Literature DB >> 34353891

'Unfocused groups': lessons learnt amid remote focus groups in the Philippines.

Mila F Aligato1, Vivienne Endoma1, Jonas Wachinger2, Jhoys Landicho-Guevarra1, Thea Andrea Bravo1, Jerric Rhazel Guevarra1, Jeniffer Landicho1, Shannon A McMahon3,4, Mark Donald C Reñosa1,2.   

Abstract

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has required tremendous shifts in data collection techniques. While an emerging body of research has described experiences conducting remote interviews, less attention has been paid to focus group discussions (FGDs). Herein, we present experiences conducting remote FGDs (n=9) with healthcare workers and caretakers of small children in the Philippines. We used 'Facebook Messenger Room' (FBMR), the preferred platform of participants. Despite some success, we generally encountered considerable challenges in terms of recruiting, retaining and moderating remote FGDs, particularly among caretakers of small children. Finding a quiet, private place proved unfeasible for many participants, who were juggling family demands in tight, locked down quarters. Connectivity issues and technological missteps compromised the flow of FGDs and minimised the ability to share and compare opinions. For the research team, remote FGDs resulted in a dramatic role shift for notetakers-from being passive observers to active tech supporters, chatbox referees and co-moderators (when audio disruptions occurred). Finally, we note that remote FGDs via FBMR are associated with ethical complexities, particularly as participants often chose to use their personal Facebook accounts, which can compromise anonymity. We developed and continuously refined strategies to mitigate challenges, but ultimately decided to forgo FGDs. We urge fellow researchers with more successful experiences to guide the field in terms of capturing high-quality data that respond to research questions, while also contending with privacy concerns, both in online spaces, as well as physical privacy despite lockdowns in tight quarters. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; primary health care; public health; qualitative research

Year:  2021        PMID: 34353891     DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2021-001098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Med Community Health        ISSN: 2305-6983


  3 in total

1.  Investigating Perceptions of Teachers and School Nurses on Child and Adolescent Oral Health in Los Angeles County.

Authors:  Carl A Maida; Marvin Marcus; Di Xiong; Paula Ortega-Verdugo; Elizabeth Agredano; Yilan Huang; Linyu Zhou; Steve Y Lee; Jie Shen; Ron D Hays; James J Crall; Honghu Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Highly valued despite burdens: Qualitative implementation research on rapid tests for hospital-based SARS-CoV-2 screening.

Authors:  Jonas Wachinger; Shannon A McMahon; Julia Lohmann; Manuela De Allegri; Claudia M Denkinger
Journal:  SSM Qual Res Health       Date:  2022-07-30

3.  Bargaining and gendered authority: a framework to understand household decision-making about childhood vaccines in the Philippines.

Authors:  Jonas Wachinger; Mark Donald C Reñosa; Vivienne Endoma; Mila F Aligato; Jhoys Landicho-Guevarra; Jeniffer Landicho; Thea Andrea Bravo; Shannon A McMahon
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.