Literature DB >> 34352563

Electrical impedance tomography: A compass for the safe route to optimal PEEP.

Nicolò Sella1, Tommaso Pettenuzzo2, Francesco Zarantonello2, Giulio Andreatta3, Alessandro De Cassai2, Chiara Schiavolin3, Caterina Simoni3, Laura Pasin2, Annalisa Boscolo2, Paolo Navalesi4.   

Abstract

Setting the proper level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a cornerstone of lung protective ventilation. PEEP keeps the alveoli open at the end of expiration, thus reducing atelectrauma and shunt. However, excessive PEEP may contribute to alveolar overdistension. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a non-invasive bedside tool that monitors in real-time ventilation distribution. Aim of this narrative review is summarizing the techniques for EIT-guided PEEP titration, while providing useful insights to enhance comprehension on advantages and limits of EIT for current and future users. EIT detects thoracic impedance to alternating electrical currents between pairs of electrodes and, through the analysis of its temporal and spatial variation, reconstructs a two-dimensional slice image of the lung depicting regional variation of ventilation and perfusion. Several EIT-based methods have been proposed for PEEP titration. The first described technique estimates the variations of regional lung compliance during a decremental PEEP trial, after lung recruitment. The optimal PEEP value is represented by the best compromise between lung collapse and overdistension. Later on, a second technique assessing alveolar recruitment by variation of the end-expiratory lung impedance was validated. Finally, the global inhomogeneity index and the regional ventilation delay, two EIT-derived parameters, showed promising results selecting the optimal PEEP value as the one that presents the lowest global inhomogeneity index or the lowest regional ventilation delay. In conclusion EIT represents a promising technique to individualize PEEP in mechanically ventilated patients. Whether EIT is the best technique for this purpose and the overall influence of personalizing PEEP on clinical outcome remains to be determined.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARDS; Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Acute respiratory failure; EIT; Electrical impedance tomography; Mechanical ventilation; PEEP; Positive end-expiratory pressure

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34352563     DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Med        ISSN: 0954-6111            Impact factor:   3.415


  3 in total

1.  Prone positioning improves ventilation-perfusion matching assessed by electrical impedance tomography in patients with ARDS: a prospective physiological study.

Authors:  Yu-Xian Wang; Ming Zhong; Min-Hui Dong; Jie-Qiong Song; Yi-Jun Zheng; Wei Wu; Jia-le Tao; Ling Zhu; Xin Zheng
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 19.334

2.  Clinical Implications of Determining Individualized Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Using Electrical Impedance Tomography in Post-Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Prospective, Non-Randomized Interventional Study.

Authors:  Kiyoko Bito; Atsuko Shono; Shinya Kimura; Kazuto Maruta; Tadashi Omoto; Atsushi Aoki; Katsunori Oe; Toru Kotani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Distribution of ventilation and oxygenation in surgical obese patients ventilated with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christoph Ellenberger; Paolo Pelosi; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Hermann Wrigge; John Diaper; Andres Hagerman; Yannick Adam; Marcus J Schultz; Marc Licker
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 4.183

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.