manner (Figures 2F and 2G). This pharmacological strategy suppressed neutrophil infiltration in IR-stimulated cremaster muscles (Figures 2H), an effect that was abrogated in Atg5 mice (Figure 2I), showing the efficacy of Tat-Beclin 1 to be specific to EC autophagy induction. The suppression of neutrophil infiltration into tissues by Tat-Beclin 1 was aligned with the increased retention of neutrophils within the vascular lumen (Figures 2J and 2K), suggesting a regulatory role for EC autophagy in neutrophil breaching of ECs.
Figure 2

Modulation of EC autophagy controls neutrophil extravasation and cellular tissue damage

(A and B) Neutrophil extravasation in chimeric Atg5 and Atg5 mice (A) treated i.s. with PBS or LPS and (B) subjected to local IR injury (n = 3–8 mice/group).

(C) Representative (n = 8) confocal images of IR-stimulated cremasteric PCVs (PECAM-1) immunostained for neutrophils (MRP14) (scale bar, 30 μm).

(D) Neutrophil extravasation in Atg5 and Atg5 mice subjected to local IR injury (n = 6 mice/group).

(E) Propidium iodide (PI)+ cells in Atg5 and Atg5 mice subjected to IR injury, as quantified by confocal IVM (n = 3–5 mice/group).

(F and G) GFP-LC3 puncta or endogenous LC3 puncta per venular EC area in cremasteric PCVs of (F) GFP-Map1lc3 mice and (G) Atg5 and Atg5 mice treated i.s. with scrambled or Tat-Beclin 1 peptide (n = 3–5 mice/group).

(H and I) Neutrophil extravasation in (H) WT mice and (I) Atg5 and Atg5 mice subjected to local IR injury and treated i.s. with scrambled or Tat-Beclin 1 (n = 4–6 mice/group).

(J and K) Intravascular neutrophils in WT mice subjected to local IR injury and treated i.s. with scrambled or Tat-Beclin 1 (n = 3–4 mice/group) (J), and (K) representative confocal images (n = 3–6) of cremasteric PCVs (PECAM-1) immunostained for neutrophils (MRP14) (scale bar, 30 μm).

Means ± SEMs. Statistically significant difference from controls or between indicated groups is shown by ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ns, not significant.

See also Figure S2.

Modulation of EC autophagy controls neutrophil extravasation and cellular tissue damage (A and B) Neutrophil extravasation in chimeric Atg5 and Atg5 mice (A) treated i.s. with PBS or LPS and (B) subjected to local IR injury (n = 3–8 mice/group). (C) Representative (n = 8) confocal images of IR-stimulated cremasteric PCVs (PECAM-1) immunostained for neutrophils (MRP14) (scale bar, 30 μm). (D) Neutrophil extravasation in Atg5 and Atg5 mice subjected to local IR injury (n = 6 mice/group). (E) Propidium iodide (PI)+ cells in Atg5 and Atg5 mice subjected to IR injury, as quantified by confocal IVM (n = 3–5 mice/group). (F and G) GFP-LC3 puncta or endogenous LC3 puncta per venular EC area in cremasteric PCVs of (F) GFP-Map1lc3 mice and (G) Atg5 and Atg5 mice treated i.s. with scrambled or Tat-Beclin 1 peptide (n = 3–5 mice/group). (H and I) Neutrophil extravasation in (H) WT mice and (I) Atg5 and Atg5 mice subjected to local IR injury and treated i.s. with scrambled or Tat-Beclin 1 (n = 4–6 mice/group). (J and K) Intravascular neutrophils in WT mice subjected to local IR injury and treated i.s. with scrambled or Tat-Beclin 1 (n = 3–4 mice/group) (J), and (K) representative confocal images (n = 3–6) of cremasteric PCVs (PECAM-1) immunostained for neutrophils (MRP14) (scale bar, 30 μm). Means ± SEMs. Statistically significant difference from controls or between indicated groups is shown by ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ns, not significant. See also Figure S2. To delineate the stage of neutrophil trafficking regulated by EC ATG5, we used high-resolution confocal IVM (Girbl et al., 2018; Woodfin et al., 2011). Focusing on the inflammatory reaction induced by IR, we observed no difference in neutrophil adhesion to venular ECs between Atg5 and Atg5 mice (Figure 3A). However, a significant increase (3-fold) in the number of neutrophil TEM events (Figure 3B), as well as a reduction in the duration of neutrophil TEM (Figure 3C), were detected in Atg5 mice when compared to Atg5 littermates. As combining the Rosa-26-Tomato Cre reporter onto the Atg5 background provided a visual means of identifying ATG5-sufficient ECs (tdTomato−; Atg5, hereafter referred to as WT) and ATG5-deficient counterparts (tdTomato+; Atg5−/−, hereafter referred to as Atg5−/−) by confocal IVM (Figure 3D), we sought to take advantage of this phenomenon for our analysis. Specifically, noting a mosaic pattern of tdTomato expression (∼40%) in PCVs of the cremaster muscle microcirculation (Figure 3D), we directly compared the profile and dynamics of neutrophil TEM events in relation to WT and Atg5−/− ECs within the same venular segments. Importantly, the genetic status of the model was validated by quantifying Atg5 and tdTomato mRNA in tdTomato+ (Tmt+) versus tdTomato− (Tmt−) isolated lung ECs (Figure S3A) and by demonstrating the exclusive formation of LC3 puncta in Tmt− cremaster muscle ECs following starvation, as quantified by IF (Figure S3B). Since preliminary work showed a similar neutrophil TEM phenotype between WT-Atg5−/− and Atg5−/−-Atg5−/− cellular contacts, to analyze neutrophil diapedesis, EC-EC junctions formed entirely by Tmt- ECs or those shared by at least one Tmt+ EC were called WT and Atg5−/− junctions, respectively (Figure 3D). This approach revealed that higher numbers of neutrophils breached Atg5−/− junctions, predominantly in a paracellular mode, as compared to the frequency of neutrophils that penetrated WT junctions (Figure 3E). While WT ECs supported almost no incidence of neutrophil transcellular TEM, in line with our previous findings (Woodfin et al., 2011), Atg5−/− ECs showed a significant increase in neutrophil transcellular TEM (∼8-fold greater; Figures 3F and S3C). Although leukocyte transcellular TEM across inflamed brain ECs is prevalent (Engelhardt and Ransohoff, 2012), our findings offer EC ATG5 deficiency as a basis for transcellular neutrophil TEM in the peripheral circulation. In agreement with the higher frequency of neutrophil TEM events across Atg5−/− junctions, autophagy-deficient junctions exhibited distinct hotspots wherein the junctions under investigation supported multiple sequential neutrophil TEM responses (Figure 3G; Video S1). This phenomenon, which included at times up to 8 neutrophil TEM occurrences through the same pore (Video S2), and the prolonged duration of pore openings (Figure 3H), were associated with a significant increase in the number of PECAM-1 pores created at Atg5−/− junctions (Figures 3I and 3J). The latter suggests that within the same venule, neutrophils were 3 times more likely to go through an Atg5−/− junction than a WT junction. These distinct regions, with a high capacity to support neutrophil TEM, presented unusually enlarged PECAM-1-labeled areas (Figure 3J), demonstrating the existence of aberrant EC protein amounts and localization within autophagy-deficient junctions. Atg5 mice, in comparison to Atg5 littermates, also exhibited enhanced vascular permeability, as assessed by the leakage of intravenously (i.v.)-injected fluorescent beads (20 nm in diameter) (Figure S3D), further indicating the aberrant functionality of autophagy-deficient EC junctions. Collectively, neutrophils exhibited exaggerated and faster migration across ATG5-deficient venular endothelium, revealing EC autophagy as an effective modulator of neutrophil TEM dynamics.
Figure 3

EC ATG5 deficiency promotes increased and faster neutrophil TEM

(A–C) Chimeric Atg5 and Atg5 mice were subjected to local IR injury and neutrophil responses in cremasteric PCVs analyzed by confocal real-time IVM. Neutrophil (A) adhesion, (B) TEM, and (C) duration of TEM.

(D) Representative confocal images (n = 7) of cremasteric PCVs (PECAM-1) immunostained for neutrophils (MRP14), highlighting mosaic distribution of ECs, with arrows indicating Atg5 and WT junctions (scale bars, 15 μm).

(E–G) Neutrophil (E) paracellular and (F) transcellular TEM and (G) TEM through hotspots in WT and Atg5 junctions of chimeric Atg5 mice.

(H and I) Pore (H) opening duration and (I) number within chimeric Atg5 mice (n = 5–7 mice/group).

(J) Representative (n = 5) confocal images illustrating an Atg5 junction exhibiting multiple PECAM-1 pores (arrows; scale bars, 15 μm). Dashed boxes delineate magnified areas.

Means ± SEMs. Statistically significant difference from controls or between indicated groups is shown by ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01; ns, not significant.

See also Figure S3.

EC ATG5 deficiency promotes increased and faster neutrophil TEM (A–C) Chimeric Atg5 and Atg5 mice were subjected to local IR injury and neutrophil responses in cremasteric PCVs analyzed by confocal real-time IVM. Neutrophil (A) adhesion, (B) TEM, and (C) duration of TEM. (D) Representative confocal images (n = 7) of cremasteric PCVs (PECAM-1) immunostained for neutrophils (MRP14), highlighting mosaic distribution of ECs, with arrows indicating Atg5 and WT junctions (scale bars, 15 μm). (E–G) Neutrophil (E) paracellular and (F) transcellular TEM and (G) TEM through hotspots in WT and Atg5 junctions of chimeric Atg5 mice. (H and I) Pore (H) opening duration and (I) number within chimeric Atg5 mice (n = 5–7 mice/group). (J) Representative (n = 5) confocal images illustrating an Atg5 junction exhibiting multiple PECAM-1 pores (arrows; scale bars, 15 μm). Dashed boxes delineate magnified areas. Means ± SEMs. Statistically significant difference from controls or between indicated groups is shown by ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01; ns, not significant. See also Figure S3.

Video S1. EC Atg5 junctions have a high capacity to support neutrophil TEM, related to Figure 1

The confocal IVM movie captures the reperfusion phase of a cremaster muscle post-capillary venular segment following 40 min of ischemia of the tissue from a chimeric Atg5 mouse exhibiting GFP+ neutrophils (green) and tdTomato- (white; WT) or tdTomato+ (magenta; Atg5−/−) ECs. EC junctions were immunostained in vivo with an AF-647-anti-PECAM-1 mAb (blue). The movie tracks 4 luminal neutrophils migrating through the same Atg5−/− junction (formed between two Atg5−/− ECs) at different time points of the reperfusion period. Each individual neutrophil TEM event is associated with the formation of a transient pore within the PECAM-1 labeled EC junction. After completion of TEM, neutrophils crawl along the abluminal side of the EC surface prior to entering the interstitial space. The image sequence captures the first 2 hours of the reperfusion phase. For enhanced clarity, tracked neutrophils undergoing TEM were isolated from the inflammatory response by creating an isosurface using Imaris software. Scale bar, 10 μm.

Video S2. EC Atg5 junctions support multiple and sequential neutrophil TEM events through the same pore, related to Figure 1

The confocal IVM movie captures the reperfusion phase of a cremaster muscle post-capillary venular segment following 40 min of ischemia of the tissue from a chimeric Atg5 mouse exhibiting GFP+ neutrophils (green) and tdTomato- (white; WT) or tdTomato+ (magenta; Atg5−/−) ECs. EC junctions were labeled in vivo with an AF-647-anti-PECAM-1 mAb (blue). The video tracks up to 8 neutrophils migrating through the same PECAM-1 junctional pore formed between a WT and an adjacent Atg5−/− EC over a period of 2 hours. Of note, the PECAM-1 pore remains open during the entire image acquisition period. For enhanced clarity, tracked neutrophils undergoing TEM were isolated from the inflammatory response by creating an isosurface using Imaris software. Scale bar, 5 μm.

ATG5-dependent autophagy regulates the architecture and molecular composition of EC contacts

To explore the junctional phenotype of Atg5−/− cells in greater detail, we analyzed the expression of two integral EC junctional components, VE-cadherin and PECAM-1 (Dejana et al., 2009; Muller, 2016; Reglero-Real et al., 2016), in control and inflamed cremasteric microcirculation of Atg5 and Atg5 mice by IF. In Atg5 mice, control sham-treated muscles and tissues subjected to IR (4 and 8 h post reperfusion) showed the characteristic defined junctional expressions of VE-cadherin and PECAM-1 (Figure 4A). In contrast, the tissues of Atg5 mice exhibited distinctly thickened junctions, typified by the enrichment of VE-cadherin and PECAM-1 (Figure 4A). These thickened EC contact sites were aligned exclusively with Atg5−/− junctions and were commonly >2 μm in width, as compared to an average of ∼1 μm in Atg5 mice and WT junctions of Atg5 mice (Figures 4B–4D). Furthermore, the frequency and size of aberrant Atg5−/− junctional regions increased with the reperfusion time (Figures 4B–4D) and expressed ∼2- to 4-fold more immunoreactive PECAM-1 and VE-cadherin as compared to junctions in Atg5 mice (Figures 4E and 4F). In aiming to investigate this phenomenon in a different vascular bed, we analyzed the expression of multiple leukocyte trafficking molecules on lung ECs (LECs) isolated from untreated Atg5 mice or Atg5 mice subjected to a model of endotoxemia characterized by enhanced lung vascular permeability (Figure S4A). Here, we found increased cell-surface protein amounts of adhesion molecules PECAM-1, VE-cadherin, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), ICAM-2, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and E-selectin in Atg5−/− (Tmt+) as compared to WT (Tmt−) ECs (Figures 4G and 4H). However, Atg5−/− LECs showed no difference in mRNA expression of the molecules (apart from VCAM-1) under basal or inflammatory conditions (Figures S4B and S4C). These results rule out differential transcriptional regulation as a dominant cause of the enhanced protein detected. Stimulated WT and Atg5−/− LECs exhibited similar amounts of the chemokine C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptors I and II (Figure 4H), suggesting selective regulation of integral membrane leukocyte trafficking machinery by EC ATG5. In addition, Atg5 mice recapitulated the aberrant junctional phenotype observed in constitutive Atg5 upon IR (Figure S4D).
Figure 4

ATG5-dependent autophagy regulates the architecture and molecular composition of EC contacts

(A–F) Atg5 and Atg5 mice were subjected to local IR injury.

(A and B) Representative confocal images (n = 3–4) of cremasteric PCVs (PECAM-1 and VE-cadherin) showing aberrant, thickened junctional structures (arrowheads) (A) and (B) frequency of thickened junctions (n = 3–4 mice/group).

(C–F) Quantification of PECAM-1 and VE-cadherin (C and D) junctional width and (E and F) junctional enrichment (n = 3 mice/group).

(G and H) Cell surface proteins under (G) basal and (H) endotoxemia conditions in WT and ATG5-deficient lung ECs from Atg5 mice (n = 3–8 mice/group).

(I–N) Correlative light electron microscopy (CLEM) analysis of a venular segment in an IR-stimulated Atg5 mouse (n = 1).

(I) Serial-block face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM) micrograph of the region of interest (ROI) (targeted as shown in Video S3), illustrating segmentation of ECs.

(J) Confocal image showing WT and Atg5 ECs within the ROI, with the latter exhibiting thickened PECAM-1 junctional structures (arrowhead and asterisk).

(K) 3D reconstruction of segmented ECs and cell-cell contacts of the venular area depicted in (J).

(L–N) Enlargements of the 3D model illustrating (L) WT-WT and (M and N) Atg5-Atg5 cell contacts showing areas of enlarged contacts (arrowhead) and membrane flaps (asterisk, scale bars, 1 μm).

(O) Neutrophil extravasation in Atg5 and Atg5 mice subjected to IR injury and treated with an isotype control or anti-PECAM-1-blocking mAb (n = 3–4 mice/group). Dashed boxes delineate magnified areas.

Means ± SEMs. Statistically significant difference from controls or between indicated groups is shown by ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Scale bars, 5 μm, unless otherwise specified.

See also Figure S4.

ATG5-dependent autophagy regulates the architecture and molecular composition of EC contacts (A–F) Atg5 and Atg5 mice were subjected to local IR injury. (A and B) Representative confocal images (n = 3–4) of cremasteric PCVs (PECAM-1 and VE-cadherin) showing aberrant, thickened junctional structures (arrowheads) (A) and (B) frequency of thickened junctions (n = 3–4 mice/group). (C–F) Quantification of PECAM-1 and VE-cadherin (C and D) junctional width and (E and F) junctional enrichment (n = 3 mice/group). (G and H) Cell surface proteins under (G) basal and (H) endotoxemia conditions in WT and ATG5-deficient lung ECs from Atg5 mice (n = 3–8 mice/group). (I–N) Correlative light electron microscopy (CLEM) analysis of a venular segment in an IR-stimulated Atg5 mouse (n = 1). (I) Serial-block face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM) micrograph of the region of interest (ROI) (targeted as shown in Video S3), illustrating segmentation of ECs. (J) Confocal image showing WT and Atg5 ECs within the ROI, with the latter exhibiting thickened PECAM-1 junctional structures (arrowhead and asterisk). (K) 3D reconstruction of segmented ECs and cell-cell contacts of the venular area depicted in (J). (L–N) Enlargements of the 3D model illustrating (L) WT-WT and (M and N) Atg5-Atg5 cell contacts showing areas of enlarged contacts (arrowhead) and membrane flaps (asterisk, scale bars, 1 μm). (O) Neutrophil extravasation in Atg5 and Atg5 mice subjected to IR injury and treated with an isotype control or anti-PECAM-1-blocking mAb (n = 3–4 mice/group). Dashed boxes delineate magnified areas. Means ± SEMs. Statistically significant difference from controls or between indicated groups is shown by ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Scale bars, 5 μm, unless otherwise specified. See also Figure S4. To gain insight into potential changes in the architecture of ATG5-deficient EC contacts at the ultrastructural level, we applied correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) to analyze IR-stimulated tissues of Atg5 mice. For this purpose, we implemented a method for aligning confocal microscopy and microscopic X-ray computed tomography (micro-CT) imaging to locate regions of interest (ROIs) within EM-processed samples (see Method details; Video S3). With this approach, we analyzed a PCV incorporating 2 WT (cells 1 and 2) and 3 Atg5 ECs (cells 3, 4, and 5) (Video S3). Imaging of this ROI by serial-block face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM), followed by segmentation of individual ECs (Figures 4I and S4E; Video S4) and cell-cell contacts (Figure S4F), generated a three-dimensional (3D) model that correlated PECAM-1 IF staining with apposed lateral plasma membranes of adjacent ECs (Figures 4J and 4K; Video S5). The latter is in agreement with previous EM findings (Feng et al., 2004). The contacts formed between ECs, as defined by the maximum distance that enables PECAM-1 homophilic interactions (≤25 nm) (Jiang et al., 2016), were enlarged between Atg5- Atg5 and WT-Atg5 cells as compared to WT-WT contacts (Figures 4K–4M and S4G). Furthermore, the images revealed Atg5 ECs exhibiting PECAM-1-enriched non-contact sites that appeared as sheet-like plasma membrane projections or flaps in close proximity to cell-cell contacts, representing regions of cellular overlap (Figure 4N; Video S5). This ultrastructural analysis identified Atg5 junctions as enlarged and potentially more accessible regions for neutrophils to breach, presenting a mechanism for the observed enhanced neutrophil TEM. Notably, the treatment of mice with a blocking anti-PECAM-1 mAb abrogated neutrophil infiltration in both control and Atg5 mice (Figure 4O). These data support the notion that accumulated proteins at Atg5 contacts are accessible to migrating neutrophils and facilitate exaggerated neutrophil trafficking across ATG5-deficient venular ECs. Collectively, ATG5-deficient ECs exhibited aberrant molecular and cellular features that can account for excessive neutrophil trafficking across autophagy-deficient endothelium.

Video S3. Region of interest (ROI) targeting for correlative light electron microscopy (CLEM), related to Figure 3

Video illustrating the workflow developed to target a region of interest (ROI) by confocal microscopy for subsequent imaging by serial block face scanning electron microscopy (SBF SEM) in the IR-stimulated microcirculation of an Atg5 mouse. The designated ROI shows a combination of WT (tdTomato-) and Atg5−/− (tdTomato+) ECs. The position of the ROI selected by confocal microscopy was identified in the cremaster tissue by X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) guided by tissue shape and venules as landmarks allowing the tissue to be trimmed around the ROI. The tdTomato signal of the confocal 63 × Z stack image was aligned to the SBF SEM data based on nuclei positions and overlaid to the EM data.

Video S4. Segmentation of ECs using TrakEM2 (Fiji), related to Figure 3

Serial block face scanning electron microscopy imaging of the ROI targeted as shown in Video S3 in an IR-stimulated Atg5 venule. The lower panel illustrates the selection and segmentation of ECs through the generation of AreaLists using the TrakEM2 Fiji tool in the region of thickened PECAM-1+ junctional sites depicted by confocal microscopy. BM; Basement membrane. Scale bar, 5 μm. Still images corresponding to this video are shown in Figures 4I, S4E, and S4F.

Video S5. ATG5-dependent autophagy regulates EC contact architecture, related to Figure 3

3D reconstruction of the segmented ECs imaged by SBF-SEM in the ROI selected by confocal microscopy within an IR-stimulated Atg5 venule. Individual ECs are depicted using different colors and cell-cell contacts (closely apposed plasma membranes) are shown between Atg5−/−-Atg5−/− and WT- Atg5−/− (white) or WT-WT (cyan) ECs. Arrows indicate enlarged contacts and membrane flaps between Atg5−/− ECs. Scale bar, 5 μm. Still images corresponding to this video are shown in Figures 4K–4N and S4G.

EC autophagy machinery regulates PECAM-1 intracellular trafficking and degradation

Having found that defective EC autophagy leads to the accumulation of cell surface molecules, most notably junctional proteins, we next investigated the role of the autophagy machinery in their dynamics and turnover. Because we showed that neutrophil trafficking in Atg5 mice is PECAM-1 dependent (Figure 4O), we focused on this molecule under conditions of autophagy deficiency as an illustration of endothelial leukocyte-trafficking machinery. Initially using an in vitro approach, we analyzed PECAM-1 expression in human umbilical vein ECs (HUVECs) treated with the vacuolar H+ ATPase inhibitor bafilomycin A1 that prevents the fusion between autophagosomes and lysosomes. Within this model, while autophagic degradation activity (autophagic flux) was suppressed, as indicated by LC3-II accumulation, PECAM-1 total protein and co-localization with lysosomal-associated membrane protein-1 (LAMP-1) were enhanced (Figures S5A–S5C). The latter indicated that PECAM-1 traffics into LAMP-1+ compartments destined for degradation. Bafilomycin A1 treatment of HUVECs also resulted in increased neutrophil TEM in a PECAM-1-dependent manner (Figure S5D), in line with the in vivo data acquired from Atg5 mice (Figures 2A, 2B, 3B, and 4O). Next, we small interfering RNA (siRNA) silenced ATG5 in HUVECs, a strategy that reduced ATG5 protein expression and LC3-II accumulation by ∼60% (Figure S5E). To model an acute inflammatory scenario, we examined LPS (4 h)-stimulated control and ATG5-silenced HUVECs for the dynamics and degradation kinetics of cell surface PECAM-1 post-internalization through pulse-chase experiments (Figure 5A). Here, by labeling endogenous cell surface PECAM-1 with cell-impermeant sulfo-NHS-biotin and then chasing this pool over time, we noted that the biotinylated PECAM-1 fraction degraded more rapidly in control than in ATG5-silenced HUVECs (Figures 5B and 5C). As a complementary approach, we labeled GFP-LC3-transfected HUVECS with a non-blocking AF555-anti-PECAM-1 mAb, a strategy that distinctly delineated junctionally localized PECAM-1 (Figure S5F, upper left panel). After 0.5 h of this immunolabeling, the antibody internalized and began to distribute to intracellular vesicles (Figure S5F, lower left panel). At 2 and 4 h postantibody labeling, a fraction of GFP-LC3 vesicles (17% and 20%, respectively) directly co-localized with PECAM-1 (Figures 5D, S5F, and S5G ). Furthermore, super-resolution and live cell confocal imaging demonstrated the recruitment of GFP-LC3 to PECAM-1+ vesicles in real time (Figures 5E and S5H; Video S6). Likewise, LPS-stimulated ECs revealed partial co-localization of GFP-LC3 vesicles with VE-cadherin (Figures S5I and S5J). Since ATG5 is mechanistically linked to diverse membrane trafficking pathways (Ktistakis and Tooze, 2016), to investigate the role of canonical autophagy in PECAM-1 trafficking, we tracked the recruitment of the ATG16L1-interacting protein WIPI2 (WD repeat domain, phosphoinositide-interacting protein 2) to GFP-LC3+-PECAM-1+ compartments. Immunostaining of fixed GFP-LC3-transfected HUVECs with an anti-WIPI2 mAb revealed WIPI2 co-localization with GFP-LC3 vesicles (Figures S5K and S5L). This is consistent with the role of WIPI2 in LC3 recruitment to developing autophagosomes (Dooley et al., 2014). However, the majority of GFP-LC3+-PECAM-1+ vesicles (>90%) were devoid of WIPI2 staining (Figures 5F and 5G), suggesting that the targeting of LC3 to PECAM-1+ compartments is principally mediated by ATG5-dependent non-canonical autophagy mechanisms. Collectively, cell-surface PECAM-1 distributes to LC3+ compartments and is partially degraded in an ATG5-dependent manner in stimulated ECs.
Figure 5

EC autophagy machinery regulates cell-surface PECAM-1 intracellular trafficking and degradation

(A–C) Schematic illustrating cell-surface biotinylation method. Control and ATG5 siRNA-silenced HUVECs were stimulated with LPS (A) and (B) immunoblotted for total and biotinylated PECAM-1, ATG5, and β-actin at the indicated times postbiotin incubation and (C) analyzed for fold change in cell surface-derived PECAM-1 (n = 7).

(D–G) GFP-LC3 transfected HUVECs were stimulated with LPS before antibody feeding using a nonblocking anti-PECAM-1 mAb.

(D) Number of GFP-LC3+/ PECAM-1+ vesicles at the indicated times after incubation with anti-PECAM-1 mAb (n = 3–5; 40–100 cells analyzed per condition).

(E) Time-lapse confocal images (Video S6) showing the formation of GFP-LC3+/PECAM-1+ vesicles (scale bars, 10 μm).

(F and G) Representative (n = 4) confocal images of GFP-LC3 transfected HUVECs immunostained for PECAM-1 and WIPI2 (scale bars, 10 μm and enlargements, 3 μm) (F) and (G) quantification of the number of GFP-LC3+/ PECAM-1+ vesicles WIPI2-/+ (n = 4; >100 cells analyzed per condition).

Means ± SEMs. Statistically significant difference from controls is shown by ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01.

See also Figure S5.

EC autophagy machinery regulates cell-surface PECAM-1 intracellular trafficking and degradation (A–C) Schematic illustrating cell-surface biotinylation method. Control and ATG5 siRNA-silenced HUVECs were stimulated with LPS (A) and (B) immunoblotted for total and biotinylated PECAM-1, ATG5, and β-actin at the indicated times postbiotin incubation and (C) analyzed for fold change in cell surface-derived PECAM-1 (n = 7). (D–G) GFP-LC3 transfected HUVECs were stimulated with LPS before antibody feeding using a nonblocking anti-PECAM-1 mAb. (D) Number of GFP-LC3+/ PECAM-1+ vesicles at the indicated times after incubation with anti-PECAM-1 mAb (n = 3–5; 40–100 cells analyzed per condition). (E) Time-lapse confocal images (Video S6) showing the formation of GFP-LC3+/PECAM-1+ vesicles (scale bars, 10 μm). (F and G) Representative (n = 4) confocal images of GFP-LC3 transfected HUVECs immunostained for PECAM-1 and WIPI2 (scale bars, 10 μm and enlargements, 3 μm) (F) and (G) quantification of the number of GFP-LC3+/ PECAM-1+ vesicles WIPI2-/+ (n = 4; >100 cells analyzed per condition). Means ± SEMs. Statistically significant difference from controls is shown by ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01. See also Figure S5.

Video S6. HUVECs exhibit co-localization of GFP-LC3 and anti-PECAM-1-labeled vesicles, related to Figure 3

Confocal time-lapse imaging of GFP-LC3 transfected HUVECs stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL). PECAM-1 was labeled by antibody feeding using a non-blocking AF-555-anti-PECAM-1 mAb (2 μg/mL) added to the cells 5 min before image acquisition. The time-lapse sequence shows an internalized PECAM-1 vesicle associating with GFP-LC3 over a period of 20 min. Still images corresponding to this video are shown in Figure 5E.

Non-canonical autophagy operates in microvascular ECs and regulates PECAM-1 distribution in inflamed tissues

A growing body of evidence suggests that, in addition to canonical autophagy, other trafficking pathways that use a subset of ATG proteins can result in the conjugation of LC3 to non-autophagosome compartments independently of WIPI2 (Ktistakis and Tooze, 2016; Martinez et al., 2016; Martinez-Martin et al., 2017). Since we found no evidence for WIPI2 recruitment to GFP-LC3+-PECAM-1+ compartments in HUVECs (Figures 5F and 5G), we investigated a potential role for non-canonical pathways in LC3 membrane recruitment during inflammation in venular ECs. In line with our in vitro findings, we found that >90% of GFP-LC3 puncta in IR-stimulated postcapillary venular ECs were WIPI2− (Figures 6A and 6B), further suggesting that non-canonical autophagy mechanisms could be operating in venular ECs in vivo. As ATG5-dependent non-canonical autophagy pathways, such as LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP), involve the degradation of internalized plasma membrane and cell surface receptors (Florey et al., 2011; Martinez et al., 2016; Sanjuan et al., 2007), we explored the possibility that a similar pathway to LAP could be regulating the formation of LC3 puncta in ECs. Here, we used mice lacking the WD40 repeat-containing C-terminal domain of Atg16L1 (Atg16L1, hereafter referred to as Atg16l1) that is essential for LC3 recruitment to endolysosomal membranes in LAP, but dispensable for canonical autophagy (Fletcher et al., 2018; Rai et al., 2019). Notably, IR-stimulated (4 h reperfusion) venular ECs of Atg16L1 mice exhibited significantly reduced numbers of LC3 puncta as compared to ECs of littermate control mice, as analyzed by IF (Figures 6C and 6D). Because this inhibition (∼53%) was similar to that detected in Atg5 ECs (∼78%), as compared to WT ECs in Atg5 mice, the results identify the WD40 domain of ATG16L1 as a regulator of LC3 targeting to membranes in inflamed microvascular ECs in vivo. Functionally, as observed in Atg5 mice, IR-stimulated postcapillary venular ECs of Atg16L1 mice exhibited significant enrichment (>40%) of PECAM-1 at cell-cell contacts as compared to WT littermates (Figures 6E–6G) and showed a trend toward increased (>20%) VE-cadherin accumulation at junctions (Figures 6E, S6A, and S6B). These results identify a previously unknown role for a LAP-like non-canonical autophagy pathway in the regulation of EC junctional proteins in acute inflammation.
Figure 6

Non-canonical autophagy operates in microvascular ECs and regulates PECAM-1 distribution in response to IR injury

(A and B) GFP-Map1lc3 mice were subjected to local IR injury.

(A and B) Representative (n = 3) confocal images of cremasteric PCVs (PECAM-1) immunostained for WIPI2, showing GFP-LC3+ and WIPI2+ puncta (scale bar, 5 μm) (A) and (B) number of GFP-LC3+/WIPI2-/+ puncta per venular EC area (n = 3 mice/group).

(C and D) Atg5, WT, and Atg16L1 mice were subjected to local IR injury.

(C) Representative (n = 3–5) confocal images of cremasteric PCVs (PECAM-1) immunostained for endogenous LC3, with arrows indicating localization of LC3 puncta (scale bar, 5 μm).

(D) Number of LC3 puncta per venular EC area (n = 3–5 mice/group).

(E–G) WT and Atg16L1 mice were subjected to local IR injury.

(E) Representative (n = 3) confocal images of cremasteric PCVs (PECAM-1, VE-cadherin) (scale bars, 5 and 3 μm for enlargements) and associated quantification of PECAM-1.

(F and G) Junctional width (F) and (G) junctional enrichment (n = 3 mice/group).

Means ± SEMs. Statistically significant difference from controls is shown by ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001.

See also Figure S6.

Non-canonical autophagy operates in microvascular ECs and regulates PECAM-1 distribution in response to IR injury (A and B) GFP-Map1lc3 mice were subjected to local IR injury. (A and B) Representative (n = 3) confocal images of cremasteric PCVs (PECAM-1) immunostained for WIPI2, showing GFP-LC3+ and WIPI2+ puncta (scale bar, 5 μm) (A) and (B) number of GFP-LC3+/WIPI2-/+ puncta per venular EC area (n = 3 mice/group). (C and D) Atg5, WT, and Atg16L1 mice were subjected to local IR injury. (C) Representative (n = 3–5) confocal images of cremasteric PCVs (PECAM-1) immunostained for endogenous LC3, with arrows indicating localization of LC3 puncta (scale bar, 5 μm). (D) Number of LC3 puncta per venular EC area (n = 3–5 mice/group). (E–G) WT and Atg16L1 mice were subjected to local IR injury. (E) Representative (n = 3) confocal images of cremasteric PCVs (PECAM-1, VE-cadherin) (scale bars, 5 and 3 μm for enlargements) and associated quantification of PECAM-1. (F and G) Junctional width (F) and (G) junctional enrichment (n = 3 mice/group). Means ± SEMs. Statistically significant difference from controls is shown by ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. See also Figure S6.

Genetic ablation of vascular autophagy leads to dysregulated neutrophil trafficking in multiple inflammatory models

To examine the broader functional consequences of ATG5-dependent modulation of EC junctions in vivo, we analyzed the impact of EC deficiency of ATG5 and the WD40 domain of ATG16L1 on leukocyte trafficking within multiple inflammatory models. Chimeric Atg5 mice exhibited enhanced neutrophil infiltration in an LPS-driven peritonitis model (Figure 7A) and in cutaneous models of inflammation as induced by locally injected LPS and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) (Figure 7B). Similarly, using the inducible mouse model, acute EC ATG5 deficiency promoted increased neutrophil infiltration in the LPS-driven peritonitis model (Figure 7C). In conjunction with the findings acquired from LPS- and IR-stimulated cremaster muscles (Figures 2A–2C), these results demonstrate that EC ATG5 can regulate neutrophil trafficking in multiple organs and in response to a range of stimuli. Moreover, ubiquitous Atg16L1 mice, or chimeric Atg16L1 mice exhibiting WT hematopoietic cells, showed increased neutrophil accumulation in a muramyl dipeptide (MDP)-induced peritonitis model and in response to IR in the cremaster muscle (Figures 7D–7F). Excessive neutrophil infiltration under conditions of EC ATG5 deficiency or EC ATG16L1 truncation suggested a non-redundant role for EC autophagy processes as principal modulators of acute inflammation. To investigate this further, we used a zymosan-induced peritonitis model of self-resolving acute inflammation (Damazo et al., 2006) to analyze the impact of EC ATG5 deficiency on the temporal profile of an inflammatory reaction in vivo. Locally injected zymosan elicited a rapid infiltration of neutrophils within the peritoneal cavity of chimeric Atg5 mice, a response that peaked by 28 h and declined toward basal after 40 h (Figure 7G). Chimeric Atg5 mice showed a more rapid neutrophil recruitment, peaking at 16 h (Figure 7G), supporting the concept that EC autophagy restrains the breaching of venules and hence the onset of neutrophil infiltration in this model. The resolution phase of this reaction, which is known to be mediated by numerous responses at the inflammatory site, such as generation of pro-resolution mediators (Buckley et al., 2014; Perretti et al., 2017), was not impeded by EC autophagy (Figure 7G). Within this reaction, we also detected the enhanced recruitment of monocytes and eosinophils in chimeric Atg5 mice (Figures 7H and 7I), demonstrating that the regulatory role of EC autophagy can be extrapolated to the trafficking of other leukocyte subtypes. Collectively, EC autophagy pathways played a pivotal role in modulating leukocyte trafficking in multiple acute inflammatory models in vivo.
Figure 7

Genetic ablation of vascular autophagy (canonical and non-canonical) promotes exaggerated and more rapid leukocyte trafficking

(A and B) Chimeric Atg5 and Atg5 mice were subjected to (A) LPS-induced peritonitis (n = 6–12 mice/group) or (B) skin inflammation (n = 5–6 mice/group), and neutrophil infiltration was quantified by flow cytometry or myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, respectively.

(C) Atg5 and Atg5 mice were subjected to LPS-induced peritonitis, and neutrophil infiltration was quantified by flow cytometry (n = 4–9 mice/group).

(D) WT and Atg16L1 mice were subjected to MDP-induced peritonitis, and neutrophil infiltration was quantified by flow cytometry (n = 4–5 mice/group).

(E and F) Non-chimeric (E) and (F) chimeric WT and Atg16L1 mice were subjected to local IR injury, and neutrophil extravasation was assessed by confocal microscopy (n = 6–8 mice/group).

(G–I) Chimeric Atg5 and Atg5 mice were subjected to zymosan-induced peritonitis, and infiltration of (G) neutrophils, (H) monocytes, and (I) eosinophils at the indicated times was quantified by flow cytometry (n = 3–9 mice/group).

Means ± SEMs. Statistically significant difference from controls or between indicated groups is shown by ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001.

Genetic ablation of vascular autophagy (canonical and non-canonical) promotes exaggerated and more rapid leukocyte trafficking (A and B) Chimeric Atg5 and Atg5 mice were subjected to (A) LPS-induced peritonitis (n = 6–12 mice/group) or (B) skin inflammation (n = 5–6 mice/group), and neutrophil infiltration was quantified by flow cytometry or myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, respectively. (C) Atg5 and Atg5 mice were subjected to LPS-induced peritonitis, and neutrophil infiltration was quantified by flow cytometry (n = 4–9 mice/group). (D) WT and Atg16L1 mice were subjected to MDP-induced peritonitis, and neutrophil infiltration was quantified by flow cytometry (n = 4–5 mice/group). (E and F) Non-chimeric (E) and (F) chimeric WT and Atg16L1 mice were subjected to local IR injury, and neutrophil extravasation was assessed by confocal microscopy (n = 6–8 mice/group). (G–I) Chimeric Atg5 and Atg5 mice were subjected to zymosan-induced peritonitis, and infiltration of (G) neutrophils, (H) monocytes, and (I) eosinophils at the indicated times was quantified by flow cytometry (n = 3–9 mice/group). Means ± SEMs. Statistically significant difference from controls or between indicated groups is shown by ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001.

Discussion

Despite our growing understanding of the cellular and molecular events that support the onset and progression of neutrophil diapedesis, details of the mechanisms that terminate this response remain unclear. Here, we have identified EC autophagy as a molecular basis for the cessation of leukocyte recruitment in acute physiological inflammation. Specifically, we demonstrated that venular ECs upregulate autophagy in response to inflammation in vivo, and that genetic ablation of this reaction leads to increased tissue infiltration of neutrophils and tissue damage. Mechanistically, EC autophagy was necessary for regulating the expression of key EC adhesion molecules, most notably the trafficking and degradation of junctional molecules. These results present EC autophagy as a negative regulator of neutrophil TEM in acute inflammatory conditions. The molecular basis of limiting inflammation is intricate and multifactorial. While inflammatory triggers can be disposed through enzymatic degradation, there is now substantial interest in the molecular basis and mode of action of endogenously generated pro-resolution pathways that can actively suppress leukocyte recruitment (Perretti et al., 2017; Serhan and Levy, 2018). In addition, at the onset of an inflammatory reaction, leukocyte breaching of venular walls is controlled by altered expression and localization of key EC adhesion molecules (Nourshargh and Alon, 2014; Reglero-Real et al., 2016). As an example, aligned with efficient diapedesis, junctional molecules such as PECAM-1 and VE-cadherin exhibit intracellular recycling and degradation (Muller, 2016; Vestweber, 2015), although details of the associated molecular machineries require further exploration. Here, we explored the involvement of EC autophagy in neutrophil migration. The role of this degradative process as an essential regulator of immunity and inflammation is well established, but the concomitant mechanisms are complex and not fully defined (Deretic and Levine, 2018). Nonetheless, there is ample evidence for immune cell autophagy-related genes dampening inflammation, including diminishing immune cell trafficking. In contrast, while emerging in vivo evidence links autophagy-related genes to a wide array of EC functions, including shear stress-induced homeostasis, angiogenesis, and thrombosis (Sprott et al., 2019; Torisu et al., 2013; Vion et al., 2017; Verhoeven et al., 2021; Harlé et al., 2021), knowledge of EC autophagy as a regulator of inflammation is limited. Our findings demonstrated the occurrence and spatiotemporal regulation of autophagy (using GFP-LC3 puncta as readout) in acutely inflamed postcapillary venular ECs in vivo. We directly associated the induction of EC autophagy with the dynamics of neutrophil recruitment, suggesting a role for EC autophagy beyond the regulation of cell survival as previously described in inflammatory models of perturbed EC redox state (Schaaf et al., 2019). The localization of GFP-LC3 puncta at EC-EC contacts of inflamed tissues suggested a role for autophagic processes in neutrophil breaching of venular ECs. Simultaneous analysis of neutrophil interactions with WT or ATG5-deficient ECs within the same venular segment by confocal IVM revealed enhanced and faster neutrophil TEM across ATG5-compromised EC junctions. Autophagy-deficient EC contacts also acted as hotspot regions of exaggerated paracellular neutrophil TEM, and compromised EC autophagy supported increased neutrophil transcellular TEM. The overall impact of these cellular behaviors was increased infiltration of neutrophils into inflamed tissues, a finding recapitulated with several inflammatory stimuli, in a diverse range of tissues, and noted in the context of multiple leukocyte subtypes. Since excessive neutrophil extravasation in EC ATG5-deficient tissues was associated with enhanced tissue damage, and neutrophil trafficking was suppressed by local pharmacological induction of EC autophagy, the findings present activation of EC autophagy as a potential anti-inflammatory strategy. Hypothesizing that autophagy may influence the expression of TEM-promoting molecules, we observed that EC ATG5 deficiency caused the accumulation of EC junctional adhesion molecules and the formation of thickened junctional regions. Ultrastructural analysis of inflamed venules by CLEM revealed PECAM-1+ enlarged cell-cell contact sites and sheet-like plasma membrane flaps at ATG5-deficient EC junctions. Such aberrant structures could provide junctional sites with markedly accessible adhesion molecules, as indicated by the abrogation of neutrophil extravasation following pharmacological blockade of PECAM-1 in EC ATG5-deficient tissues. In addition to junctional proteins, increased cell-surface protein expression of a wide range of adhesion molecules on ATG5-deficient ECs suggested a broader role for EC autophagy in the regulation of leukocyte trafficking machinery. This did not appear to be transcriptionally regulated, but we detected EC surface PECAM-1, and potentially VE-cadherin, to traffic in LC3+ vesicular compartments and be degraded in an ATG5-dependent manner in stimulated ECs. Suggesting defective junctional protein degradation and turnover in autophagy impaired ECs, these findings are in agreement with the targeting of junctional components by autophagy mechanisms reported in other cell types (Bejarano et al., 2012; Nighot et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2014). Regulated by a plethora of post-translational modifications, including phosphorylation and ubiquitination, vesicular trafficking of EC junctional components dictates their cellular localization and functional properties (Majolée et al., 2019; Wessel et al., 2014). Notably, both phosphorylation and ubiquitination act as molecular signals that can target specific pools of proteins to autophagic compartments (Bejarano et al., 2012; Levine and Kroemer, 2019). It is therefore plausible that EC autophagy impairment leads to an accumulation of modified junctional adhesion molecules with altered signaling properties that may recycle back to plasma membrane domains and influence the architecture of cell-cell contacts. Furthermore, as autophagy is regulated by molecular components of leukocyte diapedesis, such as connexins and caveolin-1 (Bejarano et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2020), EC autophagy processes and junctional adhesion molecules may be reciprocally regulated. EC molecules are known to distribute to a variety of junctionally connected compartments or vesicles (Reglero-Real et al., 2012; Fernandez-Martin et al., 2012). Such mechanisms contribute to maintaining the integrity of the endothelium or provide additional membranous pools that surround leukocytes as they pass across ECs. In addition to canonical autophagy, ATG5 can regulate other membrane-trafficking pathways, notably the non-canonical form of autophagy LAP that requires the WD40 domain of ATG16L1. Here, we discovered that a LAP-like pathway controlled EC LC3 puncta formation and PECAM-1 expression at EC borders of inflamed tissues, findings that report on a previously unidentified molecular trafficking mechanism in ECs. Initially described in macrophages and acting as an immunosuppressive mechanism, LAP plays an important role in the phagocytosis and clearance of pathogens and apoptotic or dead cells (Florey et al., 2011; Huang et al., 2009; Martinez et al., 2011). During this process, phagocytic vacuoles become decorated by lipidated LC3 for rapid targeting to and degradation by the lysosome. In contrast to canonical autophagy, LAP activation requires the engagement of plasma membrane receptors (e.g., Toll-like receptors [TLRs], immunoglobulin receptors) by extracellular cargo and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in neutrophils and macrophages is mediated by the NADPH oxidase enzyme NOX2 (Heckmann et al., 2017). ECs similarly signal through TLR-4 when exposed to LPS (Tauseef et al., 2012) and generate NOX-dependent ROS following numerous inflammatory triggers (e.g., IR injury) (Frey et al., 2009). Since the latter phenomenon can regulate junctional destabilization (Nourshargh et al., 2010), the involvement of an EC LAP-like pathway in vascular junction dynamics in endotoxemia- and IR-driven acute inflammatory models is highly plausible. Finally, although speculative, the activation of a LAP-like pathway at EC contacts may be triggered by plasma membrane stretching and remodeling during neutrophil diapedesis. This response is analogous to the functional role of LAP in membrane repair following plasma and phagosomal membrane stress and damage induced by fungal pathogens (Westman et al., 2019). Our results suggest that a LAP-like non-canonical autophagy pathway in ECs orchestrates the degradation of internalized adhesion receptors present in vesicular compartments in a similar manner to targeting of phagosomal cargo-associated membranes in immune cells (Sanjuan et al., 2007). In addition, the WD40 domain of ATG16L1 may play a role in the internalization and signaling of EC adhesion molecules, as recently reported for cytokine receptors (Serramito-Gómez et al., 2020). Illustrated in mice deficient in the EC ATG16L1 WD40 domain, we identified the functional consequence of EC non-canonical autophagy deficiency as exaggerated neutrophil trafficking, a phenotype that recapitulated the results observed in EC ATG5-deficient animals. Importantly, these data suggest a role for derailed EC non-canonical autophagy signaling in the pathogenesis of inflammatory disorders linked to Atg5 gene polymorphisms or to the deficiency of other core autophagy genes (Sachdev and Lotze, 2017). As such, it is crucial to revisit the well-established associations of autophagy with immune disorders, commonly aligned with canonical autophagy, to links with forms of non-canonical autophagy, such as LAP. Consistent with this notion, LAP deficiency in mice includes the establishment of lupus-like autoimmune disease (Martinez et al., 2016), a syndrome that has been linked to Atg5 gene mutations in humans (Bentham et al., 2015). In summary, this work identifies EC autophagy as a non-redundant negative modulator of leukocyte breaching of venular walls. Such a mechanism may prevent acute leukocyte-mediated tissue damage and hence suppress the potential onset of chronic inflammation. Mechanistically, we aligned this with the regulation of cell surface adhesion molecules and remodeling of EC contacts through the autophagic machinery. The involvement of a LAP-like non-canonical autophagy pathway in this context reveals a previously unidentified molecular trafficking mechanism operating in ECs. Our results suggest that the formation of aberrant EC junctions, with a high capacity for supporting leukocyte TEM, could act as a causal link between autophagy dysregulation and the development of numerous inflammatory conditions and aging-associated pathologies.

Limitations of study

While EC autophagy is identified as a negative modulator of neutrophil trafficking in multiple inflammatory models, the dynamics of neutrophil TEM were only analyzed in inflamed murine cremaster muscle microcirculation. Determining whether EC autophagy machinery regulates neutrophil TEM in other vascular beds, similarly operates in males and females, and contributes to the diapedesis of different leukocyte subtypes will be critical goals. Moreover, since following acute inflammation, EC autophagy deficiency elicits enhanced tissue damage, investigating the potential progression of this to chronic disease would be informative. Similarly, extending the findings to aging-associated pathologies that have been linked to autophagic deficiency will be an important avenue. Finally, having identified a functional role for non-canonical autophagy in ECs, the associated mechanisms require in-depth analysis. This includes defining the ultrastructure and nature of LC3+ puncta in inflamed ECs, as well as the molecular mechanisms targeting leukocyte trafficking machinery to this degradative pathway.

STAR★Methods

Key resources table

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Sussan Nourshargh (s.nourshargh@qmul.ac.uk).

Materials availability

The supply of the following reagents and mice are subject to MTA agreements with the academics indicated in parenthesis: GFP-Map1lc3 mice and Atg5 mice (Prof. Noboru Mizushima); Cdh5-cre;Atg5 mice (Dr. Chantal Boulanger); Cdh5-creER mice (Prof. Yoshiaki Kubota); Atg16L1 mice (Prof. Tom Wileman).

Experimental model and subject details

Mice

All mice were on a C57BL/6 background with the exception of Atg16l1 mice, which were on a mixed sv129 and C57BL/6 background. All animal procedures were performed using 8-12-week-old mice (age and sex matched groups) in accordance with the institutional Animal Welfare Ethical Review Body (AWERB) and UK Home Office guidelines. For some experiments, mice were starved for 24 h with access to water ad libitum. GFP-Map1lc3 mice were provided by Prof. Mizushima (RIKEN BRC through the National Bio-Resource Project of the MEXT, Japan) (Mizushima et al., 2004). Mice constitutively deficient in EC Atg5 were obtained by crossing Cdh5-cre transgenic mice with Atg5 mice provided by Prof. N. Mizushima (Hara et al., 2006) to create Cdh5-cre;Atg5 mice (Vion et al., 2017). In order to assess the deletion efficiency of the Cdh5-cre transgene, Cdh5-cre;Atg5 were intercrossed with Rosa26 reporter mice (Rosa26) (Jackson Laboratory, Stock No: 007905) resulting in Cdh5-cre;Atg5;Rosa26 (referred to as Atg5 in main text) progeny. This mouse line exhibited genetically mosaic populations of ECs comprised of tdTomato+ ATG5 null ECs (Atg, referred to as Atg ECs in the main text) neighboring tdTomato-, ATG5 expressing ECs (Atg5, referred to as WT ECs in the main text). Atg5 mice showed normal circulating leukocyte numbers compared to their littermate controls. Specifically, male Atg5 and Atg5 mice exhibited 1790 and 1540 neutrophils/μl blood, respectively (p > 0.7). Additionally, male Atg5 and Atg5 mice exhibited 7070 and 7055 lymphocytes/μl blood (p > 0.9), 190 and 95 monocytes/μl blood (p > 0.4), 150 and 105 eosinophils/μl blood (p > 0.15) and 10 and 5 basophils/μl blood (p > 0.3), respectively. Because all constitutive EC-Cre deleters are known to be expressed in the embryonic haemogenic endothelium, which thus gives rise to recombined floxed alleles in ECs and hematopoietic lineages, we generated bone marrow chimeric mice (see below) to eliminate any potential impact of myeloid cell Atg5 deficiency on our experimental readouts. Thus, Lyz2-EGFP genetically targeted mice were used as donors for the generation of bone marrow chimeras and were kindly provided by Dr Markus Sperandio (Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Germany), used with the permission of Dr Thomas Graf (Center for Genomic Regulation and ICREA, Spain). Atg5 and Atg5 chimeric animals showed similar peripheral blood neutrophil counts (males: 1271 and 1073 neutrophils/ul of blood (p > 0.4); females: 1273 and 1055 neutrophils/ul of blood (p > 0.4), respectively) and equivalent reconstitution amounts of EGFP+ neutrophils (> 95%). Mice with inducible deletion Atg5 in ECs (Atg5) were obtained by intercrossing the Cdh5-creER mouse line (Cdh5(BAC)-creER; Rosa26) (Okabe et al., 2014) with Atg5 mice. 8 days prior to tissue harvesting, Atg5 mice and Atg5 littermate controls were subjected to intragastric administration of 100 mL Tamoxifen in corn oil (20 mg/ml) for 2 consecutive days. In Atg5 mice, the latter resulted in > 90% recombination of the Rosa allele as determined by tdTomato expression in the cremaster muscle microcirculation, and a ∼70% reduction in ATG5 protein and LC3 puncta in lung and cremaster ECs, respectively. Atg5 and Atg5 mice showed comparable peripheral blood neutrophil counts after Tamoxifen treatment (1003 and 1112 neutrophils/ul of blood, respectively (p > 0.6)). Homozygous Atg16l1 mice (referred to as Atg16l1 in the main text), lacking the WD and linker domain of ATG16L1 (Rai et al., 2019), were provided by Dr Tom Wileman. Atg16l1 mice showed normal circulating leukocyte numbers compared to their littermate controls. Specifically, Atg16l1 and WT mice exhibited 2450 and 1170 neutrophils/μl blood, respectively (p > 0.4). Additionally, male Atg16l1 and WT mice exhibited 7287 and 7090 lymphocytes/μl blood, 187 and 95 monocytes/μl blood, 193 and 220 eosinophils/μl blood and 10 and 10 basophils/μl blood, respectively (p > 0.3).

Cell culture

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) isolated from pooled donors (Promocell, Heidelberg, Germany) were grown in M199 (GIBCO-BRL, Grand Island, NY) with 20% fetal calf serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT), 10 U/ml heparin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and 30 μg/ml endothelial cell growth supplement (Sigma). All cells were incubated in plates pre-coated with 1% pig skin gelatin (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air.

Method details

Generation of bone marrow chimeric mice

Mice exhibiting ATG5-deficiency in ECs and littermate control chimeras were generated by transferring bone marrow cells from Lyz2-EGFP genetically targeted mice into Atg5 and Atg5 mice respectively. To establish the effect of LAP deficiency in ECs, mice exhibiting LAP sufficiency specifically in the hematopoietic system were established by transferring bone marrow cells from Lyz2-EGFP genetically targeted mice into Atg16l1 recipients. For the generation of bone marrow chimeras, 6-8-week-old recipient mice were lethally irradiated with two doses of 5 Gy of ionizing radiation 4 h apart. After 24 h, these mice were intravenously (i.v.) injected with 1.5 × 106 donor cells and reconstitution of neutrophil pools was assessed 4 weeks later by flow cytometry. Validation experiments confirmed that Atg5 chimeras and Atg16l1 chimeras showed normal circulating neutrophil numbers compared to their littermate control chimeras. Specifically, female Atg5 and Atg5 mice exhibited 1055 and 1273 neutrophils/μl blood, respectively. Male Atg5 and Atg5 mice exhibited 1073 and 1271 neutrophils/μl blood, respectively. Finally, male Atg16l1 and WT mice showed 1511 and 1677 neutrophils/μl blood, respectively (p > 0.5, n = 6-52 mice per group).

Inflammatory responses in the cremaster muscle

Mice were anaesthetized with 3% isoflurane and cremasteric ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury was induced by placing an orthodontic elastic band (1/8’’) around the anterior aspect of the testis (40 min) followed by removal of the band, intrascrotal (i.s.) injection of AF-conjugated non-blocking anti-PECAM-1 mAb (4 μg in 400 μL PBS) and initiation of the reperfusion phase (4h unless otherwise specified). Control sham mice underwent placement of the orthodontic band around the testis followed by its immediate removal. For some experiments, anti-PECAM-1 blocking mAb (1 mg/kg) or an isotype control mAb were injected i.v. 30 min prior to the induction of ischemia. In other experiments, mice were subjected to cremasteric IR injury and two hours prior to culling, were injected i.v. with Crimson (625-645) 20 nm microspheres (0.8 μl/g body weight) and non-blocking anti-PECAM-1 mAb to assess vascular permeability and label the vasculature, respectively. Alternatively, mice were subjected to sham or cremasteric IR injury and 3 μg of scrambled control or Tat-Beclin 1 peptide were locally injected (i.s.) together with non-blocking anti-PECAM-1 mAb at 0h or 2 h post-reperfusion, and tissues were harvested 2 h later for analysis. These doses had no impact on local neutrophil extravasation at baseline (Figure 2H). Furthermore, no increase in LC3 puncta was observed in the ear skin vasculature in scrambled versus Tat-Beclin 1 treated animals (0.2 versus 0.18 puncta / um2 EC x 104; respectively), showing that the autophagy-inducing peptide elicited a localized effect and did not impact EC autophagy in distant vascular beds. Alternatively, anaesthetized mice were locally injected (i.s.) with LPS (Sigma-Aldrich, 300 ng in 400 μL PBS) or PBS together with fluorescently conjugated non-blocking anti-PECAM-1 mAbs i.s. for 4 h. At the end of experiments, mice were culled by Schedule one method (cervical dislocation) and tissues were collected for IF staining. To induce apoptosis, mice were anaesthetized with 3% isoflurane and injected locally (i.s.) with Staurosporine (Abcam, 1 μM in 400 μL PBS) together with fluorescently conjugated non-blocking anti-PECAM-1 mAb for 4 h.

Cell transfection

Plasmid and siRNA transfections were performed by nucleofection (Nucleofector II, program U-001; Amaxa Biosystems, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) using 2-10 μg DNA or 250 pmol of siRNA.

Immunofluorescence staining

Cremaster muscles were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h at 4°C and permeabilized and blocked in PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) and 25% fetal calf serum (FCS, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 4 h at room temperature. Subsequently, the tissues were incubated with fluorescently labeled primary antibodies in PBS containing 10% FCS over night at 4°C. For in vitro imaging, HUVECs were seeded on #1.5 thickness coverslips (0.17 mm) (VWR) and/or polymer coverslip bottom dishes (Ibidi) and grown to confluence. Next, unstimulated or LPS-treated (1 μg/ml for 4 h) HUVECs were fixed with 4% PFA for 20 min, permeabilized for 5 min with PBS containing 0.2% Triton X-100 at room temperature, blocked with PBS containing 3% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min and incubated at 4°C with primary antibodies over-night. After extensive washes, cells were incubated with appropriate fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies.

Confocal image acquisition of fixed samples

Leica TCS SP8 and Zeiss LSM800 laser scanning confocal microscopes were used to capture serial optical z sections of cultured HUVECs and postcapillary venules and arterioles (diameter 20-45 μm) in immunostained whole-mounted cremaster muscles. Images were acquired with 20x/1.0 water, 40x/1.3 oil or 63x/1.4 oil objective lenses, with a 0.07-0.62 μm pixel size and 0.23-1.0 μm voxel depth as required. Where colocalization analyses were required, all channels were acquired sequentially and pinhole diameter was adjusted to retain optical section thickness of 555 ± 62 nm.

Confocal super-resolution imaging

Fixed HUVECs overexpressing GFP-LC3 were imaged with an inverted Nikon CSU-W1 SoRa spinning disk confocal microscope, equipped with a 100x/1.35 silicon objective lens and Prime 95B sCMOS camera (Photometrics). Images were acquired with the SoRa disk and appropriate magnifier to produce an effective pixel size of 0.04 μm. Serial z stacks were captured with a 0.15-1.0 μm interval and subsequently deconvolved with a maximum likelihood estimation method.

Correlative light electron microscopy

Region of interest (ROI) targeting

The tissue was carefully removed from the glass slide in phosphate buffer (PB) and immediately fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 4% paraformaldehyde in PB for 1h. The sample was then post-fixed and stained in a Pelco BioWave Pro+ microwave (Ted Pella) using an adapted version of the NCMIR protocol (Deerinck et al., 2010). Briefly, the tissue was post-fixed in 2% osmium tetroxide and 1.5% potassium ferricyanide, incubated in 1% thiocarbohydrazide, followed by 2% osmium tetroxide. Osmicated tissue was then stained en bloc with 1% uranyl, followed by Walton’s lead aspartate at 60°C. It was then dehydrated with a graded ethanol series, flat-embedded in Durcupan ACM® resin, and polymerized at 60°C. Position of the ROI was identified in the embedded tissue by X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) using an XRadia 510 Versa (Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy) guided by tissue shape and venules as landmarks. The tissue was trimmed to the area that includes the landmarks and was mounted onto an aluminum pin using conductive epoxy glue (ITW Chemtronics). A second micro-CT scan was performed and the tissue was trimmed around the ROI. The final SBF-SEM block was micro-CT scanned at 1.03 μm/pixel resolution which revealed cell nuclei. tdTomato signal of the 63 × tile scan stack was matched to the tomographic slices using the Fiji plugin BigWarp (Bogovic et al., 2016) based on nuclei positions as landmarks. Positions of the Atg5 cells were identified on the block face and depth of the tissue was estimated from the tomographic slices to target for SBF-SEM. All micro-CT data were handled in the 3dmod program of the IMOD software package (Kremer et al., 1996).

Serial block face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM)

Prior to SBF-SEM, the block was sputter-coated with 5–10 nm platinum using a Q150R S sputter coater (Quorum Technologies). SBF-SEM data was collected using a 3View2XP (Gatan Inc.) attached to a Sigma VP SEM (Zeiss). The microscope was operated at 1.8kV with 30-μm aperture, using Focal Charge Compensation mode (Deerinck et al., 2018). Inverted backscattered electron images were acquired every 50 nm, at a resolution of 8.44 nm/pixel. Acquired images were imported into Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012) and aligned using the Register Virtual Stack Slices (Arganda-Carreras et al., 2006) and in TrakEM2 using manual landmarks (Cardona et al., 2012). 63 × Z stack was matched to the aligned SBF-SEM data using BigWarp (Bogovic et al., 2016) based on nuclei positions and overlaid to the EM data after applying thin-plate spline transformation. Cells in the region of expanded cell-cell contacts were selected and segmented using the TrakEM2. Cell-cell contacts were segmented if the plasma membranes of two neighboring cells were closely apposed with spacing less than or equal to 25 nm based on the length of homo dimer of PECAM extracellular domains (Jiang et al., 2016). 3D reconstructions were made in the 3dmod program.

Confocal intravital microscopy (IVM)

The mode and dynamics of neutrophil migration through blood vessel walls was analyzed by confocal IVM as described previously (Woodfin et al., 2011). In order to analyze neutrophil interactions with ECs, chimeric Cdh5-cre;Atg5;Rosa26 male mice were injected i.s. with an AF-647 labeled non-blocking anti-PECAM-1 mAb to stain EC junctions. 2 h after i.s. injection, mice were anaesthetized by intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg) and cremaster muscles were exteriorized and pinned out flat over the optical window of a heated custom-built microscope stage. Animals were maintained at 37°C and cremaster muscles were perfused with warm Tyrode’s solution (Sigma-Aldrich) throughout the experiment. 2 h after i.s. injection, mice were subjected to IR injury by placing a clamp at the base of the exteriorized tissue for 40 min to induce ischemia, after which the clamp was removed to allow reperfusion over a 2 h period. Control sham operated mice underwent identical surgical procedures but without inducing tissue IR. For some experiments, anaesthetized mice received an i.s. injection of fluorescently labeled anti-PECAM-1 mAb alone or co-injected with LPS (300 ng) to label blood vessels and/or induce an inflammatory response, respectively. Alternatively, exteriorised cremaster muscle tissues of sham or IR-treated mice were incubated with 2 μM propidium iodide during 5 minutes prior to imaging acquisition. Postcapillary venules (20-45 μm diameter) of flat mounted cremaster muscles were imaged every 60 s for 0.5-2.0 h using an upright Leica SP5 confocal laser scanning microscope equipped with a 20x/1.0 water-dipping objective lens and 8 kHz resonant scanner. Resultant time-lapse z stack images were assembled offline into 3D videos using Imaris software. The x × y × z dimensions of the recorded area were typically 300 × 130 × 35 μm and the resulting voxel size was 0.29 × 0.29 × 0.69 μm.

Time-lapse fluorescence imaging

HUVECs expressing GFP-LC3 were seeded onto 8 well μ-slides (Ibidi) and grown for 24-48 h. Cells were then stimulated with LPS (1 μg/ml) for 4 h and AF-Fluor 555 non-blocking anti-PECAM-1 mAb (2 μg/ml) was added for 5-15 min prior to imaging using an inverted Zeiss LSM800 confocal laser scanning microscope. Cells were imaged at 30 s intervals for a maximum of 1 h in growth medium containing 20 mM HEPES, in a heated chamber at 37°C. Images were analyzed using Imaris software.

In vitro neutrophil TEM assay

TEM of human neutrophils through HUVECs was quantified as previously reported (Muller and Luscinskas, 2008; Muller et al., 1993). Briefly, HUVEC monolayers grown to confluence on hydrated collagen gels were treated for 4 h with bafilomycin A1 (100 nM) or diluent control in complete culture media (Medium 199 + 20% heat-inactivated adult human serum). Neutrophils, collected from healthy adult donors, were isolated by density gradient centrifugation at room temperature without red blood cell (RBC) lysis. HUVEC monolayers were washed 3 times in Medium 199 + 0.1% human serum albumin. Neutrophils were resuspended to 1 × 106 per ml in the same medium containing 20 μg/ml rabbit anti-PECAM IgG or preimmune IgG from the same rabbit. The cells were allowed to transmigrate for 2.5 minutes, washed in saline and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin prior to staining and quantitation of TEM.

Peritoneal inflammation

Peritonitis was induced during 4h (unless otherwise indicated) by i.p. injection of LPS (1 mg/kg), zymosan A (Sigma-Aldrich, 1 mg) or MDP (300 μg) in 500 μl of PBS, with control mice receiving PBS only. Mice were then culled and subjected to peritoneal lavage using 5 mL PBS containing 5 mM EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.25% BSA. The resultant peritoneal exudates were immunostained with fluorescently labeled primary antibodies targeting proteins of interest to quantify the total numbers of infiltrating neutrophils by flow cytometry (Live CD45+CD11b+SiglecF-Ly6G+F4/80-), monocytes (Live CD45+CD11b+SiglecF-Ly6G-Ly6ChiF4/80low) and eosinophils (Live CD45+CD11b+SiglecF+), per peritoneal cavity.

Cutaneous inflammation

LPS (300 ng in 50 μl PBS, IL1β [R&D], 50 ng in 50 μl PBS) or PBS alone were injected intradermally into shaved dorsal skin of chimeric mice. After 4 h, skin samples were dissected, frozen in liquid nitrogen and homogenized in homogenization buffer (600 mM NaCl, 0.5% HTAB buffer, 600 mM KH2PO4, 66 mM Na2HPO4) using a Precellys-24 tissue homogenizer (Bertin Technologies). Tissue debris was removed by centrifugation and the supernatants assayed for peroxidase activity, determined by adding the MPO substrate 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (Invitrogen) and measuring optical absorbance at 650 nm at 1 min intervals over 20 min using a Spectra MR microplate spectrophotometer (Dynex Technologies). MPO activity (used as a readout for neutrophil tissue infiltration) was expressed as the increase in optical density per min multiplied by 10.

Mouse lung endothelial cell (MLEC) isolation

Lungs from Cdh5-cre;Atg5;Rosa26 control mice or mice subjected to a model of endotoxemia (i.p. injection of LPS from Escherichia coli [6 mg/kg, Sigma-Aldrich] and Peptidoglycan G from Staphylococcus aureus [1 mg/kg, Sigma-Aldrich] [LPS + PG]), were digested in 0.1% type I collagenase (GIBCO) for 40 min at 37°C. Homogenates were passed through an 18G needle followed by centrifugation, and RBC lysis of the pellet using ACK lysis buffer (150 mM NH3Cl, 1 mM KHCO3 and 1 mM EDTA) at room temperature for 5 min. Samples were then filtered and washed before immunostaining and cell sorting as detailed below.

Flow cytometry and cell sorting

Where required, blood samples were treated with ACK lysis buffer. All samples were incubated with anti CD16/-CD32 antibodies (Becton Dickinson) to block Fc-receptors and stained with fluorescently labeled primary antibodies of interest. The samples were analyzed on an LSR Fortessa flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) and FlowJo software (TreeStar). Total cell counts were determined using fluorescent counting beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Freshly isolated MLECs from Cdh5-cre;Atg5;Rosa26 mice were sorted on a BD FACSAria II cell sorter as CD45-PECAM-1+CD102+tdTomato- (WT ECs) and CD45-PECAM-1+CD102+tdTomato+ (Atg5−/− ECs).

Real Time qRT-PCR analysis

Total RNA was purified from isolated MLECs using the RNeasy micro kit (QIAGEN) and reverse transcribed into cDNA with the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad). Quantitative real-time PCR was carried out using the iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad or Thermofisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, primers for Pecam-1, Cdh5, Icam-1, Icam-2, Vcam-1, E-selectin, Cxcl1, TnfRI, TnfRII Atg5, TdtTomato and Gapdh (Integrated DNA Techonologies) and the 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). All transcript were quantified relative to Gapdh.

Remote organ vascular leakage quantification

In some experiments, remote organ vascular permeability was quantified by accumulation of the plasma protein tracer Evans Blue (EB, Sigma-Aldrich). Here, filtered 1% Evans Blue solution was injected i.v. (5 μl/g body weight) 30 mins prior to sacrifice by exsanguination followed by a whole-body vascular washout using 10 mL PBS. Lungs were collected and tissue accumulated dye was quantified by eluting in 300 μl of formamide for 18 h at 56°C. Optical density (OD) readings were taken at 620 nm nm and used as a measure of vascular leakage.

Cell surface biotinylation assays

Cultured HUVECs were stimulated with LPS (1 μg/ml) for 4 h prior to labeling cell surface-associated proteins with EZ-Link sulfo-NHS-biotin (Thermo Scientific). Briefly, HUVEC monolayers plated on 60 mm dishes were incubated with a solution of 0.1 mg/ml of sulfo-NHS-biotin in PBS supplemented with 1.5 mM Ca2+ for 30 min at 4°C to block membrane trafficking events such as internalisation of cell surface proteins, during the biotinylation reaction. Excess sulfo-NHS-biotin was then removed by washing with cold PBS supplemented with 1.5 mM Ca2+ and cells were incubated with cold DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS to quench any remaining free reagent. Following another wash, cells were either directly lysed in situ or, for pulse-chase experiments, cultured at 37°C for the indicated times and then lysed as above. Lysates were prepared by passing cell homogenates through a 0.6 mm, 24G needle and then centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 5 min to pellet insoluble debris. Part of the supernatant was conserved as total lysate followed by pull-down of biotinylated proteins with NeutrAvidin agarose (Thermo Scientific).

Immunoblotting

Cell lysates were prepared in 2X Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche) and denatured at 95°C for 5 min. Samples were run on 10 or 15% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred onto PVDF membranes (GE Healthcare) using standard techniques. Immunoblots were blocked in PBS containing 5% non-fat milk and 0.1% Tween 20 at room temperature for 1 h and then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. After extensive washes, immunoblots were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Dako), and proteins were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Radiance Plus, Azure) acquired on Azure Biosystems Imaging System (Cambridge Bioscience).

Quantification and statistical analysis

Quantification of confocal IVM videos

Models of longitudinal half vessel projections were generated to unequivocally identify individual neutrophils migrating through the different compartments of the venular walls. Different modes of neutrophil TEM (paracellular and transcellular) and their dynamics were determined by manual tracking of individual neutrophils using Imaris software. Luminal neutrophils were defined as adherent when they remained stationary on the endothelium for at least 60 s. Neutrophil TEM was defined as an event where neutrophils fully migrated through ECs in a luminal-to-abluminal direction. The duration of TEM events was calculated as the time between the image frame in which the neutrophil was first observed to disrupt immunolabelled PECAM-1 regions of ECs up to the image frame in which the neutrophil had fully traversed the EC barrier. Paracellular and transcellular TEM were defined as the percentage of total TEM events whereby neutrophils migrated through EC junctions or directly through the EC body, respectively. TEM through “hot spots” was defined as any instance where 2 or more neutrophils were observed migrating through the same EC pore/junction. Frequency of such ‘hotspot’ TEM events was quantified as the percentage of total TEM events observed in each experiment. The number of PECAM-1 pores was quantified by manually counting the total number of single PECAM-1 immunolabeled pores that were observed throughout the entire imaging acquisition period. The duration of PECAM-1 pore ‘opening time’ was defined as the time between the first image frame in which PECAM-1 labeling was disrupted to the image frame in which the pore fully closed. Of note, PECAM-1 pores that remained open throughout the total experimental time frame were excluded from this analysis.

Image quantification of postcapillary venules in fixed cremaster muscle

Image stacks of longitudinal half vessels were reconstructed in 3D and analyzed using Imaris software (Bitplane). ECs exhibiting GFP-LC3 puncta were quantified as cells presenting at least one GFP-LC3-positive punctum. Individual ECs and neutrophils in the field of view were counted manually and data expressed as percentage of cells expressing puncta. The number of puncta per unit area of EC was quantified using the Imaris software ‘spots function’ (the ‘estimated diameter’ function for identifying puncta was set to 0.5 μm), and was normalized to the total surface area of individual ECs based on the ‘isosurfaces’ masking of PECAM-1 positive areas (i.e., PECAM-1high junctional and PECAM-1low non-junctional regions). Extravasated neutrophils per field of view (330 × 160 × 45 μm) were defined as those that had fully transmigrated through both the EC and pericyte layers, identified by characteristic morphological changes to the neutrophil cell body, and were quantified from 8-10 images per mouse. Thickened EC junctions defined as having a width of > 2 μm were determined using the measuring tool of Imaris software to specify EC-cell contact regions identified by PECAM-1 or VE-Cadherin immunostaining. The frequency of thickened junctions per EC was quantified based on the isosurface masks made on PECAM-1 positive areas (PECAM-1high junctional and PECAM-1low non-junctional regions). Fluorescence intensity line profiles along EC-cell contacts (as visualized by PECAM-1 or VE-Cadherin immunostaining) were determined using ImageJ software (NIH) and were used to quantify EC junction width (μm) and junctional molecule enrichment (fluorescence sum intensity) at cell-cell contact sites. 5-8 postcapillary venules were quantified per mouse.

Quantification of fixed HUVEC images

Images were smoothed with a Gaussian filter and background signal removed using the ImageJ ‘Background Subtraction’ function. Manual thresholding was carried out on each channel by visual inspection. Signal colocalization was quantified using the Manders colocalization coefficient, implemented using the ImageJ JACoP plugin (Bolte and Cordelières, 2006). Where biological control was not possible, the analysis was repeated after 90 rotational offset of one channel with respect to the other, providing an internal control (referred to as offset control in main text). The number of GFP-LC3 vesicles co-labeled with PECAM-1 and/or WIPI2 were determined using the ImageJ 3D Objects Counter plugin (Bolte and Cordelières, 2006).Following image pre-processing, binary ‘colocalization’ channels were derived from the intersection of the individual channel thresholds. Puncta with a minimum 50 voxel overlap were counted, in addition to the total GFP-LC3 puncta number.

Statistics

Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 8.0 software (GraphPad) and datasets expressed as mean ± SEM with n numbers of 3 or more biological replicates as detailed in Figure legends. Sample sizes were chosen on the basis of published work in which similar experiments had been reported. Comparisons between two groups were carried out using the paired or unpaired Student’s t test. One-way ANOVA or two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s or Bonferroni′s post hoc test were performed for multiple group comparisons. Statistical significance was accepted at p < 0.05.
REAGENT or RESOURCESOURCEIDENTIFIER
Antibodies

Anti-mouse PECAM-1 (clone 390)Thermo Fisher ScientificCat#16-0311-85; RRID: AB_468933
Blocking anti-mouse PECAM-1 (clone Mec12.3)BiolegendCat#102502; RRID: AB_312909
Anti-mouse IgG2a, κ isotype control (clone RTK2758)BiolegendCat#400502; RRID: AB_2736919
Anti-mouse CD102 (clone 3C4)BiolegendCat#105602; RRID: AB_313195
Anti-mouse CD45 (clone 30-F11)BiolegendCat#103102; RRID: AB_312967
Anti-mouse ICAM-1 (clone YN1)BiolegendCat#116102; RRID: AB_313693
Anti-mouse Ly6G (clone 18A)BiolegendCat#127602; RRID: AB_1089180
Anti-mouse MRP14 (clone 2B10)Gift from Dr N. Hogg (The Francis Crick Institute, UK) (Hobbs et al., 2003)N/A
Anti-mouse CD144 (clone BV14)Thermo Fisher ScientificCat#14-1442-82; RRID: AB_891369
Polyclonal anti-mouse GFPAbcamCat#ab6662; RRID: AB_305635
Anti-mouse JAM-C (clone 114.2)Gift from Dr M. Aurrand-Lions (INSERM, France) (Lamagna et al., 2005)N/A
Polyclonal anti-mouse LC3Thermo Fisher ScientificCat#PA1-16930; RRID: AB_2281384
Anti-mouse WIPI2Gift from Dr S. Tooze (The Francis Crick Institute, UK) (Dooley et al., 2014)N/A
Anti-mouse F4/80 (clone BM8)BiolegendCat#123102; RRID: AB_893506
Anti-mouse Ly6C (clone HK1.4)BiolegendCat#128002; RRID: AB_1134214
Anti-mouse SiglecF (clone S17007L)BiolegendCat#155502; RRID: AB_2810420
Anti-mouse CD11b (clone M1/70)BiolegendCat#1012020; RRID: AB_312785
Anti-mouse neutrophil (clone 7/4)AbcamCat#ab53453; RRID: AB_881408
Anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (CLONE 2.4G2)BDBiosciencesCat#553141; RRID: AB_394656
Anti-human PECAM-1 (clone WM59)Thermo Fisher ScientificCat#14-0319-82; RRID: AB_467204
Blocking anti-human PECAM-1Generated in the lab of Dr W. A. Muller (Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA) (Mamdouh et al., 2003)N/A
Polyclonal anti-human LC3Cell Signaling TechnologyCat#2775; RRID: AB_915950
Anti-human Atg5 (clone D5F5U)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat#12994; RRID: AB_2630393
Anti-human β-Actin (clone AC-15)Sigma-AldrichCat#A5441; RRID: AB_476744
Anti-human VE-Cadherin (F-8)Santa Cruz BiotechnologyCat#sc-9989 RRID: AB_2077957

Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins

LPSSigma-AldrichCat#A9543
Peptidoglican G from Staphylococcus aureusSigma-AldrichCat#77410-10mg
Zymosan ASigma-AldrichCat#Z4250
Muramydipeptide (MDP, L-D isomer, active)InvivoGenCat#tlrl-mdp
IL1βR&DCat#201-LB-010
M199 mediumGIBCO-BRLCat#11150059
DMEMGIBCO-BRLCat#21068028
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)Sigma-AldrichCat#F9665
HeparinSigma-AldrichCat#H3393
Endothelial Cell Growth Supplement (ECGS)Sigma-AldrichCat#E2759
Fetal Calf Serum (FCS)Thermo Fisher ScientificCat# 26010074
Paraformaldehyde (PFA)Sigma-AldrichCat#158127
EZ-Link Sulfo-NHS-BiotinThermo Fisher ScientificCat#21217
Pierce NeutrAvidin AgaroseThermo Fisher ScientificCat#29201
Triton X-100Sigma-AldrichCat#9002-93-1
Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA)Sigma-AldrichCat#A9543
Tyrode’s solutionSigma-AldrichCat#T1788
Bafilomycin A1AlfaAesar (Avocado Research Chemicals)Cat# J67193
Pig Skin GelatinSigma-AldrichCat#9000-70-8
EDTASigma-AldrichCat#EDS
Halt Protease and phosphatase inhibitorsThermo Fisher ScientificCat#78440
3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidineInvitrogenCat#N301
2X Laemmli Sample BufferBio-RadCat#1610737
Type I CollagenaseGIBCOCat#10114532
Tat-Beclin 1 D11 Autophagy Inducing Peptide - Retroinverso formBio-techneCat#NBP2-49888
Tat-Beclin 1 L11S Peptide - Scrambled ControlBio-techneCat#NBP2-49887
Propidium IodideSigma-AldrichCat#P4864

Critical commercial assays

Alexa Fluor 488 Antibody Labeling KitThermo Fisher ScientificCat#A20181
Alexa Fluor 555 Antibody Labeling KitThermo Fisher ScientificCat#A20187
Alexa Fluor 647 Antibody Labeling KitThermo Fisher ScientificCat#A20186
DyLight 405 antibody Labeling KitThermo Fisher ScientificCat#53021
Yellow Zombie Fixable Viability KitBiolegendCat#423103
RNeasy Micro KitQIAGENCat#74004
iScript cDNA Synthesis KitBio-RadCat#4106228
iQ SYBR Green SupermixBio-RadCat#1708880

Experimental models: Cell lines

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs)PromoCellCat#C-14008

Experimental models: Organisms/strains

Mouse, GFP-LC3TG/+Generated in the lab of Prof. N. Mizushima (RIKEN BRC through the National Bio-Resource Project of the MEXT, Japan) (Mizushima et al., 2004)N/A
Mouse, Cdh5-Cre; Atg5fl/flGenerated in the lab of Dr C.Boulanger (INSERM, France) (Vion et al., 2017)N/A
Mouse, Rosa26CAG-loxP-STOP-loxP-tdTomato/ CAG-loxP-STOP-loxP-tdTomatoThe Jackson LaboratoryJAX 007905
Mouse,Cdh5-CreERT2 (Cdh5(BAC)-CreERT2; Rosa26tdTomato/tdTomato)Generated in the lab of Prof. Y. Kubota (Keio University School of Medicine, Japan) (Okabe et al., 2014)N/A
Mouse, Lyz2-EGFP-kiGift from Dr M. Sperandio (Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Germany) (Faust et al., 2000)N/A
Mouse, Atg16l1E230/E230Generated in the lab of Prof T. Wileman (Quadram Institute, UK) (Rai et al., 2019)N/A

Oligonucleotides

Atg5 ON-TARGETplus siRNA SMARTpooL 5′-GGCAUUAUCCAAUUGGUUU-3′ 5′-GCAGAACCAUACUAUUUGC-3′, 5′-UGACAGAUUUGACCAGUUU-3′ 5′-ACAAAGAUGUGCUUCGAGA-3′Dharmacon Inc; Horizon DiscoveryCat# L-004374-00-0005
Luciferase ON-TARGETplus siRNA 5′-CGUACGCGGAAUACUUCGA-3′Dharmacon Inc; Horizon DiscoveryCat#D-002050-01-20
Real-time PCR primer: Gapdh Forward 5′- TCGTGGATCTGACGTGCCGCCTG-3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: Gapdh Reverse 5′- CACCACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCGTA-3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: Pecam-1 Forward 5′- AGGTGGAACAAGCACAGATG-3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: Pecam-1 Reverse 5′- TTGCTGATGGCACCATCTTC-3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: Cdh5 Forward 5′-CAGCCCAAAGTGTGTGAGAA-3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: Cdh5 Reverse 5′- GAACTTCACGTTTCGTGGTG-3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: Atg5 Forward 5′- GCAGTAGGCTTGAGTGAACT-3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: Atg5 Reverse 5′- CTAGGGCATTGTAGGCTTGA-3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: TdTomato Forward 5′- CAAGCTGGACCATCACCTCC-3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: TdTomato Reverse 5′- TGCCCGTACAGGAACAGGTG-3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: E-selectin Forward 5′- AGCTACCCATGGAACACGAC −3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: E-selectin Reverse 5′- ACGCAAGTTCTCCAGCTGTT-3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: Icam-1 Forward 5′- GTGCAATCATGGTTCAGTGC −3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: Icam-1 Reverse 5′- GTGTGGTGTTGTGAGCCTAT −3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: Icam-2 Forward 5′- ATCAACTGCAGCACCAACTG −3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: Icam-2 Reverse 5′- ACTTGAGCTGGAGGCTGGTA-3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: Vcam-1 Forward 5′- TCTTGGGAGCCTCAACGGTA −3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: Vcam-1 Reverse 5′- CAAGTGAGGGCCATGGAGTC −3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: Cxcl1 Forward 5′- CCGAAGTCATAGCCACACTCAA −3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: Cxcl1 Reverse 5′- GCAGTCTGTCTTCTTTCTCCGTTA −3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: TnfRI Forward 5′- CAGTCTGCAGGGAGTGTGAA-3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: TnfRI Reverse 5′- CACGCACTGGAAGTGTGTCT −3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: TnfRII Forward 5′- TACCAAGGGTGGCATCTCTC-3′This paperN/A
Real-time PCR primer: TnfRII Reverse 5′- TCCTGGGATTTCTCATCAGG −3′This paperN/A

Recombinant DNA

pEGFP-LC3 plasmidGift from Dr T Yoshimori (Osaka University, Japan) (Kabeya et al., 2000)N/A

Software and algorithms

FlowJo v10.2Tree Starhttps://www.flowjo.com/
ImageJ v2.0NIHhttps://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
Imaris v9.2Bitplanehttps://imaris.oxinst.com/
Prism v8.4GraphPadhttps://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/
IMODUniversity of Coloradohttps://bio3d.colorado.edu/imod/

Other

123cound eBeads counting beadsThermo Fisher ScientificCat#01-1234-42
StaurosporineAbcamCat#120056
  76 in total

1.  Crosstalk between reticular adherens junctions and platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 regulates endothelial barrier function.

Authors:  Laura Fernández-Martín; Beatriz Marcos-Ramiro; Carolina L Bigarella; Mariona Graupera; Robert J Cain; Natalia Reglero-Real; Anaïs Jiménez; Eva Cernuda-Morollón; Isabel Correas; Susan Cox; Anne J Ridley; Jaime Millán
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 8.311

2.  Autophagy machinery mediates macroendocytic processing and entotic cell death by targeting single membranes.

Authors:  Oliver Florey; Sung Eun Kim; Cynthia P Sandoval; Cole M Haynes; Michael Overholtzer
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 3.  Biological Functions of Autophagy Genes: A Disease Perspective.

Authors:  Beth Levine; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Insertion of enhanced green fluorescent protein into the lysozyme gene creates mice with green fluorescent granulocytes and macrophages.

Authors:  N Faust; F Varas; L M Kelly; S Heck; T Graf
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Spatial and temporal profiles for anti-inflammatory gene expression in leukocytes during a resolving model of peritonitis.

Authors:  Amilcar S Damazo; Simon Yona; Roderick J Flower; Mauro Perretti; Sonia M Oliani
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  High-performance serial block-face SEM of nonconductive biological samples enabled by focal gas injection-based charge compensation.

Authors:  T J Deerinck; T M Shone; E A Bushong; R Ramachandra; S T Peltier; M H Ellisman
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 7.  Localized signals that regulate transendothelial migration.

Authors:  William A Muller
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 7.486

8.  Autophagy modulates dynamics of connexins at the plasma membrane in a ubiquitin-dependent manner.

Authors:  Eloy Bejarano; Henrique Girao; Andrea Yuste; Bindi Patel; Carla Marques; David C Spray; Paulo Pereira; Ana Maria Cuervo
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  TLR4 activation of TRPC6-dependent calcium signaling mediates endotoxin-induced lung vascular permeability and inflammation.

Authors:  Mohammad Tauseef; Nebojsa Knezevic; Koteswara R Chava; Monica Smith; Sukriti Sukriti; Nicholas Gianaris; Alexander G Obukhov; Stephen M Vogel; Dean E Schraufnagel; Alexander Dietrich; Lutz Birnbaumer; Asrar B Malik; Dolly Mehta
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Noncanonical autophagy inhibits the autoinflammatory, lupus-like response to dying cells.

Authors:  Jennifer Martinez; Larissa D Cunha; Sunmin Park; Mao Yang; Qun Lu; Robert Orchard; Quan-Zhen Li; Mei Yan; Laura Janke; Cliff Guy; Andreas Linkermann; Herbert W Virgin; Douglas R Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 69.504

View more
  9 in total

1.  Opinion: Endothelial Cells - Macrophage-Like Gatekeepers?

Authors:  Amanda J Stolarz; Shengyu Mu; Huiliang Zhang; Abdelrahman Y Fouda; Nancy J Rusch; Zufeng Ding
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 8.786

2.  Endothelial cell autophagy keeps neutrophil trafficking under control.

Authors:  Natalia Reglero-Real; Lorena Pérez-Gutiérrez; Sussan Nourshargh
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2021-10-31       Impact factor: 16.016

3.  Argonaute-2 protects the neurovascular unit from damage caused by systemic inflammation.

Authors:  Marta Machado-Pereira; Cláudia Saraiva; Liliana Bernardino; Ana C Cristóvão; Raquel Ferreira
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 8.322

4.  Variant Enrichment Analysis to Explore Pathways Functionality in Complex Autoinflammatory Skin Disorders through Whole Exome Sequencing Analysis.

Authors:  Lucas André Cavalcanti Brandão; Ronald Rodrigues de Moura; Angelo Valerio Marzano; Chiara Moltrasio; Paola Maura Tricarico; Sergio Crovella
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  The Induction of Endothelial Autophagy and Its Role in the Development of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Yunqing Hua; Jing Zhang; Qianqian Liu; Jing Su; Yun Zhao; Guobin Zheng; Zhihui Yang; Danping Zhuo; Chuanrui Ma; Guanwei Fan
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-23

Review 6.  Autophagy in gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  Bo-Zong Shao; Ning-Li Chai; Yi Yao; Jin-Ping Li; Helen Ka Wai Law; En-Qiang Linghu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 7.  Gq Signaling in Autophagy Control: Between Chemical and Mechanical Cues.

Authors:  Inmaculada Navarro-Lérida; Anna M Aragay; Alejandro Asensio; Catalina Ribas
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-18

Review 8.  Development of an autophagy activator from Class III PI3K complexes, Tat-BECN1 peptide: Mechanisms and applications.

Authors:  Yanfei He; Huaqing Lu; Yuting Zhao
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-09-12

9.  Knockout of GGPPS1 restrains rab37-mediated autophagy in response to ventilator-induced lung injury.

Authors:  Zexu Wang; Meizi Chen; Xia Pan; Li Wang; Cheng Yin; Qiuqi Lin; Jingjing Jiang; Yunlei Zhang; Bing Wan
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.374

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.