Literature DB >> 34353749

Patient assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms using the international prostate symptom score following low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

J C Farris1, R T Hughes2, C R Steber2, T E Craven3, B A Frizzell2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To correlate changes in urinary patient-reported outcomes including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), acute urinary retention and urethral stricture with urethral dose in those treated with low dose rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with prostate LDR between 2012 and 2019 (n=117) completed IPSS urinary symptom assessments prior to treatment and at each follow-up. CT simulation was obtained with urinary catheter 1-month post-implant for dosimetric analysis. 113 patients with pre- and ≥1 post-LDR IPSS score available were analyzed. Urethral dosimetric parameters including U75, U100, U125, U150 and U200 were abstracted from post-implant dosimetry and assessed for association with urinary toxicity using bivariate logistic regression and Spearman correlation. Outcomes included clinically significant change (CSC, defined as 4 or more points or 25% rise above baseline) in IPSS score at 6 and 12 months, acute urinary retention (AUR), and urethral stricture (US).
RESULTS: 89 (79%) patients were treated with LDR monotherapy (145 Gy) and 24 (21%) with LDR boost (110 Gy) with external beam radiation therapy. Twenty (18%) had baseline IPSS ≥15. Median IPSS scores were: baseline 6 (3-12; n=113), 1-month 17 (10-25; n=110), 6 months 12 (7-18; n=77), 1 year 8 (5-14; n=52). CSC-6 was observed in 59 (77%), CSC-12 in 26 (50%), AUR in 12 (11%), and US in 4 (4%). No association was identified between urethral dose parameters and CSC-6, CSC-12, AUR, or US. No correlation between urethral dose and IPSS at 6- and 12-months was identified. The IPSS ≥15 group exhibited lower rates of CSC-12 (13% v. 57%, p=0.05) but not CSC-6 (55% v. 80%, p=0.12).
CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a relationship between urethral dose and IPSS elevation, AUR or US. We did identify a significantly lower change in IPSS at 12 months for those with baseline IPSS ≥15 compared to those with low baseline scores.
Copyright © 2021 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brachytherapy; Dosimetry; IPSS; Prostate cancer; Urethral dose; low dose rate; quality of life

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34353749      PMCID: PMC9019850          DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brachytherapy        ISSN: 1538-4721            Impact factor:   2.441


  25 in total

1.  Quality of life of patients after permanent prostate brachytherapy in relation to dosimetry.

Authors:  Marion P R Van Gellekom; Marinus A Moerland; Marco Van Vulpen; Harm K Wijrdeman; Jan J Battermann
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Is there a relation between the radiation dose to the different sub-segments of the lower urinary tract and urinary morbidity after brachytherapy of the prostate with I-125 seeds?

Authors:  Marcel J Steggerda; Thelma Witteveen; Ferrie van den Boom; Luc M F Moonen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Segmental urethral dosimetry and urinary toxicity in patients with no urinary symptoms before permanent prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Carys Thomas; Mira Keyes; Mitchell Liu; Veronika Moravan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Long-Term Efficacy and Toxicity of Low-Dose-Rate ¹²⁵I Prostate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy in Low-, Intermediate-, and High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kittel; Chandana A Reddy; Kristin L Smith; Kevin L Stephans; Rahul D Tendulkar; James Ulchaker; Kenneth Angermeier; Steven Campbell; Andrew Stephenson; Eric A Klein; D Allan Wilkinson; Jay P Ciezki
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Comparison of health-related quality of life 5 years after SPIRIT: Surgical Prostatectomy Versus Interstitial Radiation Intervention Trial.

Authors:  Juanita Mary Crook; Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga; Kris Wallace; Clement Ma; Sharon Fung; Shabbir Alibhai; Michael Jewett; Neil Fleshner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Dosimetry guidelines to minimize urethral and rectal morbidity following transperineal I-125 prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  K Wallner; J Roy; L Harrison
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Long-term follow-up of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in men following prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Xuesong Li; Dong Fang; Matthew R Cooperberg; Jared M Whitson; Tom F Lue; Liqun Zhou; Katsuto Shinohara
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Long-term oncological outcomes and toxicity in 597 men aged ≤60 years at time of low-dose-rate brachytherapy for localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stephen E M Langley; Ricardo Soares; Jennifer Uribe; Santiago Uribe-Lewis; Julian Money-Kyrle; Carla Perna; Sara Khaksar; Robert Laing
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Impact of post-implant dosimetric parameters on the quality of life of patients treated with low-dose rate brachytherapy for localised prostate cancer: results of a single-institution study.

Authors:  Antonello Veccia; Orazio Caffo; Giovanni Fellin; Salvatore Mussari; Francesco Ziglio; Francesca Maines; Luigi Tomio; Enzo Galligioni
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 10.  Low dose rate prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Bradley J Stish; Brian J Davis; Lance A Mynderse; Robert H McLaren; Christopher L Deufel; Richard Choo
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.