In Reply-How Safe Is COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma?

To the Editor:

We would like to thank Franchini and Cruciani for their letter in response to our systematic review and meta-analysis studying the effect of convalescent plasma therapy on the mortality of patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This letter highlights important new meta-analytical data based on 30 controlled studies (including 14 randomized clinical trials) demonstrating that convalescent plasma transfusion does not increase the risk of adverse events, including thromboembolic events, compared with patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who either were not transfused or were transfused with standard fresh frozen plasma. This new safety analysis supports the viewpoint that human convalescent plasma has a favorable risk-benefit ratio, particularly when it is reviewed in the context of the mosaic of evidence supporting some degree of effectiveness of convalescent plasma therapy for COVID-19. Taken as a whole, these data support the continued use of convalescent plasma as the COVID-19 pandemic endures, especially in regions with limited vaccine access and in immunocompromised patients who cannot mount effective immune responses to vaccines.

At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, several theoretical safety risks regarding convalescent plasma therapy were raised, including the potentiation of COVID-19 respiratory deterioration through antibody-dependent enhancement or cytokine storms, transfusion-associated circulatory overload, and enhanced thromboembolic risk. However, the meta-analytical safety data presented in the letter by Franchini and Cruciani along with the consistent signatures of safety emerging from worldwide use of convalescent plasma, including in the United States under the Expanded Access Program and Emergency Use Authorization, have generally allayed these safety concerns. , Convalescent plasma safety can also be inferred from the mortality benefit and rapid clinical improvement in patients with several forms of immunosuppression following convalescent plasma transfusion. These positive safety data are promising, given that immunocompromised patients will continue to represent a vulnerable population throughout the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and may be among those medically advised to not receive vaccination or unable to mount a robust humoral response to vaccination.

Given the link between COVID-19 and thromboembolic diseases and plasma serving as a source of both procoagulant and anticoagulant factors, there may be lingering concerns that convalescent plasma escalates thromboembolic risk, especially among severely ill patients. At present, the aggregate epidemiologic data suggest that convalescent plasma does not increase the thromboembolic risk in patients with COVID-19. To support and confirm these findings, future experimental studies should assess the impact of convalescent plasma on a panel of coagulation factors in patients with COVID-19 or evaluate whether the coagulation profile of COVID-19 convalescent plasma poses a greater thromboembolic risk than standard fresh frozen plasma.

The importance of the work by Franchini and Cruciani is that they have broadly shown there is a consistent safety profile for the use of human convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19. Whereas there are mixed interpretations on the effectiveness of convalescent plasma, the lack of safety concerns must be carefully weighed in the context of the potential for benefit the treatment may offer during the remainder of the COVID-19 pandemic.