Background: Understanding child characteristics that relate to weight management treatment outcome could help identify opportunities for intervention innovation or tailoring. The limited evidence available is inconsistent regarding whether and which aspects of children's general or food-specific impulsivity and inhibition relate to treatment outcomes. Methods: Children with (n = 54) and without obesity (n = 22) were compared on various measures of impulsivity and inhibition. Children with obesity (n = 40) then completed family-based treatment for weight management. Analyses examined associations between baseline children's impulsivity and inhibition and child weight status change (BMI z-score) and between treatment-based changes in impulsivity and inhibition and weight status change, with and without adjustment by baseline functional magnetic resonance imaging-measured appetitive drive. Results: Children with obesity scored more poorly on some, but not all, measures of impulsivity and inhibition than children without obesity. Lower baseline general inhibition and greater parent-report of child impulsivity were associated (independently) with greater improvements in child weight status, with modest attenuation after appetite drive adjustment. Children improved task-based general inhibition during treatment. Improvements in general inhibition and snack food discounting were associated with better child weight outcomes, although adjusting for baseline values attenuated these associations. Conclusions: Children with obesity having greater initial impulsivity had better weight outcomes in treatment even after adjusting for initial appetitive drive. In contrast, improvements in task-based inhibition and food-related discounting during treatment were also related to better outcomes. Research is needed on innovative approaches to better address impulsivity and inhibition in children's weight management. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT02484976.
Background: Understanding child characteristics that relate to weight management treatment outcome could help identify opportunities for intervention innovation or tailoring. The limited evidence available is inconsistent regarding whether and which aspects of children's general or food-specific impulsivity and inhibition relate to treatment outcomes. Methods: Children with (n = 54) and without obesity (n = 22) were compared on various measures of impulsivity and inhibition. Children with obesity (n = 40) then completed family-based treatment for weight management. Analyses examined associations between baseline children's impulsivity and inhibition and child weight status change (BMI z-score) and between treatment-based changes in impulsivity and inhibition and weight status change, with and without adjustment by baseline functional magnetic resonance imaging-measured appetitive drive. Results: Children with obesity scored more poorly on some, but not all, measures of impulsivity and inhibition than children without obesity. Lower baseline general inhibition and greater parent-report of child impulsivity were associated (independently) with greater improvements in child weight status, with modest attenuation after appetite drive adjustment. Children improved task-based general inhibition during treatment. Improvements in general inhibition and snack food discounting were associated with better child weight outcomes, although adjusting for baseline values attenuated these associations. Conclusions: Children with obesity having greater initial impulsivity had better weight outcomes in treatment even after adjusting for initial appetitive drive. In contrast, improvements in task-based inhibition and food-related discounting during treatment were also related to better outcomes. Research is needed on innovative approaches to better address impulsivity and inhibition in children's weight management. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT02484976.
Authors: S Davids; H Lauffer; K Thoms; M Jagdhuhn; H Hirschfeld; M Domin; A Hamm; M Lotze Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2009-10-06 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Sonya Mehta; Susan J Melhorn; Anne Smeraglio; Vidhi Tyagi; Thomas Grabowski; Michael W Schwartz; Ellen A Schur Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Denise E Wilfley; Richard I Stein; Brian E Saelens; Danyte S Mockus; Georg E Matt; Helen A Hayden-Wade; R Robinson Welch; Kenneth B Schechtman; Paul A Thompson; Leonard H Epstein Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-10-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: John R Best; Kelly R Theim; Dana M Gredysa; Richard I Stein; R Robinson Welch; Brian E Saelens; Michael G Perri; Kenneth B Schechtman; Leonard H Epstein; Denise E Wilfley Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2012-08-27