Literature DB >> 34362746

EULAR points to consider for conducting clinical trials and observational studies in individuals at risk of rheumatoid arthritis.

Kulveer Mankia1,2, Heidi J Siddle3,2, Andreas Kerschbaumer4, Deshire Alpizar Rodriguez5, Anca Irinel Catrina6, Juan D Canete7, Andrew P Cope8, Claire Immediato Daien9, Kevin D Deane10, Hani El Gabalawy11, Axel Finckh12, V Michael Holers13, Marios Koloumas14, Francesca Ometto15, Karim Raza16,17, Condruta Zabalan14, Annette van der Helm-van Mil18,19, Dirkjan van Schaardenburg20,21, Daniel Aletaha22, Paul Emery23,24.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite growing interest, there is no guidance or consensus on how to conduct clinical trials and observational studies in populations at risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS: An European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) task force formulated four research questions to be addressed by systematic literature review (SLR). The SLR results informed consensus statements. One overarching principle, 10 points to consider (PTC) and a research agenda were proposed. Task force members rated their level of agreement (1-10) for each PTC.
RESULTS: Epidemiological and demographic characteristics should be measured in all clinical trials and studies in at-risk individuals. Different at-risk populations, identified according to clinical presentation, were defined: asymptomatic, musculoskeletal symptoms without arthritis and early clinical arthritis. Study end-points should include the development of subclinical inflammation on imaging, clinical arthritis, RA and subsequent achievement of arthritis remission. Risk factors should be assessed at baseline and re-evaluated where appropriate; they include genetic markers and autoantibody profiling and additionally clinical symptoms and subclinical inflammation on imaging in those with symptoms and/or clinical arthritis. Trials should address the effect of the intervention on risk factors, as well as progression to clinical arthritis or RA. In patients with early clinical arthritis, pharmacological intervention has the potential to prevent RA development. Participants' knowledge of their RA risk may inform their decision to participate; information should be provided using an individually tailored approach.
CONCLUSION: These consensus statements provide data-driven guidance for rheumatologists, health professionals and investigators conducting clinical trials and observational studies in individuals at risk of RA. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthritis; autoantibodies; autoimmunity; rheumatoid

Year:  2021        PMID: 34362746     DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  8 in total

Review 1.  Perspectives of at-Risk Individuals on Preventive Intervention for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Marie Falahee; Karim Raza
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 2.  A Roadmap for Investigating Preclinical Autoimmunity Using Patient-Oriented and Epidemiologic Study Designs: Example of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Emily N Kowalski; Grace Qian; Kathleen M M Vanni; Jeffrey A Sparks
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 8.786

3.  Perceptions and experiences of individuals at-risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) knowing about their risk of developing RA and being offered preventive treatment: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Heidi J Siddle; Lara S Chapman; Kulveer Mankia; Codruța Zăbălan; Marios Kouloumas; Karim Raza; Marie Falahee; Joel Kerry; Andreas Kerschbaumer; Daniel Aletaha; Paul Emery; Suzanne H Richards
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 4.  Systematic review of quantitative preference studies of treatments for rheumatoid arthritis among patients and at-risk populations.

Authors:  Gwenda Simons; Joshua Caplan; Rachael L DiSantostefano; Jorien Veldwijk; Matthias Englbrecht; Karin Schölin Bywall; Ulrik Kihlbom; Karim Raza; Marie Falahee
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 5.156

5.  Serum proteomic networks associate with pre-clinical rheumatoid arthritis autoantibodies and longitudinal outcomes.

Authors:  Liam J O'Neil; Xiaobo Meng; Caitlin Mcfadyen; Marvin J Fritzler; Hani S El-Gabalawy
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 6.  Disease mechanisms in preclinical rheumatoid arthritis: A narrative review.

Authors:  Vasco C Romão; João Eurico Fonseca
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-19

7.  Ultrasound-guided lymph node biopsy sampling to study the immunopathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis: a well-tolerated valuable research tool.

Authors:  Renée H Fiechter; Janne W Bolt; Sander W Tas; Lisa G M van Baarsen; Marleen G H van de Sande; Caroline J Aalbers; Robert B M Landewé; Mario Maas
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 5.156

8.  Prospective Studies on the Risk of Rheumatoid Arthritis: The European Risk RA Registry.

Authors:  Paul Studenic; Aase Hensvold; Arnd Kleyer; Annette van der Helm-van Mil; Arthur G Pratt; Daniela Sieghart; Gerhard Krönke; Ruth Williams; Savia de Souza; Susanne Karlfeldt; Martina Johannesson; Niels Steen Krogh; Lars Klareskog; Anca I Catrina
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.