Natalie Perera1, Michelle Gold1,2, Lisa O'Driscoll3, Naomi T Katz1,2,4. 1. Palliative Care Service, 5392Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 2. Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 3. Advance Care Planning and Improving End of Life Care, 5392Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 4. Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As deaths in hospitals increase, clear discussions regarding resuscitation status and treatment limitations, referred to as goals of care (GOC), are vital. GOC may need revision as disease and patient priorities change over time. There is limited data about who is involved in GOC discussions, and how this changes as patients deteriorate in hospital. AIMS: To review the timing and clinicians involved in GOC discussions for a cohort of patients who died in hospital. METHODS: Retrospective observational audit of 80 consecutive end of life admissions between March 11th and April 9th, 2019. RESULTS: Of 80 patients, 75 (93.6%) had GOC recorded during their admission, about half for ward-based non-burdensome symptom management or end-of-life care. GOC were revised in 68.0% of cases. Medical staff involved in initial versus final GOC discussions included home team junior doctor (54.7% versus 72.5%), home team consultant (37.3% versus 56.9%) and ICU doctor (16.0% versus 21.6%). For initial versus final GOC decisions, patients were involved in 34.7% versus 31.4%, and family in 53.3% versus 86.3%. Dying was documented for 92.0% of patients and this was documented to have been communicated to the family and patient in 98.6% and 19.5% of cases respectively. CONCLUSIONS: As patients deteriorated, family and senior clinician involvement in GOC discussions increased, but patient involvement did not. Junior doctors were most heavily involved in discussions. We advocate for further GOC training and modeling to enhance junior doctors' confidence and competence in conducting and involving patients and families in GOC conversations.
BACKGROUND: As deaths in hospitals increase, clear discussions regarding resuscitation status and treatment limitations, referred to as goals of care (GOC), are vital. GOC may need revision as disease and patient priorities change over time. There is limited data about who is involved in GOC discussions, and how this changes as patients deteriorate in hospital. AIMS: To review the timing and clinicians involved in GOC discussions for a cohort of patients who died in hospital. METHODS: Retrospective observational audit of 80 consecutive end of life admissions between March 11th and April 9th, 2019. RESULTS: Of 80 patients, 75 (93.6%) had GOC recorded during their admission, about half for ward-based non-burdensome symptom management or end-of-life care. GOC were revised in 68.0% of cases. Medical staff involved in initial versus final GOC discussions included home team junior doctor (54.7% versus 72.5%), home team consultant (37.3% versus 56.9%) and ICU doctor (16.0% versus 21.6%). For initial versus final GOC decisions, patients were involved in 34.7% versus 31.4%, and family in 53.3% versus 86.3%. Dying was documented for 92.0% of patients and this was documented to have been communicated to the family and patient in 98.6% and 19.5% of cases respectively. CONCLUSIONS: As patients deteriorated, family and senior clinician involvement in GOC discussions increased, but patient involvement did not. Junior doctors were most heavily involved in discussions. We advocate for further GOC training and modeling to enhance junior doctors' confidence and competence in conducting and involving patients and families in GOC conversations.
Entities:
Keywords:
communication; death and dying; end-of-life; goals of care; resuscitation status