Literature DB >> 34357446

Changed inflammatory markers after application of 4DryField PH for adhesion prevention in gynecological surgery.

Nicole Ziegler1, Luz Angela Torres-de la Roche2, Rajesh Devassy2, Rudy Leon De Wilde2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The development of peritoneal adhesions and the effects of different antiadhesion agents on such mechanisms are not fully understood. Temporary rises of the C-reactive protein (CRP) level have been reported after antiadhesion agent application. We present the changes of inflammation markers observed after use of a starch-based polysaccharide certified for adhesion prevention and hemostasis 4DF (4DryField® PH).
METHOD: Retrospective comparative analysis of inflammation markers in 40 patients undergoing laparoscopic adhesiolysis with or without adhesion prophylaxis was conducted. Statistical comparisons were performed by means of paired or unpaired t tests (for normally distributed continuous data), Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank tests or Mann-Whitney tests (for not-normally distributed continuous data), Mantel-Cox tests (for continuous data describing time intervals), and Fisher's exact tests (for discrete data).
RESULTS: The maximum post-operative CRP level was significantly elevated in the 4DF group (87 vs. 29%; p < 0.001), whereas leukocyte concentration and body temperature did not differ between groups. No signs of infection were detected in any of the patients and CRP levels spontaneously dropped to normal values within few days. No side effects or complications were observed in both groups. In second-look surgeries performed for other diagnoses 1-56 weeks after the first interventions, no remnants of 4DF or any peritoneal inflammatory reactions were observed.
CONCLUSION: The starch-based polysaccharide 4DF can be considered safe and does not induce inflammatory reactions of clinical significance. Further studies regarding 4DF degradation are recommended and, apart from macrophage migration, could also examine corresponding markers such as IL-6 and PCT.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adhesiolysis; Adhesion prophylaxis; Hemostasis; Inflammation markers; Peritoneal adhesion; Starch-based polysaccharide

Year:  2021        PMID: 34357446     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06095-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  4 in total

1.  Treatment of de-peritonealized intestine with 4DryField® PH prevents adhesions between non-resorbable intra-peritoneal hernia mesh and bowel.

Authors:  Markus Winny; Lavinia Maegel; Leonie Victoria Grethe; Danny Jonigk; Paul Borchert; Alexander Kaltenborn; Harald Schrem; Juergen Klempnauer; Daniel Poehnert
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  An unusual complication after hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm) application.

Authors:  Feza H Remzi; Mustafa Oncel; James M Church; Anthony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Use of Modified Polysaccharide 4DryField (®) PH for Adhesion Prevention and Hemostasis in Gynecological Surgery: A Two-Center Observational Study by Second-Look Laparoscopy.

Authors:  Matthias Korell; Nicole Ziegler; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-01-24       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Adhesions and Anti-Adhesion Systems Highlights.

Authors:  L A Torres-De La Roche; R Campo; R Devassy; A Di Spiezio Sardo; A Hooker; P Koninckx; B Urman; M Wallwiener; R L De Wilde
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2019-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.