BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is a key tool for cardiac work-up. However, arrhythmia can be responsible for arrhythmia-related artifacts (ARA) and increased scan time using segmented sequences. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of cardiac arrhythmia on image quality in a comparison of a compressed sensing real-time (CSrt) cine sequence with the reference prospectively gated segmented balanced steady-state free precession (Cineref) technique regarding ARA. METHODS: A total of 71 consecutive adult patients (41 males; mean age = 59.5 ± 20.1 years (95% CI: 54.7-64.2 years)) referred for CMR examination with concomitant irregular heart rate (defined by an RR interval coefficient of variation >10%) during scanning were prospectively enrolled. For each patient, two cine sequences were systematically acquired: first, the reference prospectively triggered multi-breath-hold Cineref sequence including a short-axis stack, one four-chamber slice, and a couple of two-chamber slices; second, an additional single breath-hold CSrt sequence providing the same slices as the reference technique. Two radiologists independently assessed ARA and image quality (overall, acquisition, and edge sharpness) for both techniques. RESULTS: The mean heart rate was 71.8 ± 19.0 (SD) beat per minute (bpm) (95% CI: 67.4-76.3 bpm) and its coefficient of variation was 25.0 ± 9.4 (SD) % (95% CI: 22.8-27.2%). Acquisition was significantly faster with CSrt than with Cineref (Cineref: 556.7 ± 145.4 (SD) s (95% CI: 496.7-616.7 s); CSrt: 23.9 ± 7.9 (SD) s (95% CI: 20.6-27.1 s); p < 0.0001). A total of 599 pairs of cine slices were evaluated (median: 8 (range: 6-14) slices per patient). The mean proportion of ARA-impaired slices per patient was 85.9 ± 22.7 (SD) % using Cineref, but this was figure was zero using CSrt (p < 0.0001). The European CMR registry artifact score was lower with CSrt (median: 1 (range: 0-5)) than with Cineref (median: 3 (range: 0-3); p < 0.0001). Subjective image quality was higher in CSrt than in Cineref (median: 3 (range: 1-3) versus 2 (range: 1-4), respectively; p < 0.0001). In line, edge sharpness was higher on CSrt cine than on Cineref images (0.054 ± 0.016 pixel-1 (95% CI: 0.050-0.057 pixel-1) versus 0.042 ± 0.022 pixel-1 (95% CI: 0.037-0.047 pixel-1), respectively; p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Compressed sensing real-time cine drastically reduces arrhythmia-related artifacts and thus improves cine image quality in patients with arrhythmia.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is a key tool for cardiac work-up. However, arrhythmia can be responsible for arrhythmia-related artifacts (ARA) and increased scan time using segmented sequences. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of cardiac arrhythmia on image quality in a comparison of a compressed sensing real-time (CSrt) cine sequence with the reference prospectively gated segmented balanced steady-state free precession (Cineref) technique regarding ARA. METHODS: A total of 71 consecutive adult patients (41 males; mean age = 59.5 ± 20.1 years (95% CI: 54.7-64.2 years)) referred for CMR examination with concomitant irregular heart rate (defined by an RR interval coefficient of variation >10%) during scanning were prospectively enrolled. For each patient, two cine sequences were systematically acquired: first, the reference prospectively triggered multi-breath-hold Cineref sequence including a short-axis stack, one four-chamber slice, and a couple of two-chamber slices; second, an additional single breath-hold CSrt sequence providing the same slices as the reference technique. Two radiologists independently assessed ARA and image quality (overall, acquisition, and edge sharpness) for both techniques. RESULTS: The mean heart rate was 71.8 ± 19.0 (SD) beat per minute (bpm) (95% CI: 67.4-76.3 bpm) and its coefficient of variation was 25.0 ± 9.4 (SD) % (95% CI: 22.8-27.2%). Acquisition was significantly faster with CSrt than with Cineref (Cineref: 556.7 ± 145.4 (SD) s (95% CI: 496.7-616.7 s); CSrt: 23.9 ± 7.9 (SD) s (95% CI: 20.6-27.1 s); p < 0.0001). A total of 599 pairs of cine slices were evaluated (median: 8 (range: 6-14) slices per patient). The mean proportion of ARA-impaired slices per patient was 85.9 ± 22.7 (SD) % using Cineref, but this was figure was zero using CSrt (p < 0.0001). The European CMR registry artifact score was lower with CSrt (median: 1 (range: 0-5)) than with Cineref (median: 3 (range: 0-3); p < 0.0001). Subjective image quality was higher in CSrt than in Cineref (median: 3 (range: 1-3) versus 2 (range: 1-4), respectively; p < 0.0001). In line, edge sharpness was higher on CSrt cine than on Cineref images (0.054 ± 0.016 pixel-1 (95% CI: 0.050-0.057 pixel-1) versus 0.042 ± 0.022 pixel-1 (95% CI: 0.037-0.047 pixel-1), respectively; p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Compressed sensing real-time cine drastically reduces arrhythmia-related artifacts and thus improves cine image quality in patients with arrhythmia.
Entities:
Keywords:
CMR; arrhythmia; artifact; cardiac; compressed sensing; fast imaging; heart; magnetic resonance; real-time