Literature DB >> 34363147

Examining the effects of acid etching duration on the bond strength between two CAD/CAM materials and one composite resin.

Patrícia Fernandes Jerzewski Sotero da Cunha1, Julieta Gomes Tavares2, Ana Maria Spohr2, Mariá Cortina Bellan2, Caroline Hoffmann Bueno2, Laura Irgang Cardoso3.   

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of three hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching periods on the micro-tensile bond strength between two CAD-CAM ceramic systems [Vita Suprinity (VS) and feldspathic CEREC blocs (CB)] and a composite resin. The ceramics were categorized into six groups based on the surface conditioning protocol used, as follows: G1: CB-HF 5% for 20 s; G2: CB-HF 5% for 40 s; G3: CB-HF 5% for 60 s; G4: VS-HF 5% for 20 s; G5: VS-HF 5% for 40 s; G6: VS-HF 5% for 60 s. Scotchbond Universal was applied onto the pretreated ceramic surfaces and covered with Filtek Z350 XT composite resin. After 24 h, the specimens were cut into microbars (n = 16) and a micro-tensile bond strength test (μTBS) was carried out. An optical microscope was used to examine the fractured microbars. The results showed statistically significant differences between the factors tested (p < 0.01). Moreover, the mean MPa of G1(17.27), G2(13.03), G3(12.82), G4(15.83), G5(21.66), and G6(14.50) was seen to significantly differ. The predominant failure type observed was adhesive, and all three periods of HF etching produced satisfactory bonding between the composite resin and CB. An etching time of 40 s provided the highest μTBS value for VS.
© 2021. The Society of The Nippon Dental University.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing; Feldspar; Hydrofluoric acid; Lithium disilicate; Zirconia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34363147     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-021-00644-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.634


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of two test designs for evaluating the shear bond strength of resin composite cements.

Authors:  M Hu; R Weiger; J Fischer
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Effect of 6-month water storage on silane-treated resin/porcelain bonds.

Authors:  A N Stokes; J A Hood; B G Tidmarsh
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Effect of Hydrofluoric Acid Concentration on Resin Adhesion to a Feldspathic Ceramic.

Authors:  Andressa Borin Venturini; Catina Prochnow; Dagma Rambo; Andre Gundel; Luiz Felipe Valandro
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Chairside computer-aided direct ceramic inlays.

Authors:  W H Mörmann; M Brandestini; F Lutz; F Barbakow
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.677

5.  Influence of Pretreatment Methods on the Adhesion of Composite and Polymer Infiltrated Ceramic CAD-CAM Blocks.

Authors:  Isabel Emsermann; Florin Eggmann; Gabriel Krastl; Roland Weiger; Julia Amato
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers.

Authors:  Y Yoshida; K Nagakane; R Fukuda; Y Nakayama; M Okazaki; H Shintani; S Inoue; Y Tagawa; K Suzuki; J De Munck; B Van Meerbeek
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.116

7.  Influence of Surface Conditioning Protocols on Reparability of CAD/CAM Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic.

Authors:  Rana Al-Thagafi; Walid Al-Zordk; Samah Saker
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.359

  7 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Inês Francisco; Raquel Travassos; Catarina Nunes; Madalena Ribeiro; Filipa Marques; Flávia Pereira; Carlos Miguel Marto; Eunice Carrilho; Bárbara Oliveiros; Anabela Baptista Paula; Francisco Vale
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.