| Literature DB >> 34358932 |
Xu Zhang1, Zhongwen Lu1, Xiaohan Ren1, Xinglin Chen1, Xiang Zhou1, Xuan Zhou1, Tongtong Zhang1, Yiyang Liu2, Shangqian Wang3, Chao Qin4.
Abstract
In recent years, organophosphate ester flame retardants (OPFRs), which have been regarded as alternatives for brominated flame retardants (BFRs), have become widely used in building materials, textiles, and electric equipment. Elucidating the relationship between OPFRs and tumors holds great significance for the treatment and prevention of diseases. In this work, we found a new method for predicting the correlation between the interactive genes of OPFRs and tumors. Transcriptome profiles and OPFR information were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the Genotype-Tissue Expression, Comparative Toxicogenomics, and PharmMapper databases. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis showed that interactive genes were mainly enriched in prostate cancer, steroid metabolic process, and steroid hormone regulation. Furthermore, protein-protein interaction network analysis revealed 33 biological hub genes. The operating characteristic curves and survival analysis showed the role of key genes in predicting the prognosis of prostate cancer. Gene target prediction and gene set variation analysis proved that OPFRs and their metabolites exert potential effects on prostate cancer. Colony formation assay showed that the cells with AR, mTOR and DDIT3 knockdown could remarkably mitigate the cell proliferation ability in both PC-3 and LNCap cells. Transwell assay demonstrated that the silencing of AR, mTOR and DDIT3 could significantly inhibit the cell invasion capacity of prostate cells. Triphenyl phosphate (TPP) significantly increase the cell proliferation ability and promote cell invasion capacity. AR, mTOR and DDIT3 in the PC-3 and LNCap cells were significantly upregulated with 10-6 M TPP treated.Entities:
Keywords: Genetic comprehension; Organophosphate ester flame retardants; Prostate cancer
Year: 2021 PMID: 34358932 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112589
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf ISSN: 0147-6513 Impact factor: 6.291