Literature DB >> 34363501

Impact of different visiting policies on family satisfaction in two Spanish ICUs before and during COVID-19.

Emilio Rodriguez-Ruiz1,2,3, Maitane Campelo-Izquierdo4, Ana Estany-Gestal5, Antonio Rodríguez-Núñez6,7,8, Jos M Latour9.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34363501      PMCID: PMC8349137          DOI: 10.1007/s00134-021-06485-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Engaging relatives in the care of critically ill patients is associated with better outcomes. This reflects the importance of family-centred care (FCC) to deliver high-quality care in intensive care units (ICUs) [1]. Restricted visiting in ICU during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) COVID-19 pandemic has left family members unable to visit their loved ones [2, 3]. In our cross-sectional study, designed to validate the EMpowerment of PAtients in THe Intensive Care-Family (EMPATHIC-F) questionnaire, we collected data in two Spanish ICUs between November 2019 and May 2020 [4]. Here, we report a secondary analysis demonstrating the impact of restricted visiting policies during COVID-19 on family satisfaction and providing evidence to support the ICU team to return, or change, to open visiting policies. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, visiting policies varied between the two ICUs. ICU-1 had restricted visiting of 1-h twice a day at mealtimes. ICU-2 had an open visiting policy, where relatives could stay with their next-of-kin most of the time except at night and during morning rounds. When Spain was hit by COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, visiting policies changed in both ICUs towards a restricted policy of 1-h a day and only one relative. Simultaneously, daily telephone updates and video calls made by intensivists and nurses were implemented. Despite these changes and in line with our study protocol, we continued data collection until May 2020. The primary outcome was family satisfaction measured by the validated EMPATHIC-F questionnaire and presented as median scores [4]. The detailed study methods are provided in electronic supplementary material (ESM-1). During the 6-month study period, 270 family members were recruited and 262 (97%) completed the EMPATHIC-F questionnaire. Family members reported higher satisfaction with care in ICU-2 (p = 0.010), particularly in the domains organization (p = 0.031) and care and treatment (p = 0.019) (Table 1). During COVID-19 pandemic visiting restrictions, median scores in the domain family participation were lower in both ICUs, and significantly lower in ICU-2 (5.83 vs. 5.67, p = 0.016) (ESM-2).
Table 1

Differences in EMPATHIC-F domains between two ICUs

DomainICU-1ICU-2p-value
nMedianIQR95% CINMedianIQR95% CI
Professional attitude1466.005.50–6.005.83–6.001166.005.66–6.005.83–6.000.306
Organization1465.805.20–6.005.60–6.001166.005.60–6.005.80–6.000.031
Care and Treatment1465.625.25–6.005.43–5.721165.855.37–6.005.75–6.000.019
Information1465.805.23–6.005.60–6.001166.005.40–6.005.80–6.000.101
Family participation1465.675.00–6.005.50–5.831165.805.33–6.005.67–5.830.126
Satisfaction total items1465.665.30–5.905.56–5.751165.825.53–5.965.73–5.870.010

Data are expressed as the median (interquartile range). p values calculated by Mann–Whitney U test. Statistically significant difference between groups: p < 0.05

IQR interquartile range, CI confidence interval, EMPATHIC-F empowerment of patients in the intensive care-family

Differences in EMPATHIC-F domains between two ICUs Data are expressed as the median (interquartile range). p values calculated by Mann–Whitney U test. Statistically significant difference between groups: p < 0.05 IQR interquartile range, CI confidence interval, EMPATHIC-F empowerment of patients in the intensive care-family Family-centred care has been defined as an approach to healthcare that is respectful of and responsive to individual families’ needs and values [1]. Using the EMPATHIC-F questionnaire covering five FCC domains (information, organization, care and treatment, professional attitude, and parent participation) [4], we observed that open visiting policies enhance family satisfaction. According to previous reports, COVID-19 pandemic has challenged FCC practices in ICUs [5]. We have demonstrated that this has impacted on family satisfaction in an ICU with open visiting and where family members actively participate in patients' care. Although strategies have been implemented to improve communication with relatives of ICU patients [5], we believe that under current circumstances (better knowledge of the disease, availability of resources, and increasing vaccination rates), ICUs should be reopened to families. Family satisfaction outcomes can support strategies to promptly return to FCC and open visiting. The sample size of our study was small, limiting the generalisability. Therefore, ICU staff need to assess their own FCC practices to ensure that temporary changes implemented during the pandemic do not undermine the role that families play in patient recovery. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file1 (PDF 233 KB)
  5 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for Family-Centered Care in the Neonatal, Pediatric, and Adult ICU.

Authors:  Judy E Davidson; Rebecca A Aslakson; Ann C Long; Kathleen A Puntillo; Erin K Kross; Joanna Hart; Christopher E Cox; Hannah Wunsch; Mary A Wickline; Mark E Nunnally; Giora Netzer; Nancy Kentish-Barnes; Charles L Sprung; Christiane S Hartog; Maureen Coombs; Rik T Gerritsen; Ramona O Hopkins; Linda S Franck; Yoanna Skrobik; Alexander A Kon; Elizabeth A Scruth; Maurene A Harvey; Mithya Lewis-Newby; Douglas B White; Sandra M Swoboda; Colin R Cooke; Mitchell M Levy; Elie Azoulay; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Ten reasons for focusing on the care we provide for family members of critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Élie Azoulay; J Randall Curtis; Nancy Kentish-Barnes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Measuring family-centred care practices in adult intensive care units: The EMPATHIC-F questionnaire.

Authors:  Emilio Rodríguez-Ruiz; Maitane Campelo-Izquierdo; Montserrat Mansilla Rodríguez; Ana Estany-Gestal; Andrés Blanco Hortas; María Sol Rodríguez-Calvo; Antonio Rodríguez-Núñez; Jos M Latour
Journal:  Nurs Crit Care       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 2.325

Review 4.  How the COVID-19 pandemic will change the future of critical care.

Authors:  Yaseen M Arabi; Elie Azoulay; Hasan M Al-Dorzi; Jason Phua; Jorge Salluh; Alexandra Binnie; Carol Hodgson; Derek C Angus; Maurizio Cecconi; Bin Du; Rob Fowler; Charles D Gomersall; Peter Horby; Nicole P Juffermans; Jozef Kesecioglu; Ruth M Kleinpell; Flavia R Machado; Greg S Martin; Geert Meyfroidt; Andrew Rhodes; Kathryn Rowan; Jean-François Timsit; Jean-Louis Vincent; Giuseppe Citerio
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Managing ICU surge during the COVID-19 crisis: rapid guidelines.

Authors:  Shadman Aziz; Yaseen M Arabi; Waleed Alhazzani; Laura Evans; Giuseppe Citerio; Katherine Fischkoff; Jorge Salluh; Geert Meyfroidt; Fayez Alshamsi; Simon Oczkowski; Elie Azoulay; Amy Price; Lisa Burry; Amy Dzierba; Andrew Benintende; Jill Morgan; Giacomo Grasselli; Andrew Rhodes; Morten H Møller; Larry Chu; Shelly Schwedhelm; John J Lowe; Du Bin; Michael D Christian
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 41.787

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Intensive care unit visiting using virtual technology: Barriers, solutions, and opportunities.

Authors:  Louise Rose; Andreas Xyrichis; Joel Meyer
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.235

2.  Validation of the Chinese Empowerment of Parents in the Intensive Care (EMPATHIC-30) Questionnaire Among Parents in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Yan Zhuang; Rong Zhang; Xi-Rong Gao; Li-Hui Zhu; Jos M Latour
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.418

3.  Mental health symptoms in family members of COVID-19 ICU survivors 3 and 12 months after ICU admission: a multicentre prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Marieke Zegers; Mark van den Boogaard; Hidde Heesakkers; Johannes G van der Hoeven; Stijn Corsten; Inge Janssen; Esther Ewalds; Dominique Burgers-Bonthuis; Thijs C D Rettig; Crétien Jacobs; Susanne van Santen; Arjen J C Slooter; Margaretha C E van der Woude
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 17.440

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.