Literature DB >> 34352221

Responsiveness to perturbations is a hallmark of transcription factors that maintain cell identity in vitro.

Ian A Mellis1, Hailey I Edelstein2, Rachel Truitt3, Yogesh Goyal4, Lauren E Beck5, Orsolya Symmons5, Margaret C Dunagin5, Ricardo A Linares Saldana6, Parisha P Shah7, Juan A Pérez-Bermejo8, Arun Padmanabhan9, Wenli Yang10, Rajan Jain11, Arjun Raj12.   

Abstract

Identifying the particular transcription factors that maintain cell type in vitro is important for manipulating cell type. Identifying such transcription factors by their cell-type-specific expression or their involvement in developmental regulation has had limited success. We hypothesized that because cell type is often resilient to perturbations, the transcriptional response to perturbations would reveal identity-maintaining transcription factors. We developed perturbation panel profiling (P3) as a framework for perturbing cells across many conditions and measuring gene expression responsiveness transcriptome-wide. In human iPSC-derived cardiac myocytes, P3 showed that transcription factors important for cardiac myocyte differentiation and maintenance were among the most frequently upregulated (most responsive). We reasoned that one function of responsive genes may be to maintain cellular identity. We identified responsive transcription factors in fibroblasts using P3 and found that suppressing their expression led to enhanced reprogramming. We propose that responsiveness to perturbations is a property of transcription factors that help maintain cellular identity in vitro. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the supplemental information.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac myocytes; cell identity; fibroblasts; gene regulation; induced pluripotent stem cells; reprogramming; systems biology; transdifferentiation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34352221      PMCID: PMC8522198          DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2021.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Syst        ISSN: 2405-4712            Impact factor:   11.091


  75 in total

1.  Reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts into cardiomyocyte-like cells in vitro.

Authors:  Li Qian; Emily C Berry; Ji-dong Fu; Masaki Ieda; Deepak Srivastava
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Massively multiplex chemical transcriptomics at single-cell resolution.

Authors:  Sanjay R Srivatsan; José L McFaline-Figueroa; Vijay Ramani; Lauren Saunders; Junyue Cao; Jonathan Packer; Hannah A Pliner; Dana L Jackson; Riza M Daza; Lena Christiansen; Fan Zhang; Frank Steemers; Jay Shendure; Cole Trapnell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Pathogenesis and Cells of Origin of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Jianwen Que; Katherine S Garman; Rhonda F Souza; Stuart Jon Spechler
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Nkx2-1 represses a latent gastric differentiation program in lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Eric L Snyder; Hideo Watanabe; Margaret Magendantz; Sebastian Hoersch; Tiffany A Chen; Diana G Wang; Denise Crowley; Charles A Whittaker; Matthew Meyerson; Shioko Kimura; Tyler Jacks
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  A predictive computational framework for direct reprogramming between human cell types.

Authors:  Owen J L Rackham; Jaber Firas; Hai Fang; Matt E Oates; Melissa L Holmes; Anja S Knaupp; Harukazu Suzuki; Christian M Nefzger; Carsten O Daub; Jay W Shin; Enrico Petretto; Alistair R R Forrest; Yoshihide Hayashizaki; Jose M Polo; Julian Gough
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Half dozen of one, six billion of the other: What can small- and large-scale molecular systems biology learn from one another?

Authors:  Ian A Mellis; Arjun Raj
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Isolation of single-base genome-edited human iPS cells without antibiotic selection.

Authors:  Yuichiro Miyaoka; Amanda H Chan; Luke M Judge; Jennie Yoo; Miller Huang; Trieu D Nguyen; Paweena P Lizarraga; Po-Lin So; Bruce R Conklin
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Paul Theodor Pyl; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Restriction of Cellular Plasticity of Differentiated Cells Mediated by Chromatin Modifiers, Transcription Factors and Protein Kinases.

Authors:  Dylan P Rahe; Oliver Hobert
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Dissecting engineered cell types and enhancing cell fate conversion via CellNet.

Authors:  Samantha A Morris; Patrick Cahan; Hu Li; Anna M Zhao; Adrianna K San Roman; Ramesh A Shivdasani; James J Collins; George Q Daley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cell type determination for cardiac differentiation occurs soon after seeding of human-induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Connie L Jiang; Yogesh Goyal; Naveen Jain; Qiaohong Wang; Rachel E Truitt; Allison J Coté; Benjamin Emert; Ian A Mellis; Karun Kiani; Wenli Yang; Rajan Jain; Arjun Raj
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 17.906

2.  A novel classification method for NSCLC based on the background interaction network and the edge-perturbation matrix.

Authors:  Yuan Tian; Caiqing Zhang; Wanru Ma; Alan Huang; Mei Tian; Junyan Zhao; Qi Dang; Yuping Sun
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 5.955

3.  Characterizing cellular heterogeneity in chromatin state with scCUT&Tag-pro.

Authors:  Bingjie Zhang; Avi Srivastava; Eleni Mimitou; Tim Stuart; Ivan Raimondi; Yuhan Hao; Peter Smibert; Rahul Satija
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 68.164

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.