Literature DB >> 34362333

The impact of phased university reopenings on mitigating the spread of COVID-19: a modeling study.

Lior Rennert1, Corey A Kalbaugh2, Christopher McMahan3, Lu Shi2, Christopher C Colenda4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several American universities have experienced COVID-19 outbreaks, risking the health of their students, employees, and local communities. Such large outbreaks have drained university resources and forced several institutions to shift to remote learning and send students home, further contributing to community disease spread. Many of these outbreaks can be attributed to the large numbers of active infections returning to campus, alongside high-density social events that typically take place at the semester start. In the absence of effective mitigation measures (e.g., high-frequency testing), a phased return of students to campus is a practical intervention to minimize the student population size and density early in the semester, reduce outbreaks, preserve institutional resources, and ultimately help mitigate disease spread in communities.
METHODS: We develop dynamic compartmental SARS-CoV-2 transmission models to assess the impact of a phased reopening, in conjunction with pre-arrival testing, on minimizing on-campus outbreaks and preserving university resources (measured by isolation bed capacity). We assumed an on-campus population of N = 7500, 40% of infected students require isolation, 10 day isolation period, pre-arrival testing removes 90% of incoming infections, and that phased reopening returns one-third of the student population to campus each month. We vary the disease reproductive number (Rt) between 1.5 and 3.5 to represent the effectiveness of alternative mitigation strategies throughout the semester.
RESULTS: Compared to pre-arrival testing only or neither intervention, phased reopening with pre-arrival testing reduced peak active infections by 3 and 22% (Rt = 1.5), 22 and 29% (Rt = 2.5), 41 and 45% (Rt = 3.5), and 54 and 58% (improving Rt), respectively. Required isolation bed capacity decreased between 20 and 57% for values of Rt ≥ 2.5.
CONCLUSION: Unless highly effective mitigation measures are in place, a reopening with pre-arrival testing substantially reduces peak number of active infections throughout the semester and preserves university resources compared to the simultaneous return of all students to campus. Phased reopenings allow institutions to ensure sufficient resources are in place, improve disease mitigation strategies, or if needed, preemptively move online before the return of additional students to campus, thus preventing unnecessary harm to students, institutional faculty and staff, and local communities.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Mitigation; Modeling; Phased return; SARS-CoV-2; Students; Testing; University

Year:  2021        PMID: 34362333     DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11525-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


  7 in total

1.  Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19.

Authors:  Xi He; Eric H Y Lau; Peng Wu; Xilong Deng; Jian Wang; Xinxin Hao; Yiu Chung Lau; Jessica Y Wong; Yujuan Guan; Xinghua Tan; Xiaoneng Mo; Yanqing Chen; Baolin Liao; Weilie Chen; Fengyu Hu; Qing Zhang; Mingqiu Zhong; Yanrong Wu; Lingzhai Zhao; Fuchun Zhang; Benjamin J Cowling; Fang Li; Gabriel M Leung
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Surveillance-based informative testing for detection and containment of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks on a public university campus: an observational and modelling study.

Authors:  Lior Rennert; Christopher McMahan; Corey A Kalbaugh; Yuan Yang; Brandon Lumsden; Delphine Dean; Lesslie Pekarek; Christopher C Colenda
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2021-03-19

3.  Dynamic variations of the COVID-19 disease at different quarantine strategies in Wuhan and mainland China.

Authors:  Qianqian Cui; Zengyun Hu; Yingke Li; Junmei Han; Zhidong Teng; Jing Qian
Journal:  J Infect Public Health       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.718

4.  Modelling the impact of presemester testing on COVID-19 outbreaks in university campuses.

Authors:  Lior Rennert; Corey Andrew Kalbaugh; Lu Shi; Christopher McMahan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Screening Strategies to Permit the Safe Reopening of College Campuses in the United States.

Authors:  A David Paltiel; Amy Zheng; Rochelle P Walensky
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-07-01

6.  Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts.

Authors:  Joel Hellewell; Sam Abbott; Amy Gimma; Nikos I Bosse; Christopher I Jarvis; Timothy W Russell; James D Munday; Adam J Kucharski; W John Edmunds; Sebastian Funk; Rosalind M Eggo
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 26.763

7.  Implementation of a Pooled Surveillance Testing Program for Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections on a College Campus - Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, August 2-October 11, 2020.

Authors:  Thomas N Denny; Laura Andrews; Mattia Bonsignori; Kyle Cavanaugh; Michael B Datto; Anastasia Deckard; C Todd DeMarco; Nicole DeNaeyer; Carol A Epling; Thaddeus Gurley; Steven B Haase; Chloe Hallberg; John Harer; Charles L Kneifel; Mark J Lee; Raul Louzao; M Anthony Moody; Zack Moore; Christopher R Polage; Jamie Puglin; P Hunter Spotts; John A Vaughn; Cameron R Wolfe
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 17.586

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  The impact of COVID-19 safety interventions on creating a controlled environment on campus.

Authors:  Sana Mahmood; Sonia Ijaz Haider; Hamna Shahbaz; Ali Aahil Noorali; Noreen Afzal; Aziz Jiwani; Samar Zaki; Unab Iqbal Khan; Khairulnissa Ajani; Muhammad Tariq; Rozina Karmaliani; Adil Hussain Haider
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.