| Literature DB >> 34354425 |
Mohammad Sarraf1, Monia Jemni2, Ibrahim Kahramanoğlu3, Francisco Artés4,5, Shirin Shahkoomahally6, Ahmad Namsi2, Muhammad Ihtisham7, Marian Brestic8, Mostafa Mohammadi9, Anshu Rastogi10.
Abstract
The popularity of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) fruit is increasing, therefore the demand for high-quality date palm fruit with less or no chemical treatment is the topic of interest for date producers and consumers. The quality of date palm fruit is much dependent on its postharvest handling and processing. For preventing the degradation and maintenance of the high quality of dates during the storage an appropriate harvest and post-harvest processes are required. The process should control the biotic and abiotic factors like insects, fungus, temperature, as well as handling and processing of dates. Therefore, in this work, we reviewed the literature related to the protection of date fruits during their post-harvest life. The commercially viable advance and updated techniques that can be used to avoid storage losses and problems while keeping fruit quality (nutritional, color, flavor, and texture) and microbial safety under optimal conditions are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Dates; Handling; Phoenix dactylifera; Storage; Sustainable treatments
Year: 2021 PMID: 34354425 PMCID: PMC8324939 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.04.035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Fig. 1World Production of Date Palm “between” 1990–2018 (FAOSTAT, 2018).
Fig. 2A systematic representation of consideration points for date palm fruits packaging and storage.
Fig. 3Stages of maturation of date palm fruits.
Different preservation methods for date palm fruit.
| Methods/Techniques employed | Advantages | Disadvantages | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refrigeration | Slow down enzymatic reactions, as well as the activity of microbial and insect’s life | The efficacy of low temperatures depends on (i) the inherent initial quality attributes of the dates, (ii) the microbe and insects present at harvest, and (iii) the temperature applied. | ( |
| Fumigation | Killing insect life in all its stages of development: egg, larva, pupa and adult | Treatment must not be applied to fresh fruits or when stored under deep refrigeration, and the average practical dose is 15 g/m3 for 12–24 h at 15–16 °C | ( |
| Heat Treatment | 100% mortality of emigration and control of nitidulid beetles in dates | Cause discolouration and have a blistering effect that separates the skin from the flesh of the fruit | ( |
| Modified Atmosphere Packaging (MAP) | The most effective to preserve the quality maintenance of dates with limited effects on the appearance of physiological disorder signs | Limited effects on the appearance of date fruits | ( |
| Edible Coating | Improve the appearance of dates, protect the fruits, and reduce stickiness in case of soft dates | Some negative influence mainly on sensory attributes and flavor | ( |
| Ozone(O3) Treatment | Reduce or eliminate all life stages (adults, larvae, and eggs) of Indian meal moth ( | Effectiveness depends on the application dose, temperature, duration, pH and soluble solids in water and even on the method of washing, as dips or drench. | ( |
| Electron-Beams | 100% for all electron-beam treatments, also hatches were less compared to microwave, steaming and fumigation | The high cost as known with irradiation and other electromagnetic rays, and technical feasibility | ( |
| The UV-C light | The main advantages of UV-C light is that it does not leave any residue, is lethal to most types of microorganisms, is easy to use without extensive safety equipment, and does not have legal restrictions | Exposure of cells to visible light after UV-C treatment induces enzymatic photorepair and expression of excision-repair genes that may restore DNA integrity | ( |
| Electrolyzed water | Electrolyzed water involves on-site production of the disinfectant, which means there are no chemicals to store or handling costs for dealing with them | The effects of Electrolyzed water on by-product formation should be more studied | ( |
Biological, physical, and chemical factors reported to cause a deteriorating impact on date palm fruits.
| Factors | Alterations cause | Effect on dates | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microbiological | Fungal species: | Attack fruit in the khalal stage and the Rutab stage. | ( |
| yeast genera: | Yeast-infected dates develop an alcoholic odor (become fermented). Fermentation by yeast also results in souring of dates due to accumulation of ethanol and/or acetic acid with moisture content above 25% when kept at temperatures above 20 °C and its severity increases with duration and temperature of storage. Storage at low temperatures reduces incidence and severity of souring | ( | |
| Bacteria: | Bacteria are responsible for the acidification of dates (transformation of sugar in lactic acid or citric acid) ( | ( | |
| Physical | The physical alterations, commonly of mechanical origin, occurs during different operations of date’s manipulation (shocks, crushing and drying) | These operations cause lesions that accelerate the process of biological alterations | ( |
| Chemical | The richness of the date | It causes sucrose inversion. This inversion can cause a decrease in the equilibrium of the relative humidity of dates and a change in its natural flavor | ( |
| Sugar spotting (sugaring) | It results from crystallization of sugars in the flesh of soft date cultivars | ||
| Skin separation (puffiness) | The skin is dry, hard and brittle, and is separated from the flesh | ||
| Biochemical | Enzymatic browning | The browning reaction requires the presence of O2, phenolic compounds and polyphenol oxidases (PPO) enzymes and is usually initiated by the enzymatic oxidation of monophenols into o-diphenols and o-diphenols into quinones, which undergo further non-enzymatic polymerization leading to the formation of pigments | ( |
| Nonenzymatic browning | It causes browning reactions. | ( | |
| Insect infestation | Affects fruit at the Hababook stage. The larvae develop around the fruit producing white filament netting, which in turn causes fruits to drop prematurely | ( | |
| the fruit dropping at the immature green stage | |||
| It attacks the fruit while still green and forms white filaments around the fruit, which reduce photosynthesis and the fruits do not reach maturity. | |||
| It causes significant postharvest losses in stored dates. The moth is common on dates, pomegranates and carobs. | |||
| They cause serious damage to dates on the bunch or after harvest. | |||
| They infest stored dates. | |||
| It is a postharvest pest that can attack dates in the orchard, packinghouses or stores. Dates at the Kimri, Khalal, and Rutab stages are not attacked by this insect, only fruits at the Tamar stage. | |||
| It attacks stored dates |
Fig. 4Changes in respiration rate of Deglet nour cv at Tamar stage with 20.13 ± 1.35% moisture content at 0 and 20 °C (Jemni et al., 2019b).
Fig. 5Changes in ethylene emission of Deglet nour cv at Tamar stage with 20.13 ± 1.35% moisture content at 0 and 20 °C (Jemni et al., 2019b).