Yasumitsu Saiki1, Kazutaka Yamada2, Masafumi Tanaka2, Mitsuko Fukunaga2, Yasue Irei2, Takafumi Suzuki2. 1. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Coloproctology Center Takano Hospital, 3-2-55 Oe, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 862-0971, Japan. y-saiki@takano-hospital.jp. 2. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Coloproctology Center Takano Hospital, 3-2-55 Oe, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 862-0971, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Anal canal adenocarcinoma (AC) is rare and its surgical outcomes and prognostic factors (PFs) are not well understood. The aim of this retrospective study was to identify the characteristics and PFs of AC, using population-based data in Japan. METHODS: Patients with AC (n = 390) or lower rectal adenocarcinoma (LR) (n = 12,477) diagnosed between1991 and 2006 were enrolled in this study. We compared the clinical- and patient-related factors of the two diseases and then examined propensity score matching, overall survival (OS), and PFs. RESULTS: AC tended to develop more often in women and in patients of advanced age. Macroscopically, AC was of an unclassified type and microscopically, it was of high-grade histological types such as mucinous adenocarcinoma, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (por), or signet-ring cell carcinoma (sig), with a high frequency of inguinal node metastasis (P < 0.05). The 5 year OS rates were 56.9% for AC and 67.9% for LR (P = 0.002). The PFs of AC were a high-grade histological type (por/sig), T, N, and M. CONCLUSIONS: AC has a significantly worse prognosis than LR. Moreover, the AC lymph node metastatic sites for AC, especially the inguinal nodes, are different from those for LR.
PURPOSE: Anal canal adenocarcinoma (AC) is rare and its surgical outcomes and prognostic factors (PFs) are not well understood. The aim of this retrospective study was to identify the characteristics and PFs of AC, using population-based data in Japan. METHODS: Patients with AC (n = 390) or lower rectal adenocarcinoma (LR) (n = 12,477) diagnosed between1991 and 2006 were enrolled in this study. We compared the clinical- and patient-related factors of the two diseases and then examined propensity score matching, overall survival (OS), and PFs. RESULTS: AC tended to develop more often in women and in patients of advanced age. Macroscopically, AC was of an unclassified type and microscopically, it was of high-grade histological types such as mucinous adenocarcinoma, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (por), or signet-ring cell carcinoma (sig), with a high frequency of inguinal node metastasis (P < 0.05). The 5 year OS rates were 56.9% for AC and 67.9% for LR (P = 0.002). The PFs of AC were a high-grade histological type (por/sig), T, N, and M. CONCLUSIONS: AC has a significantly worse prognosis than LR. Moreover, the AC lymph node metastatic sites for AC, especially the inguinal nodes, are different from those for LR.