| Literature DB >> 34358994 |
Afshin Shoeibi1, Marjane Khodatars2, Mahboobeh Jafari3, Parisa Moridian4, Mitra Rezaei5, Roohallah Alizadehsani6, Fahime Khozeimeh6, Juan Manuel Gorriz7, Jónathan Heras8, Maryam Panahiazar9, Saeid Nahavandi6, U Rajendra Acharya10.
Abstract
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a type of brain disease which causes visual, sensory, and motor problems for people with a detrimental effect on the functioning of the nervous system. In order to diagnose MS, multiple screening methods have been proposed so far; among them, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has received considerable attention among physicians. MRI modalities provide physicians with fundamental information about the structure and function of the brain, which is crucial for the rapid diagnosis of MS lesions. Diagnosing MS using MRI is time-consuming, tedious, and prone to manual errors. Research on the implementation of computer aided diagnosis system (CADS) based on artificial intelligence (AI) to diagnose MS involves conventional machine learning and deep learning (DL) methods. In conventional machine learning, feature extraction, feature selection, and classification steps are carried out by using trial and error; on the contrary, these steps in DL are based on deep layers whose values are automatically learn. In this paper, a complete review of automated MS diagnosis methods performed using DL techniques with MRI neuroimaging modalities is provided. Initially, the steps involved in various CADS proposed using MRI modalities and DL techniques for MS diagnosis are investigated. The important preprocessing techniques employed in various works are analyzed. Most of the published papers on MS diagnosis using MRI modalities and DL are presented. The most significant challenges facing and future direction of automated diagnosis of MS using MRI modalities and DL techniques are also provided.Entities:
Keywords: Deep learning; Diagnosis; MRI; Multiple sclerosis; Neuroimaging
Year: 2021 PMID: 34358994 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104697
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Biol Med ISSN: 0010-4825 Impact factor: 4.589