Literature DB >> 3435821

A time-saving incremental cycle ergometer protocol to determine peak oxygen consumption.

J Lawler1, S K Powers, S Dodd.   

Abstract

Previously we have demonstrated that an accelerated arm ergometry testing protocol results in a higher peak oxygen consumption than continuous or discontinuous protocols reported in the literature (Brit. J. Sports Med. 20: 25-26, 1986). The purpose of this investigation was to determine if an accelerated protocol was superior to two commonly used protocols in cycle ergometry. Nine male subjects were tested on three different exercise protocols; a discontinuous test (DT), a continuous test (CT) and a new proposed "jump-max test" (JMT). The CT began at a work rate of 70 W with the power output (PO) being increased 35 W.min-1. The DT began at a work rate of 70 W; the work rate was increased by 35 W every 2 minutes with 2-minutes rest between stages. The JMT began with a 3-minute pretest to determine a PO which elicited a HR of 145 +/- 5 bpm. After a 2-minute rest, subjects began exercise at the predetermined work rate with the PO being increased 35 W.min-1. Testing sessions were terminated when subjects failed to maintain the desired PO. No significant difference (p greater than 0.05) existed in peak PO or peak oxygen consumption (VO2) between the three protocols. However, JMT protocol did result in a shorter time to exhaustion than the other protocols employed (P less than 0.05).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3435821      PMCID: PMC1478466          DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.21.4.171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  16 in total

1.  Maximal oxygen uptake and heart rate in various types of muscular activity.

Authors:  P O ASTRAND; B SALTIN
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1961-11       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  Assessment of physical work capacity.

Authors:  T HETTINGER; N C BIRKHEAD; S M HORVATH; B ISSEKUTZ; K RODAHL
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  An experimental study of physical fitness of Air Force personnel.

Authors:  B BALKE; R W WARE
Journal:  U S Armed Forces Med J       Date:  1959-06

Review 4.  Biochemical adaptations to endurance exercise in muscle.

Authors:  J O Holloszy; F W Booth
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 19.318

5.  Endurance capacity for prolonged exercise on the bicycle ergometer.

Authors:  M A Gleser; J A Vogel
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 3.531

6.  Maximal aerobic power during laddermill climbing, uphill running, and cycling.

Authors:  E Kamon; K B Pandolf
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 3.531

7.  Comparison of maximal oxygen uptake values determined by predicted and actual methods.

Authors:  R G Glassford; G H Baycroft; A W Sedgwick; R B Macnab
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 3.531

8.  Specificity of the anaerobic threshold in endurance trained cyclists and runners.

Authors:  R T Withers; W M Sherman; J M Miller; D L Costill
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1981

9.  Optimizing the exercise protocol for cardiopulmonary assessment.

Authors:  M J Buchfuhrer; J E Hansen; T E Robinson; D Y Sue; K Wasserman; B J Whipp
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1983-11

10.  Peak oxygen uptake in arm ergometry: effects of testing protocol.

Authors:  R Walker; S Powers; M K Stuart
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 13.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.