| Literature DB >> 34354398 |
Farheen Shaikh1, Tazeen Shah2, Norah Abdullah Bazekh Madkhali3, Ahmed Gaber4,5, Walaa F Alsanie5,6, Sanum Ali7, Shafaq Ansari8, Muhammad Rafiq9, R Z Sayyed10, Nadir Ali Rind11, Khalid Hussain Rind11, Akhtar Hussain Shar11, Syed Mohammed Basheeruddin Asdaq12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is one of the important public health issues worldwide. The Fat mass obesity (FTO) gene rs-9939609 variant identified single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) with the T to A missense mutation, and has a strong association with T2DM. FTO gene is present on chromosome "16q12.2" comprising of nine exons. FTO gene rs-9939609 a variant is commonly found in the Pakistani Population. The purpose of the study was to alert the population about the rs-9939609 variant SNP, having a strong association with T2DM.Entities:
Keywords: BMI; FTO gene; Obesity; SNP; T2DM
Year: 2021 PMID: 34354398 PMCID: PMC8325002 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.06.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Fig. 1(a) Genomic DNA extraction and resolved on 0.7% Agarose Gels Electrophoresis: Presence of Single DNA in Gel Confirm the Purity of DNA. (b) FTO Gene SNP rs-993906 variant PCR Amplified Products Represented from (lanes 1–9).
Fig. 2Demographic distribution of study participants.
Age frequencies of study participants.
| Age (years) | Percentages (%) | Mean ± SD | P- value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30–39 | (7.4%) | 2.78 ± 1.47 | <0.001 |
| 40–49 | (56.3%) | 3.37 ± 3.37 | |
| 50–59 | (25.8%) | 4.24 ± 1.66 | |
| 60–69 | (8.4%) | 3.56 ± 1.36 | |
| Above 70 | (2.1%) | 5.0 ± 1.41 |
Anthropometric Parameters of Obese and T2DM Participants as Compared with Normal Healthy Individuals.
| Variables | Group-A | Group –B | Group- C | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Females (n = 25) | Healthy Males (n = 25) | Obese Females (n = 35) | Obese Males (n = 35) | Diabetes Mellitus Type-II Females (n = 35) | Diabetes Mellitus Type-II Males (n = 35) | ||
| Age (Years) | 44.16 ± 4.29 | 45.92 ± 8.02 | 41.8 ± 11.3 | 44.6 ± 6.3 | 51.1 ± 6.9 | 53.1 ± 5.8 | <0.001 |
| Weight (Kg) | 55.7 ± 7.9 | 62.8 ± 4.94 | 95.9 ± 11.2 | 102 ± 9.3 | 87.9 ± 11.5 | 99.5 ± 10.2 | <0.001 |
| Height (Cm) | 160 ± 4.02 | 173 ± 4.8 | 162.5 ± 4.7 | 180.8 ± 6.01 | 158.8 ± 4.92 | 179.2 ± 6.12 | NS = 0.006 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 21.3 ± 2.0 | 21.0 ± 1.8 | 30.48 ± 3.9 | 32.5 ± 4.1 | 34.8 ± 4.9 | 31.8 ± 3.49 | <0.001 |
| Neck circumference (Cm) | 32.8 ± 1.08 | 33.7 ± 1.8 | 39.9 ± 1.41 | 43.1 ± 2.01 | 39.3 ± 1.36 | 52.2 ± 2.3 | <0.001 |
| Waist circumference (Cm) | 87.8 ± 0.31 | 98.1 ± 0.58 | 104.1 ± 2.0 | 122.8 ± 1.3 | 103.8 ± 2.2 | 107.2 ± 6.3 | <0.001 |
| Hip circumference (Cm) | 88.7 ± 0.4 | 97.9 ± 102 | 105.4 ± 2.5 | 123.5 ± 1.46 | 104.9 ± 2.1 | 107.6 ± 6.4 | <0.001 |
| Waist/Hip ratio | 0.98 ± 0.005 | 0.99 ± 0.01 | 0.99 ± 0.01 | 0.99 ± 0.005 | 0.99 ± 0.008 | 0.92 ± 0.05 | =0.059 NS |
| Systolic Blood pressure (mmHg) | 118 ± 13.5 | 120 ± 12.6 | 123 ± 6.9 | 125.6 ± 10.4 | 123.7 ± 9.5 | 134 ± 11.9 | =0.053 NS |
| Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) | 72.7 ± 8.3 | 72.96 ± 7.9 | 78.6 ± 11.04 | 78.5 ± 12.6 | 83.8 ± 10.4 | 90.9 ± 11.03 | =0.051 NS |
| Pulse (b/min) | 72 ± 0.5 | 72.5 ± 0.1 | 72.1 ± 0.2 | 73.2 ± 0.1 | 73.5 ± 0.1 | 72.5 ± 0.1 | =0.058 NS |
| Temperature (°F) | 98.5 ± 1.5 | 98.6 ± 0.5 | 98.16 ± 1.2 | 98.5 ± 0.6 | 97.95 ± 1.1 | 98.9 ± 0.5 | =0.056 NS |
| Fasting Blood Sugar (mg/dl) | 83.76 ± 6.07 | 89.2 ± 6.4 | 95.42 ± 6.6 | 90.8 ± 16.3 | 129.7 ± 18.7 | 143.8 ± 34.54 | <0.001 |
| HbA1c (%) | 4.84 ± 0.36 | 4.79 ± 0.39 | 5.36 ± 1.67 | 6.86 ± 0.84 | 8.15 ± 1.9 | 8.57 ± 1.61 | <0.001 |
Fig. 3Distribution of BMI(Kg/m2) frequencies among study participants (n = 190).
Comparison of Lipid Profile of Obese and Type 2 Diabetic participants among Normal Healthy Females by applying ANOVA-Test.
| Variables | Group-A | Group –B | Group- C | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Females (n = 25) | Healthy Males (n = 25) | Obese Females (n = 35) | Obese Males (n = 35) | Diabetes Mellitus Type-II Females (n = 35) | Diabetes Mellitus Type-II Males (n = 35) | ||
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 135.8 ± 29.7 | 146.8 ± 22.7 | 235.8 ± 29.7 | 254.3 ± 46.4 | 296.9 ± 54.6 | 316 ± 66.1 | <0.001 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dl) | 112.6 ± 19.9 | 132.7 ± 32.8 | 225.9 ± 129 | 149.2 ± 49.8 | 292.7 ± 49.8 | 223 ± 79.8 | <0.001 |
| HDL-C (mg/dl)) | 39.8 ± 6.98 | 40.5 ± 9.8 | 31.9 ± 6.83 | 35.6 ± 7.6 | 30.2 ± 7.6 | 33.9 ± 6.6 | <0.001 |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 81.36 ± 18.9 | 97.32 ± 29.4 | 99.5 ± 36.8 | 114.2 ± 44.9 | 132.5 ± 36.7 | 147.7 ± 41.9 | <0.001 |
| VLDL-C (mg/dl) | 24.8 ± 5.86 | 21.6 ± 7.5 | 26.4 ± 7.2 | 31.1 ± 22.6 | 32.9 ± 8.01 | 42 ± 14.9 | <0.001 |
Fig. 4(a) Chromatograph representing the FTO gene polymorphism in rs9939609 at 100 bp position SNP (T/A). (b) Chromatograph representing the FTO gene polymorphism in rs9939609 at 100 bp position SNP (T/T). (c) Chromatograph representing the FTO gene polymorphism in rs9939609 at 100 bp position SNP (T/A).
Fig. 5Allelic/genotypic frequency distribution of Study participants.
Fig. 6Allelic Frequency distribution of FTO SNP-rs9939609 variant adjusted different Age groups among study participants.
Fig. 7Allelic Frequency distribution of FTO SNP-rs9939609 variant adjusted-BMI among study Groups.
FTO rs-9939609 SNP Association with BMI of Study Participants of Hyderabad analysed by Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium test (n = 190).
| Model | Genotype | Cases (n=%) | Control (n=%) | OR(95 %CI) | p-value | AIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Codominant | T/T | 80(45.3) | 35(15.2) | 1.00 | 0.032* | 784.5 |
| Dominant | T/T | 80(45.3) | 35(15.2) | 1.00 | 0.05* | 782.9 |
| Recessive | T/T-T/A | 134(73.2) | 54(25.2) | 1.00 | 0.37 | 783.5 |
| Over dominant | T/T-A/A | 87(49) | 41(16.2) | 1.00 | 0.012* | 782.6 |
| Log-additive | – | – | – | 0.41(0.86–0.39) | 0.074 | 780 |