Literature DB >> 34353298

Influence of weekday of admission and level of distress on length of hospital stay in patients with low back pain: a retrospective cohort study.

Emanuel Brunner1,2,3, André Meichtry4, Davy Vancampfort5, Reinhard Imoberdorf6, David Gisi7, Wim Dankaerts5, Anita Graf7, Stefanie Wipf Rebsamen7, Daniela Suter8, Lukas Martin Wildi9, Stefan Buechi10, Cornel Sieber6,11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is often a complex problem requiring interdisciplinary management to address patients' multidimensional needs. Providing inpatient care for patients with LBP in primary care hospitals is a challenge. In this setting, interdisciplinary LBP management is often unavailable during weekends. Delays in therapeutic procedures may result in a prolonged length of hospital stay (LoS). The impact of delays on LoS might be strongest in patients reporting high levels of psychological distress. Therefore, this study investigates the influence of weekday of admission and distress on LoS of inpatients with LBP.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 1 February 2019 and 31 January 2020. In part 1, a negative binomial model was fitted to LoS with weekday of admission as a predictor. In part 2, the same model included weekday of admission, distress level, and their interaction as covariates. Planned contrast was used in part 1 to estimate the difference in log-expected LoS between group 1 (admissions Friday/Saturday) and the reference group (admissions Sunday-Thursday). In part 2, the same contrast was used to estimate the corresponding difference in (per-unit) distress trends.
RESULTS: We identified 173 patients with LBP. The mean LoS was 7.8 days (SD = 5.59). Patients admitted on Friday (mean LoS = 10.3) and Saturday (LoS = 10.6) had longer stays, but not those admitted on Sunday (LoS = 7.1). Analysis of the weekday effect and planned contrast showed that admission on Friday or Saturday was associated with a significant increase in LoS (log ratio = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.21 to 0.63). A total of 101 patients (58%) returned questionnaires, and complete data on distress were available from 86 patients (49%). According to the negative binomial model for LoS and the planned contrast, the distress effect on LoS was significantly influenced (difference in slopes = 0.816, 95% CI = 0.03 to 1.60) by dichotomic weekdays of admission (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday).
CONCLUSIONS: Delays in interdisciplinary LBP management over the weekend may prolong LoS. This may particularly affect patients reporting high levels of distress. Our study provides a platform to further explore whether interdisciplinary LBP management addressing patients' multidimensional needs reduces LoS in primary care hospitals.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low back pain; Mental health; Pain management; Primary care; Primary care hospital

Year:  2021        PMID: 34353298     DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04529-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  25 in total

1.  Hospital admissions for acute low back pain.

Authors:  Christopher Needs; Rodger Laurent
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.048

2.  Outcomes of patients admitted to hospital medical units with back pain.

Authors:  Leo Kyi; Rangi Kandane-Rathnayake; Eric Morand; Lynden J Roberts
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.048

3.  The prevalence of back pain in patients in one Australian tertiary hospital population.

Authors:  Diane Dennis; Brigitte Tampin; Angela Jacques; Tracy Hebden-Todd; Vicki Carter; Michelle McLintock; Elizabeth Hurn; Ian Cooper
Journal:  Musculoskeletal Care       Date:  2017-11-10

Review 4.  Will this patient develop persistent disabling low back pain?

Authors:  Roger Chou; Paul Shekelle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Measuring the global burden of low back pain.

Authors:  Damian Hoy; Lyn March; Peter Brooks; Anthony Woolf; Fiona Blyth; Theo Vos; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.098

6.  On the course of low back pain in general practice: a one year follow up study.

Authors:  H J van den Hoogen; B W Koes; J T van Eijk; L M Bouter; W Devillé
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Cost of low back pain in Switzerland in 2005.

Authors:  Simon Wieser; Bruno Horisberger; Sara Schmidhauser; Claudia Eisenring; Urs Brügger; Andreas Ruckstuhl; Jürg Dietrich; Anne F Mannion; Achim Elfering; Ozgür Tamcan; Urs Müller
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-06-05

8.  The clinical course of low back pain: a meta-analysis comparing outcomes in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies.

Authors:  Majid Artus; Danielle van der Windt; Kelvin P Jordan; Peter R Croft
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Long-term trajectories of back pain: cohort study with 7-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kate M Dunn; Paul Campbell; Kelvin P Jordan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Cognitive Functional Therapy: An Integrated Behavioral Approach for the Targeted Management of Disabling Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Peter B O'Sullivan; J P Caneiro; Mary O'Keeffe; Anne Smith; Wim Dankaerts; Kjartan Fersum; Kieran O'Sullivan
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2018-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.